New York Law Journal Accused of Showing Bias Against President Trump
I find it ironic that while we're increasingly made aware of the dangers of “implicit bias” in matters of sex and race, the NYLJ and too many of our colleagues seem to embrace a type of “bash Trump” bias in almost everything they do.
April 25, 2019 at 12:28 PM
3 minute read
A blast email from NYLJ seems to “stretch” for an anti-Trump angle: “Man accused of pretending to be a lawyer turns out to be a founder of a pro-Trump campus group.” There is no connection between this individual, or conduct he's accused of and Donald Trump, except apparently at one point (in college) he was pro-Trump in his politics.
By contrast, a recent NYLJ article about Greg Craig “buries the lede.” Former Obama Counsel Mr. Craig was charged with being an undisclosed agent for Ukraine. That is, Mr. Craig was charged with what essentially led the media to characterize Paul Manafort as a “Russian agent.” The NYLJ headline described him (only) as “Former Skadden Partner”–as though that were the newsworthy association. If Mr. Craig were counsel to Donald Trump, is there any doubt the NYLJ would have led with “Trump Counsel Charged With Lying About Ukraine?”
These are only two examples of a bias that I think takes the politics and sensibilities of too many NY lawyers for granted. But more dangerously, this type of political “blind spot” can lead to publications such as NYLJ to fail to report (or take on in editorials) what should be discussed. Our New York Attorney General Letitia James was quoted shortly before taking office “We will use every area of the law to investigate President Trump and his business transactions and that of his family as well.”
If you “hate Trump” this may make you smile for a moment. But as lawyers are we okay with our chief law enforcement officer threatening to use state prosecution to selectively “investigate” her political enemies? Our colleagues in white-collar criminal defense could attest that “the process is punishment” in wide-ranging investigations. That is, not only “the guilty” should have something to fear if called out for selective, or excessive “investigation” by the chief law enforcement authority of the state.
The silence of the NYLJ on that pronouncement was deafening. In my opinion it deserved a full-throated condemnation by the NYLJ editorial board, and by any publication purporting to be serious about the law and equal application of the law.
I find it ironic that while we're increasingly made aware of the dangers of “implicit bias” in matters of sex and race, the NYLJ and too many of our colleagues seem to embrace a type of “bash Trump” bias in almost everything they do. I think the NYLJ can do better than this.
Laurence Deutsch is a name partner at North & Deutsch. The views expressed in this letter are personal and do not represent the firm.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAttorney Responds to Outten & Golden Managing Partner's Letter on Dropped Client
3 minute readLetter to the Editor: Law Journal Used Misleading Photo for Article on Election Observers
1 minute readNYC's Administrative Court's to Publish Some Rulings in the New York Law Journal Is Welcomed. But It Should Go Further
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Inside Track: AI Is Sure to Fray Big Law's Devotion to Billable Hour
- 2Evidence Explained: Prevailing Attorney Outlines Successful Defense in Inmate Death Case
- 3The Week in Data Jan. 24: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
- 4The Use of Psychologists as Coaches/Trial Consultants
- 5Could This Be the Era of Client-Centricity?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250