NY Lawmakers Seek Changes to Strengthen Sexual Harassment Laws
State lawmakers in New York held their second hearing in nearly three decades on the topic of workplace sexual harassment, which the Legislature could address through policy changes over the next four weeks.
May 24, 2019 at 03:45 PM
6 minute read
State lawmakers in New York held just their second hearing in nearly three decades Friday on the topic of workplace sexual harassment, which the Legislature could address through policy changes over the next four weeks.
The issue has increasingly come to the forefront of public discussion in New York, where the state's Division of Human Rights testified on Friday that the number of sexual harassment complaints with the agency has increased by 62 percent since 2016.
And that number is expected to rise, representatives from the agency said during their testimony at the hearing. Deputy Commissioner Gina Martinez said they're gearing up to launch an extensive outreach campaign about the state's laws and enforcement power, which she said will likely increase the number of complaints they receive.
They annually review more than 6,000 discrimination complaints, including those involving sexual harassment, according to the agency. Another uptick could create a need for more investigators at each of their 12 regional offices, Martinez said.
“The more outreach and education we do, I have a feeling that our 6,000 is going to skyrocket,” Martinez said. “We are, right now, planning robust outreach and education throughout the state.”
But what was missing at the hearing, lawmakers said, was input from the agency's representatives on what changes to the state's laws would best help curb the problem.
When asked on several different occasions about specific policy proposals that are being considered by the Legislature, two deputy commissioners from the agency declined to take a position and said they had to stay neutral because of the nature of their work. The agency handles complaints of sexual harassment administratively from victims statewide.
After a few instances of being told the agency wasn't going to take a position on any of their legislative proposals, lawmakers began to criticize those officials for holding back.
“I would really encourage you, because we would like to be your partners in this fight. It's an incredibly important effort, to please weigh in on the package of legislation we've put forward, because we can't wait any longer,” said state Sen. Alessandra Biaggi, D-Westchester.
Biaggi chairs the Senate Ethics and Internal Governance Committee and has been a leader among her colleagues in pushing for hearings on sexual harassment this year. She replaced former state Sen. Jeffrey Klein, D-Bronx, who was accused of sexually harassing a staffer before he was voted out of office last year.
There are a host of legislative recommendations intended to address the problem of workplace sexual harassment that have been proposed by state lawmakers this year, particularly after the first hearing on the issue in February.
Democrats have largely worked on those ideas with the Sexual Harassment Working Group, an advocacy group formed in recent years by former state government staffers who claim to have faced sexual harassment from lawmakers or other employees. They rallied with Democrats before Friday's hearing and earlier this week in Albany.
Lawmakers who have partnered with the group are seeking to change both the threshold under which someone could bring litigation over sexual harassment and eliminate a commonly used defense by attorneys to dismiss those claims. Lawmakers have yet to make progress on either proposal this year.
New York currently has a “severe or pervasive” standard for sexual harassment, meaning that the alleged behavior has to be one of the two to merit litigation. Advocates have argued that the standard holds those cases to a threshold that's, sometimes, impossible to meet, even if a victim feels the behavior is inappropriate or predatory.
State law also currently allows what's called the Faragher-Ellerth defense, which is commonly used by employers to dismiss claims of sexual harassment.
The defense was created from two different U.S. Supreme Court decisions. Those rulings found an employer is not liable for sexual harassment if it can show the employee didn't follow the employer's policy for addressing inappropriate behavior, take the directed steps during an investigation, or comply with other standards established by that procedure.
Lawmakers currently have a bill that would address both of those provisions. The legislation would allow claims of sexual harassment to be brought “regardless of whether such harassment or hostile work environment is severe or pervasive,” according to the bill.
It would also lessen the power of the Faragher-Ellerth defense by making it clear that employees would not be precluded from bringing sexual harassment claims if they didn't follow their employer's procedure for handling such matters. Assemblywoman Aravella Simotas, D-Queens, sponsors the bill with Biaggi.
“This is not only unfair, it completely takes advantage of a power balance in a work environment by allowing employers who are aware of harassment to avoid taking meaningful actions to improve the environment,” Simotas said this week.
Lawmakers are pushing for a series of other bills on the issue as well, including one that would limit the reach of nondisclosure agreements and another that would extend the amount of time victims would be able to file sexual harassment complaints with the state.
Those complaints can currently be filed within one year of an incident; lawmakers want that extended to three. That's the same amount of time victims currently have to bring sexual harassment claims in state court, where they can choose to resolve matters through litigation rather than administratively.
Biaggi said earlier this week she was confident the bills would move before lawmakers leave Albany for the year next month, but that more legislation or amendments could be forthcoming as they continue to hear from stakeholders on the issue.
“I'm not making any promises, but I'm going to do my damned best to push them through,” Biaggi said.
This year's legislative session is scheduled to end on June 19.
READ MORE:
NY Lawmakers Consider How Best to Bolster Sexual Harassment Laws
NY Releases New Draft Sexual Harassment Prevention Policy for Employers
In #MeToo Era, New York Courts' New Sexual Misconduct Policy Was Done Too Quietly, Critics Charge
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Treasury GC Returns to Davis Polk to Co-Chair White-Collar Defense and Investigations Practice
- 2Decision of the Day: JFK to Paris Stowaway's Bail Revocation Explained
- 3Doug Emhoff, Husband of Former VP Harris, Lands at Willkie
- 4LexisNexis Announces Public Availability of Personalized AI Assistant Protégé
- 5Some Thoughts on What It Takes to Connect With Millennial Jurors
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250