Defamation Lawsuit Pits Alan Dershowitz Against Epstein Sex Trafficking Accuser
An accuser of billionaire Jeffrey Epstein, who claims Alan Dershowitz engaged in sexual activity with her when she was a minor being trafficked by the financier, is suing the former Harvard Law professor over claims he defamed her
April 16, 2019 at 06:27 PM
4 minute read
A new libel suit filed in Manhattan federal court Tuesday accuses Alan Dershowitz of making knowingly false and malicious defamatory statements against Virginia Giuffre, one of the women who claims billionaire financier Jeffrey Epstein engaged in human trafficking and sexual assault against her when she was a teenager.
Giuffre claims Dershowitz's public statements claiming her legal pursuits of Epstein were based on fabricated details, along with his flat-out denials that he himself engaged in sexual acts with her when she was underage, amount to “a desperate barrage of false and increasingly defamatory attacks” on her.
Dershowitz, who retired as a Harvard Law School professor in 2013 and has been an attorney in a string of high-profile legal matters, immediately asserted that Giuffre has walked into a legal quagmire that will result in significant repercussions.
“This finally gives me an opportunity, in court, to prove this woman is a perjurer,” Dershowitz told the New York Law Journal. “She has made a terrible mistake, and her lawyers have made a terrible mistake, in filing this, because she will be going to prison.”
The suit is the latest legal clash between Epstein and his allies on one side, and a cadre of women who have come out publicly to accuse him and others around him of sexual assault and human trafficking that went far beyond the single charge of solicitation he pleaded to in 2008.
Giuffre in particular has waged a number of battles, both legal and public, with Epstein, Dershowitz and others over her claims she was one of a number of teenage girls lured into Epstein's Palm Beach mansion, only to be sexually abused by Epstein and others.
Dershowitz, Giuffre claims, was one of the others. She claims Epstein required her to be “on call,” and that she was regularly “lent out to others for sexual purposes” over the course of two years. According to her complaint, Giuffre engaged in sexual acts with Dershowitz on multiple occasions, including in Epstein's Manhattan residence on the Upper East Side.
The long-simmering situation surrounding Epstein came to a head last year when the Miami Herald published a series detailing allegations about Epstein that included dozens of women and also included the specific allegations leveled against Dershowitz by Giuffre.
Giuffre in the complaint said a 2014 suit filed on her behalf against Dershowitz is the source of the former Harvard Law professor's assertions that she committed perjury.
According to Giuffre's complaint, Dershowitz asserted that her own lawyers didn't believe her claims against him and that she intentionally committed perjury as part of an extortion scheme, which ended in an undisclosed settlement.
Since then, Giuffre said, Dershowitz has remained on the attack, making public statements questioning her veracity and claims that are not backed up by testimony and evidence she plans on presenting at trial.
“Dershowitz has repeatedly, publicly claimed that he wanted to have a trial that would determine the facts concerning his conduct,” the complaint states. “Mr. Dershowitz now has what he claims to have been looking for.”
In a statement, Boies Schiller Flexner partner Josh Schiller said that Dershowitz needed to address the detailed factual allegations against him “with something more than emotional conclusory denials and ad hominem attacks.”
“Mr. Dershowitz continues his unfortunate pattern of trying to avoid dealing with his own conduct by attacking victims and their lawyers,” Schiller said. “Whether or not that works with the media (I personally don't think it does), that doesn't work in court.”
For his part, Dershowitz reiterated his claim that he has never met Giuffre, and that it will be he who provides documentary evidence in court that will show she is the one being dishonest. He claimed his filings would, in fact, provide a counterpoint to each allegation made against him by Giuffre.
Dershowitz said he was still putting together his legal team in the matter.
Related:
Second Circuit Panel Questions Seal in Human Trafficking Suit
After Fall From Grace, David Boies Plots Next Battle
Client Who Stood Up for Boies Goes Public in Sex Trafficking Case
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Denies Retrial Bid by Ex-U.S. Sen. Menendez Over Evidentiary Error
What Businesses Need to Know About Anticipated FTC Leadership Changes
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 15th Circuit Considers Challenge to Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
- 2Crocs Accused of Padding Revenue With Channel-Stuffing HEYDUDE Shoes
- 3E-discovery Practitioners Are Racing to Adapt to Social Media’s Evolving Landscape
- 4The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 5FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250