Barnes Says New Firm Run by Partner's Wife and Kids Infringes on Trademark
Stephen Barnes contends the family of his law firm partner is violating trademark laws in an effort to try to steal the business he worked hard to build.
June 10, 2019 at 01:18 PM
4 minute read
Ross Cellino Jr., left, and Stephen Barnes.
Stephen Barnes, one half of the dispute-racked New York personal injury powerhouse Cellino & Barnes, has sued a law firm run by the wife and daughters of his partner, Ross Cellino.
Claiming he was suing on behalf of his firm, Barnes accuses Cellino & Cellino of infringing on his law firm's trademarks, including its name and its phone number slogan “Don't Wait, Call 8!”
The new suit comes amid an effort by Cellino to dissolve Cellino & Barnes over disagreements with his partner Barnes, who insists that the business is robust, profitable and shouldn't be shut down.
In an April article in the Buffalo News, Jeanna Cellino, one of Ross Cellino's daughters and a founder of Cellino & Cellino, said her new firm would focus on personal injury law but said her father isn't involved in the new firm “in any way.” She said she was working with her mother Anna Marie and her sister Annmarie, and that they plan to hire one more lawyer.
Paul Cambria, a lawyer for Barnes, told The Buffalo News that there would be no issues in the dissolution dispute if Ross Cellino was truly not involved with the new firm.
But Barnes said in his new suit that website registration records and Ross Cellino's previous communications with attorneys at Cellino & Barnes strongly suggest Ross Cellino is involved in the new firm, and he wants the Cellino women to stop using the firm name.
“It is inevitable that actual confusion will arise if C&C is allowed to proceed with performing business under, marketing, and advertising its confusingly similar name,” the suit said.
As Barnes tells it, it has been clear since shortly after Ross Cellino filed for dissolution of their firm in 2017 that he had plans to start a similar business. Cellino pitched Cellino & Barnes' attorneys, in writing, on the prospect of joining a firm he referred to as “Cellino & ???” and even shot commercials for the new business in hopes of replicating the media omnipresence of the Cellino & Barnes brand in New York, Barnes' new suit alleges.
Between the new firm name and its phone number—716-888-2020, said by Barnes to be a mash-up of Cellino & Barnes' trademarked 800-888-8888 and its less catchy number, 716-854-2020—it's clear that Cellino & Cellino has set out to poach Cellino & Barnes' business in violation of the federal Lanham Act, Barnes alleges.
The complaint also said that the website cellinoandcellino.com was registered “by an unknown party” just a week before Ross Cellino sought to dissolve his firm. It was modified just two weeks before Cellino & Cellino filed incorporation papers, the suit contends.
The suit seeks a temporary restraining order, an injunction and damages.
Cellino & Cellino could not immediately be reached for comment.
Terry Connors, a partner at Connors LLP who represents Ross Cellino, said Barnes' suit was more proof that Cellino & Barnes should be dissolved. Cellino's dissolution case is set to go to trial in August, although an appeal from a summary judgment decision is pending.
“This lawsuit is the latest example of conclusive proof of the dissension and deadlock that requires dissolution of Cellino & Barnes,” Connors said in a statement. “Ross's co-owner has filed an unauthorized lawsuit on behalf of the firm—likely using firm funds—to prevent Ross's wife and daughters from starting their own law firm.”
Asked in an email if the suit was filed using firm funds, Barnes' lawyer, Gregory Photiadis of Duke, Holzman, Photiadis & Gresens, said no.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Judge Denies Retrial Bid by Ex-U.S. Sen. Menendez Over Evidentiary Error
What Businesses Need to Know About Anticipated FTC Leadership Changes
7 minute read
Trending Stories
- 1Trump Signs Executive Order Creating Strategic Bitcoin Reserve
- 2St. Jude Labs Sued for $14.3M for Allegedly Falling Short of Purchase Expectations
- 3'Ridiculously Busy': Several Law Firms Position Themselves as Go-To Experts on Trump’s Executive Orders
- 4States Reach New $7.4B Opioid Deal With Purdue After SCOTUS Ruling
- 5$975,000 Settlement Reached After Fall on Sidewalk
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
