Employment Litigator Files for Bankruptcy, Listing Over $10 Million in Debts
Jeffrey Liddle, the last remaining lawyer at Liddle & Robinson, said he and his firm are in "severe financial distress." Some firms that have defended him in litigation, including Kasowitz Benson Torres, are pursuing him for legal fees.
April 16, 2019 at 06:18 PM
5 minute read
Jeffrey Liddle, the employment lawyer known for representing finance professionals, has filed for bankruptcy and is being pursued by creditors for more than $10 million, including law firms that haven't gotten paid.
His law firm, Liddle & Robinson, hasn't filed for bankruptcy, but Liddle said in his own Chapter 11 filing last month that he did business as the firm and that he planned to file a separate case on his firm's behalf ”as soon as practicable.” More recently, he was less committal, writing in court papers in April that he was “reviewing the need to file a separate bankruptcy case” for Liddle & Robinson.
In his bankruptcy papers, filed in the Southern District of New York, Liddle said he and his firm, which now has no other lawyers, are in “severe financial distress” after Counsel Financial, an upstate New York lender that lent his firm at least $5.6 million, took steps to seize $2 million from the sale of his personal co-op apartment. He said his firm's revenues have dropped since 2015, when lawyers began leaving the firm.
Kasowitz Benson Torres also has an outstanding judgment against Liddle's firm for unpaid legal bills totaling more than $189,000 that it has sought to collect. Other firms owed money include Eisner PC, owed almost $135,000; Blank Rome, owed more than $83,000; and White & Wolnerman, owed nearly $47,000, according to Liddle's filings. According to court records, the firms defended Liddle and his firm over the years in various litigation.
In his bankruptcy papers, Liddle said he still has a stable of 30 cases and a number of other matters that could generate cash. From 1998 through 2015, he wrote, Liddle & Robinson netted about $13.5 million in revenues per year, after expenses, but business fell after five partners left from 2015 through 2016, along with an unstated number of associates. Now his only employee is an assistant, Liddle said in court papers.
“It is my belief and hope that under the protections granted by Chapter 11, I will be able to continue a strong practice, develop a consensual plan for creditors [or] at the very least manage an orderly disposition of my and the firm's affairs,” he wrote.
The bankruptcy case is the latest bad news for Liddle's employment law boutique, which says on its website that it has won $500 million for clients over the years. Last year, the firm was hit with a discrimination suit by former partner Andrea Paparella, who claimed she was underpaid and mistreated because of her gender. That suit is ongoing in Manhattan federal court.
Counsel Financial, based near Buffalo, New York, is the key creditor of Liddle and his firm, having lent the firm $5.6 million in 2016 at an 18 percent interest rate, according to filings in a related state court lawsuit in Erie County Supreme Court. The lender said Liddle has acknowledged owing Counsel Financial affiliates a total of some $7.8 million and said Liddle has proved to be “deceitful … nothing more than a fraudster.”
Liddle and three other attorneys at the firm were listed as guarantors on the Counsel Financial paperwork. But two of the partners said in affidavits that Liddle was to blame for defaulting on the loan, adding that they'd settled with the lender. The two partners also claimed Liddle used $1.1 million of the loan to pay his own debts to the IRS, more than the $900,000 that was allowed.
“Liddle ran the firm to the exclusion of his 'partners,'” Blaine Bortnick and James Hubbard said in their affidavits filed in the state court lawsuit brought by Counsel Financial. “In fact, Liddle made virtually every significant business and financial decision concerning the firm's business and finances without consulting his partners.”
Liddle shot back in state court that Counsel Financial charged a usurious interest rate. He has also accused the company of trying to sabotage the sale of his co-op unit and to seize a part of the proceeds that belonged to his wife.
Liddle and his lawyers at Torys in New York didn't respond to calls and email comment requests on Monday, and a phone number listed on Liddle & Robinson's website was disconnected.
David Wander of Davidoff Hutcher & Citron, who represents a Counsel Financial affiliate, struck a conciliatory tone when asked about the case.
“Our goal is to try to work constructively with the debtor and with his professionals,” he said. “Now that he's in bankruptcy, the goal is to not have scorched-earth litigation, but to work on getting everyone paid.”
As things stand, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Sean Lane has extended the bankruptcy stay over any litigation to cover Liddle & Robinson and has ordered Liddle and his firm to stick to a budget of about $190,000 over the next two months, including salaries for an attorney and a paralegal Liddle & Robinson plans to hire.
More filings are expected in the coming weeks.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Judge Told Archegos Founder Can't Afford What Defense Says Is 'Unjustified' $10 Billion Restitution
Bank of America's Cash Sweep Program Attracts New Legal Fire in Class Action
3 minute readUS Judge Rejects Morgan Stanley Reconsideration Bid in Deferred Compensation Litigation
SEC Under Trump 2.0 Likely to Take More 'Measured' Enforcement Approach, Observers Say
Trending Stories
- 1How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using?
- 2Trying a Case for Abu Ghraib Detainees Two Decades After Abuse
- 3The Distribution of Dangerous Products Via Online Marketplaces
- 4The Products Liability Case Against Tianeptine: The Deadly ‘Dietary Supplement’ Found at Your Local Store
- 5The Evolving Landscape of Joint and Several Liability in Pa.: A Post-'Spencer' Analysis
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250