Former AstraZeneca Sales Rep Files Lawsuit Charging Drugmaker With Pregnancy Discrimination
Managers at the international drug company allegedly fired the seven-year veteran a month after learning she was pregnant, for reasons the plaintiff claims were pretextual.
May 28, 2019 at 02:38 PM
3 minute read
International drug manufacturer AstraZeneca has been hit with a lawsuit alleging that a former sales representative in New York City was the victim of pregnancy discrimination when she was fired from her position in early 2018.
Mary Baselice claimed her more than seven-year record as a sales rep covering the Upper East Side of Manhattan was unblemished heading into 2018. According to the complaint she filed, she never received a performance rating below “effective” at any point, nor did she receive any disciplinary warnings or actions during her tenure with the company.
Baselice claimed the only thing that changed between her last review and her termination in February 2018 was the fact she informed her manager she was pregnant in January.
According to the complaint, Baselice's manager requested she attend a meeting less than a month after she alerted the company to her pregnancy. At the meeting, to her surprise, was her manager's manager and a member of the human resource team on speakerphone.
She was quizzed about elements of her business activity logs. Despite being “sandbagged with a last-minute meeting,” Baselice said in her complaint that she answered questions about delays to entries in her journal and why she didn't immediately answer phone calls from her direct manager on two occasions.
Despite providing what she considered reasonable and rational answers, she was notified within minutes of the meeting that she was terminated, effective immediately, due to “misconduct associated with the job.”
“Given Baselice's uniformly positive performance reviews, any such concerns were clearly a pretext manufactured for the purpose of justifying [AstraZeneca]'s intended and illegal pregnancy discrimination against Baselice,” the complaint states.
The complaint said the reasoning she was given at the time of her termination shifted in official documents, which said she was terminated based “solely on her consistent and repeated failure to follow company policy.”
At no point in her seven years of work with the company had she received any notice or warning about failing to adhere to company policies. In fact, only the opposite occurred, including the exclusively positive comments in her final review from Jan. 22, 2018.
“Consistent with a practice that is all too prevalent at large US companies, Baselice, an effective employee who received glowing performance reviews, was terminated from her job at [AstraZeneca] for the simple reason that she was pregnant,” the complaint states.
Baselice's lawsuit against the U.K.-based drug manufacturer asserted her rights under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978, as well as New York state and New York City human rights laws.
Allen & Desnoyers partner Denise D'Ambrosio represents Baselice in the suit. She did not respond to a request for comment.
A request for comment sent to representatives at AstraZeneca was not returned.
Related:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Final Countdown': SEC Launches Nearly 800% Litigation Surge in October
3 minute readCravath Elevates 7 to Partnership, Up From Last Year
NY District Attorneys Ask for Level Funding Amid Statewide Drop in Violent Crime
Trending Stories
- 1New York’s Equal Rights Amendment Is a Big Deal
- 2Blue-Ribbon Panel Calls for Pay Bumps for NYS Commissioners, But Says No to Lawmakers, Elected Officials
- 3'Outstanding Cooperation': Feds Seek Leniency in Sentencing for Ex-FTX Executive Gary Wang
- 4'Grave Matter of Serious Consequences': Why a Missouri Judge Sanctioned a Top Kirkland & Ellis Attorney
- 5Large Group Leaves DLA Piper Affiliate in Brazil to Form New Firm
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250