Western NY Town Justice Resigns After Publicly Criticizing Attorneys, Criminal Justice Laws
“Most of these individuals, if I had my way, you'd see them probably swinging outside the door, OK?” Stone said. “That's the way I was brought up.”
June 04, 2019 at 04:10 PM
3 minute read
A town justice in Wayne County, New York, has resigned after he was accused of making public statements criticizing the state's criminal justice system and implying that he ignored the presumption of innocence for defendants that appeared before him.
Scott Stone, who was a justice of Butler Town Court and Wolcott Village Court in western New York, was accused by the state Commission on Judicial Conduct of making those statements at a Wolcott Village Board meeting.
Public concerns regarding crime were discussed at the meeting, which was attended by Stone, the mayor and a handful of other local officials. Stone allegedly criticized the state's criminal justice system, including the role he played in it.
“To start with, the whole system, quite frankly, sucks,” Stone said, according to the commission.
He went as far in his statements as to show a lack of faith in those brought up on criminal charges, saying at one point that he thought they should “swing,” according to the complaint against him from the commission.
“Most of these individuals, if I had my way, you'd see them probably swinging outside the door, OK?” Stone said. “That's the way I was brought up.”
He made a handful of other statements as well, in which he criticized the state's laws on prosecuting minors, and even the work of lawyers to advocate for changes in the criminal procedure law.
“But thanks to lawyers, everybody has rights,” Stone said.
Stone, who is not an attorney, resigned from office at the end of last month as part of an agreement with the commission. He agreed not to seek judicial office again in the future.
Commission Administrator Robert Tembeckjian denounced Stone's comments in a statement Tuesday.
“On or off the bench, a judge must promote public confidence in the rule of law and the integrity of the judiciary,” Tembeckjian said. “Public remarks to the effect that the legal system 'sucks,' or that defendants should 'swing,' convey contempt for due process and evoke an ugly example of cruel injustice that has no place in modern society.”
Stone was represented before the commission by Douglas Jablonski, an attorney from Wolcott. Jablonski could not immediately be reached for comment Tuesday.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMayor's Advisory Committee To Hold Hearing on Fitness of Judicial Candidates
2 minute readMayor's Advisory Committee To Hold Hearing on Fitness of Judicial Candidates
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250