DFS Fines Insurers for Granting Religious Exemptions to Non-Religious Employers
A handful of insurance companies will now pay a collective fine of $509,000 after allowing the exemption for more than 30 entities that were not religious in nature, including a wood floor refinisher, a chimney cleaning service, a tax consultant and others.
May 03, 2019 at 03:52 PM
4 minute read
Some employers in New York have been granted religious exemptions to the state's mandate on providing contraceptive coverage by insurance companies, despite not qualifying for that status, the state Department of Financial Services said Friday.
A handful of insurance companies will now pay a collective fine of $509,000 after allowing the exemption for more than 30 entities that were not religious in nature, including a wood floor refinisher, a chimney-cleaning service, a tax consultant and others.
The agency also issued a guidance Friday reminding insurers that final rules issued by a handful of federal agencies do not preempt the state's insurance law, which requires coverage for contraception in most cases. Acting DFS Superintendent Linda Lacewell said the agency will continue to monitor companies to ensure they're complying with the statute.
“New York's health insurers are on notice that DFS will take all actions necessary to protect healthcare consumers from insurers that fail to adhere to New York State's statutory and regulatory requirements, including for contraceptive coverage,” Lacewell said. “Today's guidance also serves as a strong reminder to New York-regulated insurers that recent federal rules regarding exemptions on the basis of religious beliefs do not preempt robust consumer protections provided by state law.”
An investigation by the agency found that 10 health insurance companies, including Aetna Inc. and Oxford Health Plans, improperly granted religious employer exemption requests to more than 30 entities that did not meet the requirements of the label. Oxford, according to DFS, granted the most exemptions to entities that were not religious employers.
A spokeswoman for Oxford, which is operated by UnitedHealthcare Inc., said the approvals were unintentional and that they would work with the state to ensure future compliance.
“We regret that we made this unintentional error that impacted some of our members and are working with the state to ensure compliance with religious employer exemption guidance going forward,” the spokeswoman said.
Representatives for Aetna did not immediately comment on the claims. The companies, along with the other alleged violators, signed consent orders with DFS to resolve the matter.
The insurers agreed to contact all members of insurance plans who should have received notice of the rider coverage and to pay restitution for the violations. Each entity was ordered to pay a different amount based on the extent of the claims against them.
They were also ordered to reimburse members who were denied coverage and therefore had to pay out of pocket for contraception. Going forward, they'll have to create a new review process for assessing future religious exemption requests to make sure they're not granting one to an employer that does not meet the definition under state law.
Companies are not allowed to self-certify themselves as eligible for a religious exemption, the agency said. In order to qualify, the business has to be a nonprofit that serves and employees people sharing its religious values with the purpose of impressing those ideas. In other words, they have to be a strictly religious organization.
A handful of federal agencies, last year, issued final rules that provided an exemption from the contraceptive coverage mandate in the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare. That does not trounce the state's law mandating insurers to provide such coverage, the agency said Friday.
The other insurers accused of improperly granting religious exemptions included Crystal Run Health Plan LLC, Crystal Run Health Insurance Company Inc., Capital District Physicians' Health Plan Universal Benefits, HealthNow New York Inc., Independent Health Association Inc. and Independent Health Benefits Corp.
READ MORE:
Judge Green-Lights NY Regulators' Lawsuit Against Federal Agency Over Fintech Charters
Reports of NY Insurers Overcharging Consumers for Drugs Prompt DFS Guidance
DFS Superintendent Lacewell Appoints New Consumer Protection Head
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhy Wait? Arbitrate! The Value of Consenting to Arbitrate Your SUM Cases at NAM
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
Testing The Limits of “I Agree”: Court of Appeals Examines Clickwrap Arbitration Agreements
13 minute readAntitrust Yearly Recap: Aggressive Changes By The Biden Administration Precede President Trump’s Return
14 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250