Cuomo Plans New Push to End 'Gay Panic' Defense by End of Session
A bill to prohibit defendants from using that defense has moved in the State Senate this year, but has yet to make it out of committee in the State Assembly.
May 28, 2019 at 04:52 PM
5 minute read
Legislation to end what's called the “gay panic” defense, which allows those facing murder charges to say their actions were driven by an extreme emotional disturbance incited by a victim's sexual orientation or gender identity, gained new momentum Tuesday with renewed support from Gov. Andrew Cuomo.
A bill to prohibit defendants from using that defense has moved in the state Senate this year, but has yet to make it out of committee in the state Assembly.
Cuomo, in a radio interview, called the defense “absurd” and included it in a list of his top priorities for the final four weeks of this year's legislative session. Lawmakers are scheduled to leave Albany for the year in June.
“End the 'gay panic' defense—which is absurd—that I panicked when I found out the person was gay and that's the justification for my crime,” Cuomo said.
Legislation to end the defense is carried in the state Senate by Sen. Brad Hoylman, D-Manhattan, who is both the chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee and the only openly gay members of the chamber. He welcomed the governor's support in an interview with the New York Law Journal.
“I think it's terrific that the governor is lending his support to ending the vestige of the last century—the antiquated notion that gay and transgender people are somehow deviants and to be blamed for their own murders,” Hoylman said. “It's past time that we struck this defense from our books.”
The legislation would not eliminate the ability for a defendant to say they were influenced by an extreme emotional disturbance in general, but it would set certain parameters on that defense. It would be prohibited when the defendant acted in response to the victim's sexual orientation, sex or gender, according to the bill.
“It shall not be an affirmative defense that the defendant acted under the influence of extreme emotional disturbance upon the discovery, knowledge or disclosure of the victim's sexual orientation, sex, gender or sex assigned at birth,” the bill reads.
That's intended to eliminate the “gay panic” defense, but the legislation also aims to prevent what's referred to as the “trans panic” defense. That's when a defendant uses a person's gender identity or status as a transgender individual to front an affirmative defense to murder charges.
Defendants would be precluded from using such a defense when faced with charges of murder in the first degree, murder in the second degree and aggravated murder.
It's not a new issue in the legal community. The American Bar Association approved a resolution in 2013 urging lawmakers, at both the federal and state levels, to pass legislation explicitly prohibiting both the “gay panic” and “trans panic” defenses. The LGBT Bar Association has largely led the movement to eliminate the defense.
Michael Miller, the current president of the New York State Bar Association, also came out against the defense in a statement to the New York Law Journal on Tuesday.
“NYSBA is deeply committed to ensuring equality under the law for all, and the 'gay panic' or 'trans panic' defense flies in the face of that idea,” Miller said.
Hoylman first sponsored the bill last year, but it failed to make it through committee when Republicans controlled the state Senate. This year, after Democrats took control of the chamber, it's moved out of committee and could come to the floor for a vote at any time.
But it has yet to move in the Assembly, where it's sponsored by Assemblyman Brian Barnwell, D-Queens. It's been stuck in the Codes Committee since Barnwell reintroduced it earlier this year.
A different version of the legislation is also carried by Assemblyman Daniel O'Donnell, D-Manhattan, who is a former public defender and openly gay member of the lower chamber. That version, which is also sponsored by Hoylman, hasn't moved in either chamber.
O'Donnell's bill would approach the issue in a different way, by saying that a nonviolent sexual advance or discovery of a person's sexual orientation or gender identity does not constitute a “reasonable explanation or excuse” for an extreme emotional disturbance. O'Donnell has carried that bill with Hoylman since 2015.
Cuomo first started to push for the defense to be eliminated last year, when he included the proposal in his executive budget. His support was inspired by the story of a transgender woman, Islan Nettles, who died in 2013 after she was struck by a man who discovered her gender identity.
He also included the proposal in this year's executive budget proposal, but it fell out of negotiations before the spending plan was approved by lawmakers at the end of March. The bill's supporters will have the next four weeks to convince their colleagues to approve the measure before this year's legislative session is scheduled to end in June.
READ MORE:
Cuomo Says Senate Votes Aren't There to Legalize Marijuana for Recreational Use in NY
NY Legislature OKs Bill to Release Trump's State Tax Returns to US Congress
NY Legislators Approve 'Double Jeopardy' Legislation Aimed at Trump Pardon Power
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit
4 minute readRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
Trending Stories
- 1Gunderson Dettmer Opens Atlanta Office With 3 Partners From Morris Manning
- 2Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 3Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 4Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 5Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250