Cuomo, Lawmakers Agree Not to Defend Prosecutorial Watchdog's Constitutionality
Court papers obtained by the New York Law Journal show that Cuomo, Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins, Senate Republican Leader John Flanagan, and Assembly Republican Leader Brian Kolb have agreed not to defend the law in court and will halt its creation until the litigation is resolved.
June 02, 2019 at 02:22 PM
6 minute read
Nearly a year after state lawmakers in New York decided to create a special panel to review allegations of prosecutorial misconduct, Gov. Andrew Cuomo and all but one party leader in the Legislature have agreed to halt its creation pending the outcome of a lawsuit challenging its constitutionality.
Court papers obtained by the New York Law Journal show that Cuomo, Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins, Senate Republican Leader John Flanagan, and Assembly Republican Leader Brian Kolb have agreed not to defend the law in court and will halt the creation of a watchdog until the litigation is resolved.
The District Attorneys Association of the State of New York, which brought the lawsuit in October, has agreed to drop them from the litigation as part of a series of stipulations exchanged late last week.
Under the law created last year, and amended in January by the Legislature, each of those parties would have appointments to the so-called Commission on Prosecutorial Conduct. They've now agreed not to exercise that authority until the panel's constitutionality is decided by a judge, according to the documents.
Each stipulation is identical, minus the names of those parties. They're each represented by different private attorneys. The state Attorney General's Office declined to defend the law's constitutionality after the lawsuit was brought last year.
The documents say each lawmaker “is neither a necessary nor indispensable party to this lawsuit” and has agreed not to exercise his or her “authority under Article 15-A to appoint any commissioners to the CPC prior to the issuance of a final order or judgment by Supreme Court, Albany County, in this action.”
Albany County District Attorney David Soares, the current president of DAASNY who's also a plaintiff on the suit, said they felt “vindicated” by the agreements.
“We are pleased that these elected officials have wisely agreed not to move forward with this blatantly unconstitutional Commission while our lawsuit proceeds,” Soares said. “Our position on the unconstitutionality of the act creating the Commission was vindicated by their decision not to defend it.”
The only lawmaker that has agreed to stay in the lawsuit and defend the commission is Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie, a Bronx Democrat who is represented by Andrew Rossman, Kathleen Sullivan, and Alex Spiro, all partners at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan in Manhattan.
Representatives for Heastie could not immediately be reached for comment Sunday.
It's the latest development in what has been a nearly yearlong debate over the law's constitutionality.
Lawmakers first approved legislation last June to create the commission, but the bill was met with fierce criticism from the Attorney General's Office. Leslie Dubeck, previously counsel to former New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood, wrote in July that it would likely not survive judicial review as written.
Cuomo signed the legislation about a month later with a promise from lawmakers to approve an amendment at their next earliest opportunity that would cure the constitutional defects identified by Dubeck. That turned out to be January, on the same day as Cuomo's State of the State address.
The new version largely mirrored what lawmakers passed initially, but included a few tweaks to address Dubeck's analysis. More appointments were given to Cuomo than in the previous version, for example, to assuage concerns over the Legislature appointing the majority of a body designed to oversee the state's prosecutors, who are considered part of the executive branch.
But when Cuomo signed the amended version into the law in March, he conceded that constitutional flaws in the legislation were still apparent despite the round of changes.
“Previously unidentified infirmities — including constitutional separation of powers concerns with both the executive and judiciary — that leave this law vulnerable to legal attack have come into sharp focus with the passage of time and attention to the ongoing legal challenge,” Cuomo wrote. “Still, the Legislature remains unconvinced that changes recommended by the Executive are necessary and determined it best to deliver the bill unchanged.”
DAASNY has since filed a new version of its lawsuit that still identified several concerns over the law's constitutionality. It's argued, for example, that the commission could prevent district attorneys from pursuing difficult prosecutions out of concerns that their work would be scrutinize by a panel of appointees from multiple branches of state government.
Cuomo, Stewart-Cousins, Flanagan, and Kolb will no longer have to defend the constitutionality of the law, per the stipulation agreements. A spokesman for Flanagan declined to comment, citing the pending litigation.
Kolb, who didn't support either iteration of the commission, was dropped from the litigation by DAASNY without a stipulation agreement, his office said. He echoed the group's position in a statement Sunday.
“I voted against the original bill, and legislation to make modifications. The District Attorneys Association has raised serious concerns with the proposal and it appears the stipulation has done little to provide any reassurance,” Kolb said. “When you force public policy based solely on political motivations, the results are never positive. Creating this commission has always been a bridge too far.”
Representatives for the other lawmakers did not immediately comment on the development.
DAASNY is represented in the suit by Jim Walden and Jacob Gardener from Walden, Macht & Haran in Manhattan. They said they're looking forward to next steps in the litigation. Heastie is scheduled to file a response to the lawsuit this week.
“Now that we have finally identified the one party interested in contesting our constitutional arguments, we look forward to pressing those arguments in our upcoming motion for summary judgment,” Walden and Gardener said.
A watchdog panel, if the measure is upheld in court, would be composed of 11 members appointed by Cuomo, party leaders in the state Legislature, and Chief Judge Janet DiFiore. It would be tasked with reviewing complaints of misconduct against the state's prosecutors and imposing or recommending sanctions on those officials.
READ MORE:
NY State DAs Move to Block Creation of Prosecutorial Conduct Watchdog
Cuomo Approves Prosecutorial Conduct Watchdog, Despite Likely Constitutional Challenge
District Attorneys Urge Cuomo to Veto Prosecutorial Conduct Watchdog Bill
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit
4 minute readRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250