Cuomo Renews Push to Codify NY AG Role as Special Prosecutor in Police-Involved Deaths
Gov. Andrew Cuomo is making a last-minute push to permanently assign cases where someone dies following an encounter with a member of law enforcement to the state Attorney General's Office for an investigation, rather than a local district attorney.
June 03, 2019 at 05:45 PM
5 minute read
Gov. Andrew Cuomo is making a last-minute push to permanently assign cases where someone dies following an encounter with a member of law enforcement to the state Attorney General's Office for an investigation, rather than a local district attorney.
That's designed to prevent a conflict of interest that some have alleged could be presented by local prosecutors investigating members of law enforcement who they may know personally, or be more likely to give the benefit of the doubt.
The measure would codify an executive order from Cuomo four years ago that appointed the state Attorney General's Office as a special prosecutor when an unarmed civilian was killed by a member of law enforcement. Cuomo has since asked lawmakers to make that order permanent through legislative action and even included it in his executive budget proposal in January.
He argued Monday that if lawmakers don't approve a bill codifying the order, it would disappear when he leaves office. That would direct cases of police-involved deaths back to local prosecutors.
“We were supposed to pass a law that enshrined a special prosecutor for police misconduct. That has never happened,” Cuomo said. “I'm not going to continue to do this under executive order. I want a real office set up with real funding and real expertise.”
It's not something that Democrats in the Legislature have resisted, but this year was the first time since the executive order that they've had a real chance of codifying the idea into state law. Democrats took control of both houses of the Legislature this year for the first time in nearly a decade.
Republicans, who previously controlled the State Senate, had blocked the proposal from moving in recent years. It, conversely, passed in the Democrat-led Assembly last year, largely along party lines.
But, this year, it hasn't been approved by either chamber as of yet. State Sen. Jamaal Bailey, D-Bronx, said earlier this year that the version Cuomo proposed in his executive budget didn't go as far as they wanted when codifying the measure. Bailey sponsors legislation to permanently direct cases of police-involved deaths to the state Attorney General's Office.
His bill, which is sponsored by Assemblyman Nick Perry, D-Brooklyn, would go beyond Cuomo's executive order. Cuomo's version would only direct cases where a civilian is unarmed to the state Attorney General's Office for investigation and possible prosecution.
The proposal from Bailey and Perry would have the Attorney General's Office handle all cases where a civilian dies after an interaction with law enforcement, regardless of whether they were armed or not. It would also make certain grand jury proceedings more readily available to the public.
The legislation started to move in recent weeks after it was amended to its current version. It was approved by the Senate Codes Committee last week and was referred to another committee to be considered before it can come to the floor. The Assembly Codes Committee hasn't taken up the legislation since it was amended last month.
Bailey said the newly amended bill isn't a three-way agreement between the Legislature and the governor, but that he and Perry are pushing for the measure to pass both chambers by the end of session. They hadn't spoken to the governor or his staff about the bill as of last week.
“As of right now, we have the same-as bill and as session comes down we're looking for ways to continue to have this conversation and hopefully get this passed by the end of session,” Bailey said.
The District Attorneys Association of the State of New York, the group representing the state's prosecutors, hasn't taken a position on Cuomo's current proposal. But it was against the executive order when Cuomo first issued it in 2015. The group took issue with the notion, implied by the order, that prosecutors could not objectively investigate police-involved fatalities.
DAASNY did not immediately comment on Cuomo's renewed push to codify the executive order.
New York Attorney General Letitia James, meanwhile, has long been a supporter of the measure. She mentioned it repeatedly while campaigning for the position last year, and has maintained her position on the proposal since taking office.
James even put out her own proposal last year that would broaden the jurisdiction of her office over police-involved incidents. She called for her office to also have permanent jurisdiction over cases where civilians are injured during an interaction with law enforcement or when an officer is accused of sexual assault or a hate crime.
Representatives for James did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
READ MORE:
Proposal Would Codify NY AG Role as Special Prosecutor in Police-Involved Deaths
Cuomo, Lawmakers Announce Deal on State Budget, Criminal Justice Reforms
Cuomo, Lawmakers Agree Not to Defend Prosecutorial Watchdog's Constitutionality
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Didn't Notice Patient Wasn't Breathing': $13.7M Verdict Against Anesthesiologists
- 2'Astronomical' Interest Rates: $1B Settlement to Resolve Allegations of 'Predatory' Lending Cancels $534M in Small-Business Debts
- 3Senator Plans to Reintroduce Bill to Split 9th Circuit
- 4Law Firms Converge to Defend HIPAA Regulation
- 5Judge Denies Retrial Bid by Ex-U.S. Sen. Menendez Over Evidentiary Error
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250