Defamation Lawsuit Pits Alan Dershowitz Against Epstein Sex Trafficking Accuser
An accuser of billionaire Jeffrey Epstein, who claims Alan Dershowitz engaged in sexual activity with her when she was a minor being trafficked by the financier, is suing the former Harvard Law professor over claims he defamed her
April 16, 2019 at 06:27 PM
4 minute read
A new libel suit filed in Manhattan federal court Tuesday accuses Alan Dershowitz of making knowingly false and malicious defamatory statements against Virginia Giuffre, one of the women who claims billionaire financier Jeffrey Epstein engaged in human trafficking and sexual assault against her when she was a teenager.
Giuffre claims Dershowitz's public statements claiming her legal pursuits of Epstein were based on fabricated details, along with his flat-out denials that he himself engaged in sexual acts with her when she was underage, amount to “a desperate barrage of false and increasingly defamatory attacks” on her.
Dershowitz, who retired as a Harvard Law School professor in 2013 and has been an attorney in a string of high-profile legal matters, immediately asserted that Giuffre has walked into a legal quagmire that will result in significant repercussions.
“This finally gives me an opportunity, in court, to prove this woman is a perjurer,” Dershowitz told the New York Law Journal. “She has made a terrible mistake, and her lawyers have made a terrible mistake, in filing this, because she will be going to prison.”
The suit is the latest legal clash between Epstein and his allies on one side, and a cadre of women who have come out publicly to accuse him and others around him of sexual assault and human trafficking that went far beyond the single charge of solicitation he pleaded to in 2008.
Giuffre in particular has waged a number of battles, both legal and public, with Epstein, Dershowitz and others over her claims she was one of a number of teenage girls lured into Epstein's Palm Beach mansion, only to be sexually abused by Epstein and others.
Dershowitz, Giuffre claims, was one of the others. She claims Epstein required her to be “on call,” and that she was regularly “lent out to others for sexual purposes” over the course of two years. According to her complaint, Giuffre engaged in sexual acts with Dershowitz on multiple occasions, including in Epstein's Manhattan residence on the Upper East Side.
The long-simmering situation surrounding Epstein came to a head last year when the Miami Herald published a series detailing allegations about Epstein that included dozens of women and also included the specific allegations leveled against Dershowitz by Giuffre.
Giuffre in the complaint said a 2014 suit filed on her behalf against Dershowitz is the source of the former Harvard Law professor's assertions that she committed perjury.
According to Giuffre's complaint, Dershowitz asserted that her own lawyers didn't believe her claims against him and that she intentionally committed perjury as part of an extortion scheme, which ended in an undisclosed settlement.
Since then, Giuffre said, Dershowitz has remained on the attack, making public statements questioning her veracity and claims that are not backed up by testimony and evidence she plans on presenting at trial.
“Dershowitz has repeatedly, publicly claimed that he wanted to have a trial that would determine the facts concerning his conduct,” the complaint states. “Mr. Dershowitz now has what he claims to have been looking for.”
In a statement, Boies Schiller Flexner partner Josh Schiller said that Dershowitz needed to address the detailed factual allegations against him “with something more than emotional conclusory denials and ad hominem attacks.”
“Mr. Dershowitz continues his unfortunate pattern of trying to avoid dealing with his own conduct by attacking victims and their lawyers,” Schiller said. “Whether or not that works with the media (I personally don't think it does), that doesn't work in court.”
For his part, Dershowitz reiterated his claim that he has never met Giuffre, and that it will be he who provides documentary evidence in court that will show she is the one being dishonest. He claimed his filings would, in fact, provide a counterpoint to each allegation made against him by Giuffre.
Dershowitz said he was still putting together his legal team in the matter.
Related:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAttorneys 'On the Move': Structured Finance Attorney Joins Hunton Andrews Kurth; Foley Adds IP Partner
4 minute readNY Civil Liberties Legal Director Stepping Down After Lengthy Tenure
Former Top Aide to NYC Mayor Is Charged With Bribery Conspiracy
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250