Melcher's Suit Against Greenberg Traurig Ends After 12 Years
A trial was scheduled this spring over claims that Leslie Corwin and his former firm, Greenberg Traurig, had violated Section 487 of New York Judiciary Law, which bars attorney deceit.
April 26, 2019 at 06:00 PM
2 minute read
A long-running lawsuit against Greenberg Traurig and its former partner Leslie Corwin over claims they defended a hedge fund manager based on a fabricated document has come to a close, according to court papers.
James Melcher, an investment manager, claimed Corwin and his former firm deceived the court by using fake paperwork to defend Melcher's onetime business partner Brandon Fradd in an underlying suit Melcher filed over $6.5 million in profits he said he was owed.
Melcher settled with Fradd for $5 million, but his follow-up case against Greenberg spanned nearly 12 years. The parties were finally scheduled to go to trial this spring on claims that Corwin and his former firm had violated Section 487 of New York Judiciary Law, which bars attorney deceit.
The parties never filed any paperwork revealing that they had reached a settlement, but several pending motions were closed on Friday in decisions that said “this motion … is denied as moot, the matter having ended.” Justice O. Peter Sherwood also ticked a box saying “case disposed.”
Any terms the parties may have agreed to were not publicly disclosed by Friday afternoon. Other than to confirm the case ended, defense lawyer Jonathan Youngwood, partner of Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, declined to comment. Melcher was represented by Jeffrey Jannuzzo, who declined to comment.
The decision comes after an appellate decision in September that prevented Melcher from using certain testimony that he planned to use to make his case for $16 million in damages. The defense argued in an October letter that, even if he prevailed, Melcher was only entitled to some fraction of $1.6 million in legal fees that he argued he wouldn't have incurred if his adversaries had come clean.
More recently, several motions regarding trial evidence were decided a way that didn't clearly cut in favor of one side or the other. While Melcher sought to draw attention to missing witnesses that he argued would have bolstered his case and got turned down by the court, his lawyer convinced the court to bar certain defenses, and Greenberg Traurig and Corwin also failed to have some evidence precluded.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readTreasury Issues New Regulations on Allocation of Partnership Liabilities
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250