Bill To Regulate 'Lawsuit Lending' Companies in NY Gains Momentum
The State Senate Consumer Protection Committee on Tuesday approved the Consumer Litigation Funding Act, which seeks to establish New York's first regulations for lawsuit lending companies.
May 14, 2019 at 06:20 PM
4 minute read
Lawmakers in New York are one step closer to establishing regulations for the state's “lawsuit lending” industry, which provides financing for litigants to seek legal help on a number of matters.
The State Senate Consumer Protection Committee on Tuesday approved the Consumer Litigation Funding Act, which seeks to establish the state's first regulations for companies that finance lawsuits.
The legislation would require those companies to register with the state in order to operate in New York and establish protections for consumers who seek their business. Among those protections are certain contract requirements, like language that's easily understandable to consumers, and a right to cancel the agreement at no cost within 10 days of its execution.
The bill would also preclude consumer litigation funding companies from offering commissions or referral fees to attorneys. The reverse would also be true: Those companies would not be allowed to accept payments from attorneys for exchanging business. Companies that violate the law could be subject to a $5,000 penalty for each violation, according to the bill.
State Sen. Anna Kaplan, D-Nassau, sponsors the bill in the Senate, and said regulations over the industry are long overdue.
“It is something I truly believe in and I think it's long overdue to have some sort of monitoring program to make sure our residents are being protected,” Kaplan said after the vote Tuesday.
It's the first time the bill has moved this year since Kaplan introduced it in March. It has yet to be considered in the State Assembly, where Assemblyman William Magnarelli, D-Syracuse, is its sponsor.
Kaplan said Tuesday that since introducing the bill, she's heard from several stakeholders on the issue, who have sought to change the legislation. She did not say who those stakeholders were specifically, but said the bill might be amended before it's taken up for a full floor vote in the Senate.
“I have gotten a lot of calls in regard to this bill … a lot of stakeholders who have reached out, and I'm working with them,” Kaplan said. “There might be some amendments with this bill but we're working on it.”
Among those stakeholders is the American Legal Finance Association, a trade association representing consumer litigation funding companies across the country. Kelly Gilroy, executive director of ALFA, said the group is looking forward to working with Kaplan to strengthen the bill in the coming weeks.
“As evidenced by our work to implement regulation and licensure in other states across the country, ALFA is committed to upholding high standards for the consumer legal funding industry to protect consumers and preserve access to pre-settlement advances,” Gilroy said. “Consumer legal funding is a valuable product that allows many people to pursue justice through our legal system, regardless of their financial means.”
The bill was previously sponsored by Sen. Robert Ortt, R-North Tonawanda, last year in the Senate, where it passed the chamber. It didn't come up for a vote in the Assembly at the time.
The Lawsuit Reform Alliance, an advocacy group that aims to reduce litigation in New York, hailed the bill's movement in the Senate in a statement Tuesday.
“Today's action to advance a bill to combat predatory lawsuit lending is an important first step to ensure that vulnerable New Yorkers are no longer exploited by this unregulated sector of the finance industry,” said Tom Stebbins, executive director or LRANY. “To further reduce harm to individuals and protect the integrity of the civil justice system, the bill also ensures that lawyers do not have overlapping financial interest in lending outfits, or arrangements to collect lucrative referral fees.”
They've claimed, as have the bill's sponsors, that some have used the industry as a money-making scheme to encourage litigation where individuals might not have sought that option in the past. Reports have claimed that some companies have even tried to cash in on the growing #MeToo sexual harassment movement by encouraging specific individuals to seek financing for litigation against their alleged harassers.
Lawmakers in both chambers have the next five weeks to amend the bill and send it to the floor for a vote, before they're scheduled to leave Albany for the year in June.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Weil Practice Leaders Expected to Leave for Paul Weiss, Latham
- 2Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 3Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 4Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 5Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250