Manafort Lender Calk Charged With Bribery in Pursuit of Administration Position
Federal authorities in Manhattan say the bank CEO attempted to extend $16 million in loans to Manafort in exchange for help securing a high-profile spot in the new administration.
May 23, 2019 at 11:02 AM
5 minute read
Stephen Calk, the CEO of Federal Savings Bank of Chicago and a economic adviser to Donald Trump during his 2016 presidential campaign, was charged with institutional bribery by federal authorities in Manhattan on Thursday, for allegedly extending $16 million in loans to former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort.
In exchange for the loans, Calk allegedly asked Manafort for assistance securing a high-ranking position, such as secretary of the Army, in the new administration.
In a statement, FBI Assistant Director William Sweeney Jr. said Calk went to “great lengths to avoid banking violations” as part of the alleged scheme.
“His attempt at petitioning for political favors was unsuccessful in more ways than one—he didn't get the job he wanted, and he compromised the one he had,” Sweeney said.
Calk's name became connected to the broader set of investigations into Trump associates during Manafort's first trial, in which the former Trump campaign chairman was charged with multiple crimes in connection to the $16 million loan from Calk's bank. Ultimately, jurors failed to deliver a guilty verdict on those charges.
According to prosecutors in Manhattan, beginning in July 2016, two months after being promoted to Trump campaign chairman and chief strategist, Manafort approached Calk's bank for loans to help him avoid foreclosure on multiple properties owned by the Manafort family.
Prosecutors claim Calk saw in Manafort an opportunity to gain traction with the Trump campaign and, later, in the Trump administration. At Calk's direction, the bank began extending Manafort a line of credit that started at $5.7 million and was increased over time. At one point, in October 2016, Manafort allegedly emailed Calk to ask for an additional $1 million in credit on the proposed loan that was then up to $8.2 million.
“I look to your cleverness on how to manage the underwriting,” Manafort allegedly wrote Calk in an email.
The bank CEO came through: the proposed loan to Manafort was increased to $9.2 million, prosecutors said.
Even as Calk was increasing Manafort's line of credit, bank officials were raising concerns over Manafort's creditworthiness. Prosecutors claim bank personnel first learned that the property in Los Angeles Manafort allegedly sought the funds for was itself in default and in the process of being foreclosed on. An underwriter at the bank memorialized concerns about Manafort, including the inability to verify his stated income and a $300,000 credit card delinquency.
Eventually these red flags were too much for even Calk to overcome at Federal Savings Bank of Chicago, which, through its president, refused to allow the loan to proceed. That didn't dampen Calk's efforts to help Manafort. The loan officer, with Calk's backing, sought the backing from a different financial institution to approve a restructured loan for the president's former campaign chairman.
After Trump's election in 2016, Calk was able to handle the situation on his own, and his bank approved Manafort's loan of $9.5 million. Shortly after, Calk began pushing Manafort on possible roles he could play in the new administration. According to prosecutors, Calk sent Manafort a list of possible roles, including Secretary of the Treasury, Commerce, Army, or Defense. He also flagged 19 ambassadorships he was interested in, including the United Kingdom, France, Germany and Italy.
After Trump's election, while he was pursuing positions inside the administration, Calk pushed for an additional $6.5 million loan for Manafort, which he was in need of to keep a property in Brooklyn from also being foreclosed on. At the same time, Manafort flagged Calk's name as a recommendation for Secretary of the Army to transition team officials.
Calk was not offered a position in the Trump administration.
Calk is being represented by Loeb & Loeb white-collar criminal defense and investigations co-chairman Jeremy Margolis. In a statement, Margolis pushed back on the government's narrative, claiming that the loans provided to Manafort were “good loans,” and that providing them to Trump's former campaign chairman “had nothing whatsoever to do with Mr. Calk's desire to serve” in the administration.
“Mr. Calk has done nothing wrong and will be exonerated at trial of the baseless isolated charge brought against him,” Margolis said. “Those loans simply were not a bribe for anything. ”
In an attached statement, the Federal Savings Bank noted that there was no suggestion of wrongdoing by the bank itself in the charges against Calk. Both Margolis' statement regarding his client and the statement provided by the bank itself stated that both former Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation and the federal judge overseeing Manafort's criminal trial determined the bank was Manafort's victim.
U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman of the Southern District of New York is recused from the prosecution, which is being overseen by senior counsel Audrey Strauss.
Following a trial in Virginia and a guilty plea in Washington, D.C., Manafort is set to serve more than seven years in federal prison.
Related:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Partner Presented With State Bar's Scheindlin Award
'A World of Credit': Ex-FTX Executive Gary Wang Sentenced to Time Served Following Cooperation
Manhattan Prosecutors Say They Will Oppose Efforts by Trump Legal Team to Dismiss Case
Trending Stories
- 1Democrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal with GOP
- 2Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 3Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 4Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
- 5UN Treaty Enacting Cybercrime Standards Likely to Face Headwinds in US, Other Countries
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250