Ways and Means Retirement Bill Would Adversely Affect IRA Charitable Gifts
In his Estate Planning and Philanthropy column, Conrad Teitell discusses various provisions of the Ways and Means Committee's bill.
April 19, 2019 at 02:45 PM
4 minute read
Increasing the IRA Required Minimum Distribution (RMD) age from 70½ to 72 would adversely affect tax-free IRA gifts. Current law (enacted in 2006) authorizes tax-free direct transfers to public charities (except Donor Advised Funds and Supporting Organizations) of up to $100,000 annually by individuals 70½ or over. Those transfers to charity are tax-free including RMDs. Although charitable deductions aren't allowed, the withdrawals aren't taxable. Not being taxed on income is the equivalent of a charitable deduction.
This, in effect, gives a charitable deduction to taxpayers who take the standard deduction (and there are many more of them now that the standard deduction has been doubled).
Current law benefits itemizers too. Taking a taxable RMD and then making a gift and claiming a charitable deduction doesn't always result in a wash. The withdrawal increases adjusted gross income. That can muck up the medical expense and casualty loss deductions and increase Social Security taxes.
Additional benefits in some states. Not all states allow income tax charitable deductions. The direct gift to charity from an IRA in states following Federal tax rules won't be taxable. The RMD won't be includable in state income—again the equivalent of a charitable deduction.
Increasing the age from 70½ to age 72 for RMDs means that the current tax-encouraged way of benefitting charities is postponed. Charities cannot oppose this provision, but can argue it is another reason to enact the Legacy IRA (below).
Why the increase from 70½ to 72? According to the Ways and Means Committee, the policy behind the current age 70½ rule was to ensure that individuals spend their retirement savings during their lifetime and not use their retirement plans for estate planning purposes to transfer wealth to beneficiaries. However, the age 70½ was first applied to retirement plans in the early 1960s and hasn't been adjusted to take into account increased life expectancy. Thus the bill increases the Required Minimum Distribution age from 70½ to 72.
The proposed Legacy IRA—briefly stated. The annual ceiling on transfers from a donor's IRA to fund life-income plans (charitable remainder trusts and charitable gift annuities) would be $400,000 for individuals 65 or older. For individuals 70½ (72 if the age is changed) or older, the combined ceiling for direct and life-income transfers from IRAs would be $400,000, with a $100,000 cap for direct transfers.
The Legacy IRA Act was introduced in the House of Representatives in the last two congressional sessions. It is expected to be introduced soon in both the House and Senate.
Among other provisions of the Ways and Means Committee's bill (called the SECURE* Act):
• Repeal the prohibition on contributions to a traditional IRA by an individual who has attained age 70½.
• Allow long-term part-time workers to participate in 401(k) Plans
• Allow penalty-free withdrawals from retirement plans for any “qualified birth or adoption distributions.”
• Expand 529 education savings accounts to cover costs associated with registered apprenticeships, homeschooling; and up to $10,000 of qualified student loan repayments (including those for siblings).
* SECURE Act: Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act of 2019. That's a doozy of a name even though it doesn't describe the Act—no doubt coined by the U.S. Bureau of Acronyms.
Conrad Teitell is a principal at Cummings & Lockwood in Stamford, Conn.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readTrump, ABC News Settlement in Defamation Lawsuit Includes $1M in Attorney Fees For President-Elect
Trending Stories
- 1Biden Vetoes Bill to Create More Federal Judgeships
- 2Memories of a Straight Shooter
- 3It Was a Wild Ride: Check Out the Top In-House Stories of 2024
- 4People in the News—Dec. 27, 2024—Stevens & Lee, Chartwell Law
- 5How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'It's Essential to Have a Clear Vision,' Says Matthew Carey of Marshall Gerstein
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250