Bill To Regulate 'Lawsuit Lending' Companies in NY Gains Momentum
The State Senate Consumer Protection Committee on Tuesday approved the Consumer Litigation Funding Act, which seeks to establish New York's first regulations for lawsuit lending companies.
May 14, 2019 at 06:20 PM
4 minute read
Lawmakers in New York are one step closer to establishing regulations for the state's “lawsuit lending” industry, which provides financing for litigants to seek legal help on a number of matters.
The State Senate Consumer Protection Committee on Tuesday approved the Consumer Litigation Funding Act, which seeks to establish the state's first regulations for companies that finance lawsuits.
The legislation would require those companies to register with the state in order to operate in New York and establish protections for consumers who seek their business. Among those protections are certain contract requirements, like language that's easily understandable to consumers, and a right to cancel the agreement at no cost within 10 days of its execution.
The bill would also preclude consumer litigation funding companies from offering commissions or referral fees to attorneys. The reverse would also be true: Those companies would not be allowed to accept payments from attorneys for exchanging business. Companies that violate the law could be subject to a $5,000 penalty for each violation, according to the bill.
State Sen. Anna Kaplan, D-Nassau, sponsors the bill in the Senate, and said regulations over the industry are long overdue.
“It is something I truly believe in and I think it's long overdue to have some sort of monitoring program to make sure our residents are being protected,” Kaplan said after the vote Tuesday.
It's the first time the bill has moved this year since Kaplan introduced it in March. It has yet to be considered in the State Assembly, where Assemblyman William Magnarelli, D-Syracuse, is its sponsor.
Kaplan said Tuesday that since introducing the bill, she's heard from several stakeholders on the issue, who have sought to change the legislation. She did not say who those stakeholders were specifically, but said the bill might be amended before it's taken up for a full floor vote in the Senate.
“I have gotten a lot of calls in regard to this bill … a lot of stakeholders who have reached out, and I'm working with them,” Kaplan said. “There might be some amendments with this bill but we're working on it.”
Among those stakeholders is the American Legal Finance Association, a trade association representing consumer litigation funding companies across the country. Kelly Gilroy, executive director of ALFA, said the group is looking forward to working with Kaplan to strengthen the bill in the coming weeks.
“As evidenced by our work to implement regulation and licensure in other states across the country, ALFA is committed to upholding high standards for the consumer legal funding industry to protect consumers and preserve access to pre-settlement advances,” Gilroy said. “Consumer legal funding is a valuable product that allows many people to pursue justice through our legal system, regardless of their financial means.”
The bill was previously sponsored by Sen. Robert Ortt, R-North Tonawanda, last year in the Senate, where it passed the chamber. It didn't come up for a vote in the Assembly at the time.
The Lawsuit Reform Alliance, an advocacy group that aims to reduce litigation in New York, hailed the bill's movement in the Senate in a statement Tuesday.
“Today's action to advance a bill to combat predatory lawsuit lending is an important first step to ensure that vulnerable New Yorkers are no longer exploited by this unregulated sector of the finance industry,” said Tom Stebbins, executive director or LRANY. “To further reduce harm to individuals and protect the integrity of the civil justice system, the bill also ensures that lawyers do not have overlapping financial interest in lending outfits, or arrangements to collect lucrative referral fees.”
They've claimed, as have the bill's sponsors, that some have used the industry as a money-making scheme to encourage litigation where individuals might not have sought that option in the past. Reports have claimed that some companies have even tried to cash in on the growing #MeToo sexual harassment movement by encouraging specific individuals to seek financing for litigation against their alleged harassers.
Lawmakers in both chambers have the next five weeks to amend the bill and send it to the floor for a vote, before they're scheduled to leave Albany for the year in June.
READ MORE:
NY Assembly Expected to Give Final Passage to Trump-Targeted 'Double Jeopardy' Bill
NY Lawmakers Approve Legislation to Curb Gravity Knife Prosecutions
Legislation to Allow Family Contact After Termination of Parental Rights Expected to Move
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit
4 minute readRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250