Photo: BigstockFormer Partner Reaches Confidential Deal With Milberg in $15M Payment Dispute
The settlement appears to resolve a financial dispute between Milberg and one of its most high-profile former partners, although another former partner is still litigating against the firm.
June 11, 2019 at 06:37 PM
3 minute read
Steven G. Schulman, the disbarred lawyer who was once a partner at class action powerhouse Milberg, has reached a settlement in a $15 million suit he filed against the firm for falling behind on its scheduled payments to him.
In 2007, Schulman pleaded guilty to racketeering conspiracy. He was made to pay $2 million and served six months in prison after he was implicated in a scheme to pay named plaintiffs in class actions that also led to prison time for several of his partners.
In a suit Schulman filed earlier this year, he said the firm owed him $15 million for capital account and other withdrawal payments, noting he was the firm's biggest creditor.
In his suit against Milberg LLP and its operating successor, Milberg Tadler Phillips Grossman, Schulman said the payments suddenly dried up last year because of what he alleged was a scheme to shift Milberg's assets to Milberg Tadler amid the firm's 2018 reorganization.
According to a document filed June 7 in Manhattan Supreme Court, Schulman has agreed to withdraw his suit against both firms for now. The terms of the deal were not made public.
Whatever the terms are, they didn't result in Schulman indicating in a related case that his beef with the two Milberg firms is completely over. In a 2009 case in which he won a multimillion-dollar judgment against the firm, as of Tuesday, he had not filed papers indicating that the judgment was satisfied.
It also isn't clear whether Schulman's deal will affect others. David Bershad, another former Milberg partner implicated in the paid-plaintiffs scandal who also sued the firm this year for allegedly stopping agreed-to payments, appears to still be litigating against the firms and their partners Ariana Tadler, Glenn Phillips, Marc Grossman and Peggy Wedgworth as of Tuesday.
Bershad's lawyer, Samuel Portnoy of Gibbons, said in an April letter filed in court records that the parties were in settlement talks. He did not respond to a comment request.
“Glenn Phillips and Marc Grossman look forward to the continued success of their firm,” their lawyer Cliff Robert of Robert & Robert said in an email. Robert also represented the Milberg Tadler firm.
Leslie Corwin, Schulman's lawyer at Eisner, declined to comment. David Piedra of Morrison Cohen, who represents Milberg and partners Tadler and Wedgworth, didn't respond to a comment request.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Patent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
