Legislation Spurred by Allegations Against Ex-NY AG Eric Schneiderman Gains Momentum in Albany
Assemblywoman Aravella Simotas, D-Queens, signed on to sponsor the legislation in her chamber this month, making it more likely to become law by the time the Legislature adjourns for the year in June.
April 22, 2019 at 12:29 PM
6 minute read
Legislation introduced in response to allegations of violent behavior of former New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman toward women with whom he had sexual relationships that would make those actions eligible for criminal charges is gaining momentum among state lawmakers in New York.
The bill would add a definition of criminal sexual harassment to the state's penal code, which would define the charge as a class A misdemeanor punishable by up to nearly a year in jail.
It was inspired by the alleged acts of Schneiderman, who was accused of committing violent acts against four women in a widely read article from The New Yorker last year that ultimately led to his resignation just hours after publication on the internet.
Assemblywoman Aravella Simotas, D-Queens, signed on to sponsor the legislation in her chamber this month, making it more likely to become law by the time the Legislature adjourns for the year in June. It was previously introduced by State Sen. Alessandra Biaggi, D-Bronx.
“When a survivor has the courage to come forward and report this type of abuse, it is unconscionable that the perpetrator would be able to evade all consequences for their actions,” Simotas said.
Biaggi said the legislation is intended to address acts of sexual harassment and domestic violence that may go unnoticed and, consequently, not be addressed. It would give victims an opportunity to confront their alleged abusers in ways they aren't able to now, Biaggi said.
“Oftentimes these acts of abuse are not externally visible. However, the trauma and resulting physical and emotional wounds run deep and are long-lasting,” Biaggi said. “It's critical that we continue to demonstrate in our legislation that the needs and recognition of the abused are first and foremost and that abusers must be held accountable for all of their malicious aggression.”
State Sen. Todd Kaminsky, D-Nassau, is sponsoring the bill with Biaggi in the Senate. He's not unfamiliar with the section of state law the legislation aims to address; Kaminsky was previously a domestic violence prosecutor at the Queens District Attorneys Office.
“Sexually motivated physical abuse is serious and should be treated by our laws as such,” Kaminsky said. “Unfortunately, our state has a loophole in its penal law, allowing those who perpetrate violence to avoid prosecution. I am a proud cosponsor of legislation that would give prosecutors the tools they require to overcome these obstacles to justice.”
The bill is supported by Nassau County District Attorney Madeline Singas, a Democrat who was assigned as special prosecutor to investigate Schneiderman's alleged conduct after he resigned from office. Singas was selected after Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. agreed to step aside because of an ongoing probe by Schneiderman's office into his handling of an investigation into sexual assault claims against former film mogul Harvey Weinstein.
Her office undertook a six-month investigation into the allegations from the article that resulted in no criminal charges against Schneiderman—not because the claims were untrue, but because there was no applicable state law that could be used to prosecute him.
The law currently only allows criminal charges in cases when the offender's intent when hitting someone during sex is to “alarm, harass, or annoy” the victim. The victim also has to provide proof that they suffered “substantial pain.”
Schneiderman's alleged actions did not meet those definitions, Singas said at the time. He was accused in the article of becoming physically violent during sex and on other occasions that either did not meet the definition of a criminal act or happened outside the statute of limitations for those charges.
The article included interviews and details from three women who claimed he physically abused them during their relationship. A fourth woman claimed Schneiderman slapped her when she rejected his advances.
One of the women interviewed claimed that, after they started dating, he began to slap her during sex without her consent. He also choked her and spat at her, the woman claimed. She described him as “a Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde” figure based on the behavior, which is currently not chargeable under state law, according to Singas.
Another woman claimed that, at one point, Schneiderman slapped her so hard that she had to seek medical attention after the incident. The doctor removed dry blood from her ear, which was presumably there from the strike.
Two other woman, interviewed anonymously, claimed Schneiderman exhibited the same behavior toward them. One said Schneiderman, again, slapped her in bed without asking for her consent. Another claimed Schneiderman slapped her after she pulled away from him during a date.
But those alleged actions, while reprehensible, were not eligible for criminal charges under the current state law, Singas said. The legislation from Simotas and Biaggi would change that.
“This legislation is a way to protect survivors of intimate partner violence by holding abusers accountable,” Simotas said. “It is shocking that New York district attorneys do not have the legal means to bring justice to survivors of violence committed for sexual gratification unless the violence rises to extreme levels.”
The bill would add a new charge of sexual harassment that could be levied when a person, with the purpose of sexual arousal or gratification, and without consent, slaps, strikes, shoves, or kicks another person. The charge would be a class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to 364 days in jail.
Singas had urged lawmakers when she concluded her investigation last November to enact legislation verbatim to the bill introduced by Simotas and Biaggi. The charge would be subject to a two-year statute of limitations, which wouldn't have extended to all of Schneiderman's alleged victims, but it would have allowed charges to some extent.
“Victims of intimate partner violence deserve stronger legal protections, and I'm grateful to Assemblymember Simotas for carrying this important legislation,” Singas said. “This legislation criminalizes nonconsensual violence that is inadequately addressed by existing law.”
It goes without saying, but the legislation would also allowed prosecutors in New York to levy the charge against any perpetrator of domestic violence whose actions may not fit the statutory definition of such a crime. If passed, the bill would take effect this November.
The bill has been referred to the Codes Committee in both the State Assembly and Senate, but hasn't moved since. Lawmakers are not in session this week, but could begin to move the bill when they return to Albany for the rest of this year's legislative session next week. They're scheduled to leave Albany for the year in June.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMore Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Lululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1US Supreme Court Tries to Define a 'Crime of Violence'
- 2How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'Think About Why You Want the Role, Because It Is Not an Easy Job,' Says Aaron Rubin of Morrison Foerster
- 3People in the News—Nov. 22, 2024—Marshall Dennehey, Buchanan Ingersoll
- 4$83M Verdict After $100K Demand Rejected in Henry County
- 5Samsung Flooded With Galaxy Product Patent Lawsuits in Texas Federal Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250