Albany Law Teams With SUNY Poly to Give Students Chance to Bring New Tech From Lab to Market
The program, called the Innovation Intensive Clinic, will be open to 2L and 3L Albany Law students, who aren't required to have an engineering or tech background, and SUNY Poly business and engineering students.
April 19, 2019 at 01:30 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
Albany Law School and the SUNY Polytechnic Institute are teaming up to offer law, business and engineering students a program to gain hands-on experience in shepherding SUNY products from the lab to the market. The aim is to learn firsthand how commercializing technology includes not just science and engineering expertise, but legal and regulatory prowess.
To be sure, the announcement isn't Albany Law's first collaboration with SUNY. Indeed, since 2004 SUNY's Research Foundation has offered Albany Law students internships to essentially manage SUNY's patents. Albany Law is also no stranger to technology, as it recently offered a course for students to create tech solutions for legal challenges. This new venture with SUNY Poly, however, brings students with differing expertise and majors together with the goal of making a technology product purchasable by the public.
The program, called the Innovation Intensive Clinic, will launch this fall and will be open to 2L and 3L Albany Law students, who aren't required to have an engineering or tech background, and SUNY Poly business and engineering students.
Specifically, law students will use their legal skills to negotiate contracts and patents and consider any regulatory requirements for their team's product. They will also extend their knowledge of the tech field through working with engineers, said Albany Law president and dean Alicia Ouellette.
Ouellette noted the program was a response to a growing employer demand for lawyers to understand technology and be able to work with tech professionals. The program also serves to commercialize technology created by SUNY, which includes products related to semiconductor sensors, computer chips, drones, and biomedical and life sciences innovations.
“Part of our mission at SUNY is to commercialize technology, to get SUNY technology from lab to market,” said Heather Hage, Research Foundation vice president for industry and external affairs. “To do that, university startups are an increasingly common way to make that happen.”
She added, lawyers “are working hand-in-hand with scientists who have deep, deep expertise in their discipline. It's that convergences of those areas, the legal, business and scientist, that make the strongest teams in practice. You need those things together.”
Indeed, the composition of many tech startup includes a developer applying their tech knowledge to create a product and a lawyer leveraging her legal expertise to draft and negotiate contracts, file patents and navigate regulations.
Recently, for example, the lawyer-engineer duo behind Jet.Law and CaseGuide Inc. secured an investment from startup accelerator Y Combinator. What's more, artificial intelligence-powered contract manager Evisort, which is the brainchild of Harvard Law and MIT graduates, announced in February that it raised $4.5 million.
While the job market looks promising for lawyers who have experience working with engineers, Albany Law's Ouellette noted that the experience of working with people with different expertise can also provide an invaluable skill set for any professional.
“I think it's a really phenomenal opportunity for students to be immersed in what is a different culture, just like a language immersion program, you will be fluent in tech and you can't lose with gaining that knowledge,” she said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Understanding the HEMS Standard in Trusts
- 2Mergers Are About People, Not Paperwork: Here’s Why
- 3Wachtell Partner Leaves to Chair Latham's Liability Management Practice
- 4Morris Nichols Partners to Be Involved With PLI Program
- 5How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'Cultivating a Culture of Mutual Trust Is Essential,' Says Gina Piazza of Tarter Krinsky & Drogin
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250