Ex-Felons Could Be Eligible for Jury Duty Under NY Bill That Has Cleared Senate
New York state could soon allow those convicted of felonies who have served out their entire sentence to be selected for jury duty after the State Senate approved a bill this week that would allow that change.
May 08, 2019 at 05:00 PM
3 minute read
New York state could soon allow those convicted of felonies who have served out their entire sentence to be selected for jury duty after the State Senate approved a bill this week that would allow that change.
The legislation has also moved through committee in the Assembly this year, though Democrats who control the chamber haven't yet scheduled it for a vote on the floor.
State Sen. Brian Benjamin, D-Manhattan, sponsors the bill in the Senate, which is also led by Democrats this year for the first time in nearly a decade. He said the bill is intended to treat those convicted of felonies who've served their time like any other member of society.
“When people have made mistakes and served their time, they've been rehabilitated. When they reenter society they should be able to participate fully in our democracy,” Benjamin said. “Serving on juries and being able to vote are both part of being equal, full citizens in a free democracy.”
The bill is a simple, one-sentence change to the state's judiciary laws concerning who qualifies to be a juror in New York. The law currently imposes a lifetime ban on anyone who's been convicted of a felony from serving on a jury. Jurors also have to be an adult citizen of the U.S. who can communicate and understand English.
Benjamin's bill would change the law to eliminate the lifetime ban on jury service for convicted felons. The law would, instead, read that “if convicted of a felony, have completed any sentencing related to such conviction, including any period of probation or community supervision,” a person would qualify as a juror.
As the bill language says, a potential juror with a felony conviction would have to complete their entire sentence in order to qualify. An individual who is no longer incarcerated, but is still on probation, would not qualify, for example.
Republicans in the Senate were critical of the legislation this week, arguing that it would be unlikely for a convicted felon to be an impartial juror.
“Justice redefined by Senate Democrats means ignoring the pain and suffering of crime victims, their families, the public, and law enforcement to deliver perks for the most violent criminals,” said Senate Republican Leader John Flanagan. “How could Democrats believe that Judith Clark, a terrorist who killed two police officers and a security guard, would be an impartial juror?”
The bill was approved largely along party lines, with 36 votes in favor of the legislation in the 63-member chamber. It's been passed out of committee in the Assembly, meaning it could be brought to the floor by Democrats at any time for a vote.
The lower house will have the next six weeks to consider the bill before they're scheduled to leave Albany for the year in June.
READ MORE:
Bill Allowing 'Elder Parole' Consideration for Older Inmates Gains Momentum in NY
Weinstein Among First to Cite New Law Allowing Reduction in Drug Sentences
NY Court of Appeals Set to Eye Alleged Withholding of Evidence in Murder Trial of John Giuca
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit
4 minute readRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
Trending Stories
- 1Data Breaches in UK Legal Sector Surge, According to ICO Data
- 2PayPal Faces New Round of Claims; This Time Alleging Its 'Honey' Browser Extension Cheated Consumers
- 3Fired NLRB Member Seeks Reinstatement, Challenges President's Removal Power
- 4NY Inspector General Announces Attorneys Hired to Lead Upstate Region and Gaming
- 5Carol-Lisa Phillips to Rise to Broward Chief Judge as Jack Tuter Weighs Next Move
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250