NY Lawmakers Set to Move Bills to Target Trump's State Taxes, Sidestep Pardons
Both bills were inspired by Trump, who has decided against releasing his tax returns to Congress and the public, while also hinting that he could issue pardons for individuals in his inner circle charged by federal prosecutors, including Special Counsel Robert Mueller III.
April 30, 2019 at 03:27 PM
6 minute read
Legislation that would allow U.S. Congress to request President Donald Trump's state tax returns from an agency in New York and another measure that would allow state prosecutors to bring charges against individuals granted a presidential pardon is expected to pass the New York State Senate, Democrats in Albany said Tuesday.
Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins, D-Westchester, told reporters that both bills have the support of the conference and will come to the floor for a vote sometime in the near future, though the timing on that action is unclear at this point.
“I think we're very concerned that the federal government, our colleagues in Congress, have an opportunity to make sure the information they need is available to them,” Stewart-Cousins said of Trump's tax returns. “To the extent that we can or must be helpful, we are certainly willing to consider that and obviously, with the attorney general, things that would be helpful for her doing her job, we want to be able to help.”
Both bills were inspired by Trump, who has decided against releasing his tax returns to Congress and the public, while also hinting that he could issue pardons for individuals in his inner circle charged by federal prosecutors, including Special Counsel Robert Mueller III.
The first bill gained momentum Tuesday after it passed its first committee vote in the State Senate, where it's sponsored by state Sen. Brad Hoylman, D-Manhattan. Hoylman said the legislation has garnered support from his colleagues in the upper chamber since he introduced it earlier this month.
“It's my third bite at the apple, I guess, and this is the one that seems to have widespread support in the Senate, I hope in the Assembly, and at least some support from Gov. [Andrew] Cuomo,” Hoylman said.
It's one of three bills that Hoylman has sponsored to seek Trump's tax returns in some capacity, none of which have been approved by the Legislature as of yet. The bill approved in committee on Tuesday appears to have gained the most support from Democrats in both chambers.
The legislation would allow the chairpersons of the U.S. House Ways and Means Committee, the U.S. Senate Finance Committee, and the Joint Committee on Taxation to request the president's state tax returns if they've already tried to obtain his federal filings from the U.S. Treasury Department.
It would not require the agency to hand over those documents; that would be at the discretion of the commissioner of the state Department of Taxation and Finance, Hoylman said. They wouldn't be made public as part of the exchange, according to the legislation.
Members of Congress also wouldn't be able to request the president's returns immediately or for any purpose. They would only be allowed to do so if there was a legitimate, legislative purpose and if the IRS has already rejected a request for the president's tax documents.
It fits the mold for the type of action Trump could seek to block through litigation if it becomes law. Trump, late Monday, sought through a lawsuit to block two banks from cooperating with a subpoena from Democrats in Congress seeking information on his finances. Hoylman argued on Tuesday that Trump would have no legal grounds to sue over his bill, or any results thereof.
“I'm not passing this bill in anticipation of a lawsuit, or not, and I don't know what the grounds of such a lawsuit would be,” Hoylman said. “If we pass the bill that allows the state Tax Department to share these returns with one of these committees, as I've said, it's a routine practice in other instances.”
Attorneys for Trump, who represent him in the litigation involving the congressional subpoenas, did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the legislation.
The second bill would change the state's laws on so-called “double jeopardy,” which prevents state prosecutors, including the attorney general's office, from charging individuals pardoned of federal crimes based on the same set of facts. The bill is written in a way that would only allow state charges to be brought against a pardoned individual with direct ties to Trump, either through his family, their work on his campaign, or their work in the White House.
The bill would not be retroactive, so individuals who have already gone to trial would not be eligible for state charges. State Sen. Todd Kaminsky, D-Nassau, said the urgency for the law to change has grown since the end of the Mueller investigation last month.
“I think the need for it has grown even more since the Mueller report has come out because it's been clear that witnesses have spoken under the penalty of perjury by saying [they] were told don't worry, you'll be taken care of,” Kaminsky said. “Which, I think, shows a use of pardon power that in the most generous reading, is problematic and could be considered corrupt.”
Neither bill has gained the same momentum in the State Assembly, where members have been more cautious about coalescing behind the legislation. Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie, D-Bronx, said members in his chamber haven't met to discuss the tax returns bill, which is sponsored by Assemblyman David Buchwald, D-Westchester.
“We haven't conferenced that,” Heastie said.
The legislation concerning double jeopardy was discussed by members last month and met swiftly with opposition, according to Assemblyman Joseph Lentol, D-Brooklyn, who sponsors the bill. Members were concerned that the legislation focused too narrowly on Trump, Lentol said. Heastie confirmed the hesitation of members over the proposal to reporters this week.
“Double jeopardy is a very serious issue and I think for members they understood the attorney general's position, but double jeopardy is a very serious thing to make changes to,” Heastie said. “But we're still engaging. There's been no final decision yet as to what happens to that bill.”
Lawmakers have seven weeks after Wednesday to approve both bills and send them to the governor for a signature before they're scheduled to leave Albany for the year in June.
READ MORE:
Trump Family, Businesses Sue Banks to Block Congressional Subpoenas
NY Democrats Split on Legislation to Close 'Double Jeopardy Loophole'
Trump Could Be Forced to Disclose Tax Returns Under Proposed NY Laws
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPrivate Equity Giant KKR Refiles SDNY Countersuit in DOJ Premerger Filing Row
3 minute readSkadden and Steptoe, Defending Amex GBT, Blasts Biden DOJ's Antitrust Lawsuit Over Merger Proposal
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250