Weinstein Attorney Says Global Settlement Reached in Sexual Harassment Litigation
An attorney representing Bob Weinstein in the litigation told a judge at a federal bankruptcy court in Delaware on Thursday that the parties had reached a deal to settle those claims, according to audio of the hearing obtained from the court docket
May 24, 2019 at 09:26 AM
4 minute read
Harvey Weinstein, his brother Bob Weinstein and their film company are said to have reached a global settlement over claims of sexual harassment and misconduct alleged by several women and the New York Attorney General's Office.
An attorney representing Bob Weinstein in the litigation told a judge at a federal bankruptcy court in Delaware on Thursday that the parties had reached a deal to settle those claims, according to audio of the hearing obtained from the court docket.
The deal is not final; attorneys will still have to present the agreement to the various courts where litigation against the Weinsteins and their company exists. Bob Weinstein was represented at the hearing by Adam Harris, a partner at Schulte Roth & Zabel.
Harris said they were close to reaching a global settlement at the end of last year but that the parties involved backed off from making a deal before it was resolved. They have since come back together through mediation and reached an agreement, he said.
“I'm pleased to report that the culmination of all those efforts and the hard-fought negotiations is that for the first time, as of yesterday … we now have an economic agreement in principle that's supported by the plaintiffs, the AG's office, the defendants, and all of the insurers, that if approved will provide significant compensation to victims, creditors of the state, and allow the parties to avoid years of costly, time consuming, and uncertain litigation on all sides,” Harris said. “Obviously that's the definition of what we think is a good settlement.”
The amount of the settlement, between all parties, is said to be as much as $44 million, according to news reports published late Thursday night. The settlement was first reported by the Wall Street Journal.
The agreement would mean a resolution of the New York Attorney General's litigation against the Weinsteins, who are alleged to have violated the state's civil rights laws by allowing persistent claims of sexual harassment and misconduct at their company to go unchecked over several years.
Representatives for New York Attorney General Letitia James did not immediately respond to a request to comment or for more information. A spokeswoman for the office had declined to comment to the Wall Street Journal.
But Harris did say during the hearing that the litigation from James' office could evolve in the near future. New York could soon file an amended lawsuit to include more defendants, he said. The litigation currently only involves Harvey Weinstein, Bob Weinstein and their film company.
“We've got the attorney general's investigation, which is a whole separate action that was filed, and the AG is looking at potentially filing an amended complaint there to include more potential defendants,” Harris said.
A lawyer representing the New York Attorney General's Office joined the hearing by phone but did not touch on the settlement agreement or the possibility of their lawsuit being amended in the near future. The name of the attorney was unintelligible on the audio.
Harris said during the hearing that he was optimistic with the outcome of the settlement but cautioned that it's not a done deal until the ink has dried in every venue where the Weinsteins face litigation. Those lawsuits have come from individuals in the U.S., Canada and even Europe.
“Personally, I am very optimistic, given everything the parties have been through to date, that we all now see that this is the right solution and now is the time to start working on the documentation without distraction in order to bring it to your honor and other courts for approval,” Harris said.
Harvey Weinstein is still facing charges of rape and committing a sexual act in New York, where Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance announced charges against him nearly a year ago.
This is a developing story.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAfter 2024's Regulatory Tsunami, Financial Services Firms Hope Storm Clouds Break
GC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
Trending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250