Cuomo Says Senate Votes Aren't There to Legalize Marijuana for Recreational Use in NY
Gov. Andrew Cuomo was less than optimistic Tuesday that a newly amended bill to legalize marijuana in New York for adult, recreational use would pass this year, saying during a radio interview that the votes weren't there to approve the legislation in the State Senate.
May 28, 2019 at 01:12 PM
6 minute read
Gov. Andrew Cuomo expressed pessimism about the prospects for passage this year of a newly amended bill to legalize marijuana in New York for adult, recreational use, saying during a radio interview Tuesday that the votes weren't there to approve the legislation in the State Senate.
The comments from Cuomo—a supporter of wider legalization of marijuana—came after a coalition of defense attorney organizations publicly urged the Legislature to pass the new version of the bill, which would legalize the drug and allow low-level marijuana-related convictions to be expunged.
The bill, called the Marijuana Regulation and Taxation Act, was amended late May 24 by lawmakers who sponsor it to bring the measure closer in line with Cuomo's own proposal on marijuana legalization earlier this year.
They said they are hoping the new version wins the support of their colleagues, who have yet to coalesce around any of this year's proposals on the drug. Cuomo said the measure doesn't have enough support from Democrats in the State Senate to become law with less than four weeks left in this year's legislative session.
“The senators say on the record they don't have the votes to pass it politically, and I think that's the problem here, is the political reality that you don't have the votes in the Senate,” Cuomo said. “I support it. I proposed it. But we're getting down to the final three weeks or so and they're still saying they don't have the votes.”
Last week's amendment to the marijuana bill is a last-ditch effort by its sponsors to convince other lawmakers that marijuana legalization should happen this year. Assembly Majority Leader Crystal Peoples-Stokes, a Democrat from Buffalo who sponsors the bill, was confident last week that it could happen before they're scheduled to leave next month.
“I quite frankly think this is doable,” Peoples-Stokes said. “We have 20 days, we can get this done, and that's my plan.”
The new version reflects what was negotiated earlier in the year between Cuomo and state lawmakers before the legislation was dropped from the state budget. But there is one glaring difference between the two versions that's of particular interest to defense attorneys.
The newly amended bill is written to allow the expungement of low-level marijuana-related convictions, while Cuomo's proposal would have only permitted those records to be sealed. The former option essentially erases the record from ever existing, while the latter would allow those convictions to still be seen by certain members of law enforcement.
The Cuomo administration has previously told lawmakers that allowing expungement, rather than sealing, would require an amendment to the state constitution. That process can't be done immediately; it requires two votes by the Legislature and approval from voters. Alphonso David, Cuomo's counsel, has said legislation allowing expungement may not survive a legal challenge.
Cuomo in his radio appearance said he would still support the bill, even if it was written to include expungement, rather than his initial proposal to seal those records.
“I don't think this is the deal-breaker issue,” Cuomo said. “I don't think it's gonna be on the merits. I think it's on the politics.”
While it may not be the central conflict on the legislation between Cuomo and lawmakers, the expungement provision was a top reason the bill won support Tuesday from defense attorney groups. They said in a joint statement that the legislation would provide new opportunities for those who currently have a permanent stain on their criminal records.
The statement was issued jointly by the Legal Aid Society, New York County Defender Services, Brooklyn Defender Services, the Bronx Defenders, and Neighborhood Defender Service of Harlem.
“New York State's failed war on marijuana still ensnares thousands of our clients—nearly all of whom are black and Latinx—and other New Yorkers across the state each year, resulting in needless incarceration and a host of other devastating consequences,” the groups said. “The [bill] brings justice to New York State by ending prohibition, expunging conviction records that have curtailed the opportunities of countless predominately young black and Latinx New Yorkers.”
They also saw the legislation as another step in this year's reforms to the state's criminal justice system. Lawmakers previously approved major changes to the state's laws on cash bail, criminal discovery, and the right to a speedy trial. Legalizing marijuana and allowing low-level convictions to be erased would support those efforts, the groups said.
“Governor Cuomo and the Legislature enacted historic reforms to our bail, discovery, and speedy trial statutes earlier this year, and they must build on that success by enacting the MRTA into law this session,” they said.
Members of law enforcement, including the New York Sheriffs Association, previously came out against legalization this year, citing concerns over road safety. They asked lawmakers, at the time, to include funding for more personnel and training on drug recognition in the bill.
The new legislation, according to its text, would allow some grants to be made to state and local law enforcement agencies, though there's no designated amount.
Lawmakers return to Albany this week for the final four weeks of what's expected to be a marathon end of the legislation session. If Cuomo and lawmakers agree to legalize marijuana during that time, the measure would likely pass sometime during the last few days of this year's session, which is scheduled to end June 19.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250