NY Bill Would Bar Life Insurers From Eyeing Applicants' Opioid-Blocker Prescriptions
Democrats in the state Legislature are expected to move a bill on Monday to prohibit life insurance companies from denying coverage to individuals, including nurses, who are prescribed opioid-reversal medications, like Naloxone or Narcan.
May 06, 2019 at 04:12 PM
5 minute read
Some nurses who have been prescribed medication to counteract the effects of an opioid overdose, in order to use that drug on people who may need it in public, have been denied life insurance coverage by companies because of that prescription, according to lawmakers and advocacy groups.
That's why Democrats in the state Legislature moved a bill Monday to prohibit life insurance companies from denying coverage to individuals, including nurses, who are prescribed opioid-reversal medications, like Naloxone or Narcan.
The bill, Monday afternoon, passed the State Senate, where it's sponsored by State Sen. Pete Harckham, D-Westchester. Harckham said the bill was inspired by a group of nurses that approached lawmakers about the issue.
Some individuals in the profession seek a prescription for opioid blockers to carry with them in hospitals, schools or even in public when they're off the clock. But that came with an unintended surprise when they went to purchase life insurance, Harckham said.
“What happened was, when they went to apply for life insurance, it showed up on their list of prescriptions and they were being denied life insurance because of this prescription they carry to help the public,” Harckham said. “That's discrimination that we can't tolerate.”
Life insurance companies screen individuals to find what medications they've been prescribed before approving them for coverage. Those companies have, in some instances, denied coverage for individuals who they see have been prescribed opioid-reversal drugs, regardless of why they were given such a prescription, Harckham said.
The bill, while targeted at nurses, would prohibit life insurance companies from denying coverage to any individual who seeks a prescription for opioid-reversal medication. That could be a teacher, emergency responder, family member or any other individual who has such a prescription.
Assemblywoman Linda B. Rosenthal, D-Manhattan, sponsors the bill in her chamber. She chided life insurance companies for the practice, which advocates at the capitol on Monday said was fairly commonplace among nurses who may not have union-provided benefits.
“It's just ridiculous. It's another money-grab,” Rosenthal said. “There's no basis in fact, there's no reason to deny these people life insurance, especially nurses who put their lives and their health on the line to do their utmost for their patients.”
Rosenthal said she expects the bill to pass in the Assembly, but that her colleagues haven't yet had the chance to fully consider it. The legislation was amended and recommitted to the insurance committee in the chamber on Friday.
“It's been recently introduced, so we take a little longer at times,” Rosenthal said. “So, we have to go through committee.”
Rosenthal and Harckham were joined at a press event by members of the New York State Nurses Association, including Tara Martin, the group's state political director. Martin said, depending on what kind of practice a nurse is working in, they could be asked to seek a prescription for Naloxone or Narcan as a preventative measure.
“I can't tell you how many times we run into nurses who have actually had to save a person's life—not in a hospital, but in a parking lot because someone is overdosing in a car somewhere,” Martin said. “We don't practice just in the walls of our hospital, we practice wherever we go.”
The prescription can also be used in the event that a nurse, or other individual, unintentionally comes in contact with opioids, Martin said. There are some situations where having contact, alone, with certain opioids can be harmful.
“Some of this stuff can be absorbed through the skin,” Martin said. “So, if a nurse is working on you and you're dealing with an overdose situation, there's a strong possibility that you can get direct contact, and that's very problematic in our industry.”
The Life Insurance Council of New York, the trade association representing life insurance companies in the state, said in a statement Monday that it was not opposed to the bill.
“LICONY applauds the nurses and Good Samaritans who play a valuable role in protecting vulnerable members of their communities from opioid overdoses every day,” the group said. “Our organization has no objections to this bill, since we believe that it largely reflects the practices already being utilized by our life insurance company members.”
Lawmakers in the Assembly will have the next seven weeks to consider the bill before they're scheduled to leave Albany for the year in June.
READ MORE:
DFS Fines Insurers for Granting Religious Exemptions to Non-Religious Employers
Judge Green-Lights NY Regulators' Lawsuit Against Federal Agency Over Fintech Charters
Reports of NY Insurers Overcharging Consumers for Drugs Prompt DFS Guidance
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readHochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
Court System Names New Administrative Judges for New York City Courts in Leadership Shakeup
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250