Cuomo Renews Push to Codify NY AG Role as Special Prosecutor in Police-Involved Deaths
Gov. Andrew Cuomo is making a last-minute push to permanently assign cases where someone dies following an encounter with a member of law enforcement to the state Attorney General's Office for an investigation, rather than a local district attorney.
June 03, 2019 at 05:45 PM
5 minute read
Gov. Andrew Cuomo is making a last-minute push to permanently assign cases where someone dies following an encounter with a member of law enforcement to the state Attorney General's Office for an investigation, rather than a local district attorney.
That's designed to prevent a conflict of interest that some have alleged could be presented by local prosecutors investigating members of law enforcement who they may know personally, or be more likely to give the benefit of the doubt.
The measure would codify an executive order from Cuomo four years ago that appointed the state Attorney General's Office as a special prosecutor when an unarmed civilian was killed by a member of law enforcement. Cuomo has since asked lawmakers to make that order permanent through legislative action and even included it in his executive budget proposal in January.
He argued Monday that if lawmakers don't approve a bill codifying the order, it would disappear when he leaves office. That would direct cases of police-involved deaths back to local prosecutors.
“We were supposed to pass a law that enshrined a special prosecutor for police misconduct. That has never happened,” Cuomo said. “I'm not going to continue to do this under executive order. I want a real office set up with real funding and real expertise.”
It's not something that Democrats in the Legislature have resisted, but this year was the first time since the executive order that they've had a real chance of codifying the idea into state law. Democrats took control of both houses of the Legislature this year for the first time in nearly a decade.
Republicans, who previously controlled the State Senate, had blocked the proposal from moving in recent years. It, conversely, passed in the Democrat-led Assembly last year, largely along party lines.
But, this year, it hasn't been approved by either chamber as of yet. State Sen. Jamaal Bailey, D-Bronx, said earlier this year that the version Cuomo proposed in his executive budget didn't go as far as they wanted when codifying the measure. Bailey sponsors legislation to permanently direct cases of police-involved deaths to the state Attorney General's Office.
His bill, which is sponsored by Assemblyman Nick Perry, D-Brooklyn, would go beyond Cuomo's executive order. Cuomo's version would only direct cases where a civilian is unarmed to the state Attorney General's Office for investigation and possible prosecution.
The proposal from Bailey and Perry would have the Attorney General's Office handle all cases where a civilian dies after an interaction with law enforcement, regardless of whether they were armed or not. It would also make certain grand jury proceedings more readily available to the public.
The legislation started to move in recent weeks after it was amended to its current version. It was approved by the Senate Codes Committee last week and was referred to another committee to be considered before it can come to the floor. The Assembly Codes Committee hasn't taken up the legislation since it was amended last month.
Bailey said the newly amended bill isn't a three-way agreement between the Legislature and the governor, but that he and Perry are pushing for the measure to pass both chambers by the end of session. They hadn't spoken to the governor or his staff about the bill as of last week.
“As of right now, we have the same-as bill and as session comes down we're looking for ways to continue to have this conversation and hopefully get this passed by the end of session,” Bailey said.
The District Attorneys Association of the State of New York, the group representing the state's prosecutors, hasn't taken a position on Cuomo's current proposal. But it was against the executive order when Cuomo first issued it in 2015. The group took issue with the notion, implied by the order, that prosecutors could not objectively investigate police-involved fatalities.
DAASNY did not immediately comment on Cuomo's renewed push to codify the executive order.
New York Attorney General Letitia James, meanwhile, has long been a supporter of the measure. She mentioned it repeatedly while campaigning for the position last year, and has maintained her position on the proposal since taking office.
James even put out her own proposal last year that would broaden the jurisdiction of her office over police-involved incidents. She called for her office to also have permanent jurisdiction over cases where civilians are injured during an interaction with law enforcement or when an officer is accused of sexual assault or a hate crime.
Representatives for James did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCourt System Names New Administrative Judges for New York City Courts in Leadership Shakeup
3 minute readRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250