
New York Law Journal Accused of Showing Bias Against President Trump
I find it ironic that while we're increasingly made aware of the dangers of “implicit bias” in matters of sex and race, the NYLJ and too many of our colleagues seem to embrace a type of “bash Trump” bias in almost everything they do.
April 25, 2019 at 12:28 PM
3 minute read
A blast email from NYLJ seems to “stretch” for an anti-Trump angle: “Man accused of pretending to be a lawyer turns out to be a founder of a pro-Trump campus group.” There is no connection between this individual, or conduct he's accused of and Donald Trump, except apparently at one point (in college) he was pro-Trump in his politics.
By contrast, a recent NYLJ article about Greg Craig “buries the lede.” Former Obama Counsel Mr. Craig was charged with being an undisclosed agent for Ukraine. That is, Mr. Craig was charged with what essentially led the media to characterize Paul Manafort as a “Russian agent.” The NYLJ headline described him (only) as “Former Skadden Partner”–as though that were the newsworthy association. If Mr. Craig were counsel to Donald Trump, is there any doubt the NYLJ would have led with “Trump Counsel Charged With Lying About Ukraine?”
These are only two examples of a bias that I think takes the politics and sensibilities of too many NY lawyers for granted. But more dangerously, this type of political “blind spot” can lead to publications such as NYLJ to fail to report (or take on in editorials) what should be discussed. Our New York Attorney General Letitia James was quoted shortly before taking office “We will use every area of the law to investigate President Trump and his business transactions and that of his family as well.”
If you “hate Trump” this may make you smile for a moment. But as lawyers are we okay with our chief law enforcement officer threatening to use state prosecution to selectively “investigate” her political enemies? Our colleagues in white-collar criminal defense could attest that “the process is punishment” in wide-ranging investigations. That is, not only “the guilty” should have something to fear if called out for selective, or excessive “investigation” by the chief law enforcement authority of the state.
The silence of the NYLJ on that pronouncement was deafening. In my opinion it deserved a full-throated condemnation by the NYLJ editorial board, and by any publication purporting to be serious about the law and equal application of the law.
I find it ironic that while we're increasingly made aware of the dangers of “implicit bias” in matters of sex and race, the NYLJ and too many of our colleagues seem to embrace a type of “bash Trump” bias in almost everything they do. I think the NYLJ can do better than this.
Laurence Deutsch is a name partner at North & Deutsch. The views expressed in this letter are personal and do not represent the firm.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Attorney Responds to Outten & Golden Managing Partner's Letter on Dropped Client
3 minute read
Letter to the Editor: Law Journal Used Misleading Photo for Article on Election Observers
1 minute read
NYC's Administrative Court's to Publish Some Rulings in the New York Law Journal Is Welcomed. But It Should Go Further
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Attorney Sanctioned for Not Exercising Ordinary Care: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
- 2$1.9M Settlement Approved in Class Suit Over Vacant Property Fees
- 3Former Wamco Exec Charged With $600M 'Cherry-Picking' Fraud
- 4Stock Trading App Robinhood Hit With Privacy Class Action 1 Month After Alleged Data Breach
- 5NY High Court Returns Fired Priest's Discrimination Claim to State Agency
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250