Sidley and Willkie Find Refuge as Crash Keeps NY Offices Closed
The firms' Manhattan offices remained off-limits a day after a helicopter crash landing, with Willkie taking up temporary space in a client office and Sidley personnel working remotely.
June 11, 2019 at 05:50 PM
4 minute read
Lawyers at Willkie Farr & Gallagher and Sidley Austin were still forced to work outside their New York offices Tuesday afternoon, one day after a helicopter crash-landed on the roof of their building at 787 Seventh Ave.
Steven Gartner, Willkie's co-chairman, said that tenants still had not been told when they could return as of midafternoon on Tuesday. The building, which was evacuated immediately after the Monday afternoon crash, first has to be cleared for occupancy by authorities and building management, he said, noting an investigation by the National Transportation Safety Board.
In the meantime, some of Willkie's New York lawyers and staff were working in temporary space at a client's office on Tuesday, said Gartner, declining to name the client. Others in Willkie's 700-person New York office are working at home.
Willkie has made contingency plans in case the disruption continues, Gartner said, adding, “we'll be fine.”
There's been “no interruption” of Willkie's ability to work on client matters, he said. Firm lawyers have been on conference calls and have been attending meetings all day Tuesday, and “it's not going to interrupt our ability to serve our clients,” Gartner said.
Of course, there have been some inconveniences. For instance, some lawyers and staff left items in the building during the evacuation that they now need, such as a set of keys. But Willkie personnel can still retrieve items with a building escort, he said.
At Sidley, Samir Gandhi, managing partner of Sidley's New York office, said lawyers and staff were working at home or other locations Tuesday. He said he was hopeful the firm could return to the building as soon as Wednesday. The ultimate return date wasn't entirely certain, he said, as officials were still checking on the building's emergency power system, which may be difficult to access through the roof.
He said the firm had two main priorities after the building evacuation: looking after the well-being of its personnel after the building evacuation by making sure office workers got home safely, and making sure client matters were being serviced. The firm is following those priorities closely, he said.
Meanwhile, Sidley has received multiple generous offers from other law firms and the city bar for space and other resources, Gandhi said. So far, the firm hasn't taken up offers for temporary space, Gandhi said, adding, “We have truly appreciated the generosity that has been expressed to us.”
“We're able to work remotely, we've rescheduled things that are nonessential or moved essential things to other areas,” Gandhi said. “Our lawyers work around the world, they work on the weekend, they work unfortunately on vacation. They work all over the place. … Client demands are client demands, and the reality is that our lawyers are very, very capable of serving clients no matter what.”
When asked if he expected any big drop-off in billable work in the hours and days after the evacuation, he said he didn't expect that to happen.
“We're like all New Yorkers, we're extremely resilient and extremely strong,” he said. “We can get through this.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNeighboring States Have Either Passed or Proposed Climate Superfund Laws—Is Pennsylvania Next?
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 15th Circuit Considers Challenge to Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
- 2Crocs Accused of Padding Revenue With Channel-Stuffing HEYDUDE Shoes
- 3E-discovery Practitioners Are Racing to Adapt to Social Media’s Evolving Landscape
- 4The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 5FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250