Reports of NY Insurers Overcharging Consumers for Drugs Prompt DFS Guidance
The state Department of Financial Services said in the guidance that so-called gag clauses, which prevent pharmacists from providing pricing information to insured consumers, have compounded the problem.
May 01, 2019 at 12:28 PM
3 minute read
Some consumers in New York may be paying a higher co-payment for a prescription drug than the actual price of that medication, which prompted a state agency in New York to issue guidance this week aiming to prevent the practice.
The state Department of Financial Services said that so-called gag clauses, which prevent pharmacists from providing pricing information to insured consumers, have compounded the problem.
Those clauses, according to acting DFS Superintendent Linda Lacewell, violate New York's insurance laws.
“DFS expects insurers to take immediate steps to make sure that consumers are being treated fairly and that they are not being ripped off when they buy prescription medication,” Lacewell said. “Consumers should not be penalized when buying medications with a retail price that is lower than the amount of the co-pay and should only be paying the lower retail price.”
The guidance was issued after the agency was contacted by pharmacists who said co-payments were being charged to consumers, in some cases, that were higher than the retail price of the drug. Some pharmacists have said they weren't able to tell consumers about the discrepancy because of gag clauses in contracts between pharmacy benefit managers and insurers.
Insurers are prohibited under New York's insurance and public health laws from requiring consumers to pay a co-payment that exceeds the price of a drug, according to DFS. The agency has also received reports that pharmacy benefit managers have threatened to take retaliatory actions against pharmacists who tell consumers that their co-pay is higher than the price of the drug.
“Insurers are responsible for complying with New York State laws regardless of whether they contract with third parties, such as pharmacy benefit managers, to administer policy benefits,” Lacewell said. “Consumers have every right to ask about and receive information about prescription drug pricing and to be charged fairly.”
DFS wrote in a letter to insurers this week that if they continued to receive reports of unlawful conduct by insurers, pharmacy benefit managers or any other agents, the agency will take action.
READ MORE:
DFS Superintendent Lacewell Appoints New Consumer Protection Head
Cuomo Nominates Linda Lacewell to Be NY's Top Financial Regulator
Who Is Linda Lacewell, Cuomo's Rumored Replacement to Head DFS?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMayor's Advisory Committee To Hold Hearing on Fitness of Judicial Candidates
2 minute readMayor's Advisory Committee To Hold Hearing on Fitness of Judicial Candidates
1 minute readMayor's Advisory Committee To Hold Hearing on Fitness of Judicial Candidates
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250