State Senate Approves Legislation to End 'Gay Panic' Defense in NY
But lawmakers in the Senate may have to do so again in the coming days; the sponsor of the bill in the Assembly said staff from both chambers are working on what could be an amended version of the bill with different language.
June 11, 2019 at 06:01 PM
5 minute read
New York state lawmakers took another step Tuesday toward ending the so-called “gay panic” and “trans panic” defenses, which allow those facing murder charges to say their actions were driven by an extreme emotional disturbance incited by a victim's sexual orientation or gender identity.
The State Senate approved legislation that would bar individuals from using that defense, which has been sharply criticized by the New York State Bar Association and others within the legal community.
The bill was approved unanimously by members from both major parties, after the measure had been stalled in the Legislature since it was first introduced four years ago.
But lawmakers in the Senate may have to do so again in the coming days; the sponsor of the bill in the Assembly said staff from both chambers are working on what could be an amended version of the bill with different language.
“We are having ongoing negotiations about language, and I believe those negotiations are with the counsel in the Senate,” said Assemblyman Daniel O'Donnell, D-Manhattan. “They should be aware that changes might be coming. We're not going to pass it until negotiations are complete, but I'm hopeful we can get that done.”
The measure is sponsored in the State Senate by Sen. Brad Hoylman, D-Manhattan, who has carried the bill with O'Donnell since 2015. Hoylman said he's heard Democrats in the Assembly are willing to approve the measure, which is a change from last year when it failed to move in either chamber.
“We've heard good reports from the Codes Committee,” Hoylman said. “So, we're hopeful with us passing it today they'll simply join us and pass it as well.”
The bill wouldn't eliminate the option completely for a defendant to say they were influenced by and extreme emotional disturbance, but it would set limits on that defense.
The legislation, as it's written now, would modify the state penal law by saying that a nonviolent sexual advance, or the discovery of a person's sexual orientation or gender identity, could not be used to explain or excuse a defendant's action. The legislation would only apply in cases where an individual is charged with murder in the second degree, according to the bill.
Democrats in the Senate also approved a bill Tuesday that would allow women to act as paid surrogates for couple who can't physically have children on their own, including same-sex couples and those facing infertility. That measure passed mainly along party lines.
Both issues have been a last-minute priority for Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who named them among a list of priorities for lawmakers to address before they're scheduled to leave Albany for the year later this month. Cuomo called on lawmakers to give final passage to the measures in a press event Tuesday morning.
“There is no such thing as a celebration of one house passing a bill, because one house passing a bill means nothing,” Cuomo said. “It takes two to tango, it takes two to pass a bill.”
It's unclear when the Assembly is planning to consider either measure. O'Donnell said they're waiting until a final bill to eliminate the “gay panic” and “trans panic” defenses is negotiated by staff between both chambers.
The defenses are not commonly used, but Cuomo said the fact that defendants in New York even have the option is “disgusting.”
“It's so disgusting, is the only word,” Cuomo said. “It's unbelievable. It is incredible. It just cannot be allowed to exist, not just as a legal defense, but what it says about us and what it says about our values and what we believe, that we would allow that proposition to stand.”
Hank Greenberg, the newly minted president of the New York State Bar Association, was with Cuomo on Tuesday morning to support the legislation. He said having a law on the books that allows defendants to use such a defense goes against the value of equal justice with respect to members of the LGBTQ community.
“The 'gay panic defense' is based on the horrific, noxious concept that LGBTQ lives are worth less than others,” Greenberg said. “That concept is violative to our core values as people and the very antithesis to equal justice under the law.”
Cuomo has credited Hoylman and O'Donnell for bringing the issue to light in recent years. The legislation was partly inspired by the story of a transgender woman, Islan Nettles, who died in 2013 after she was struck by a man who discovered her gender identity.
Her assailant was sentenced to 12 years in prison after using the defense. He said at the time that, when Nettles revealed she was transgender, he became enraged and attacked her because of it. He later turned himself into the police and entered a guilty plea.
Lawmakers have less than two weeks to come to an agreement on the legislation before they're scheduled to leave Albany for the year June 19.
READ MORE:
Cuomo Blasts Democrats in NY Legislature Over Delay in Abolishing 'Gay Panic' Defense
Cuomo Plans New Push to End 'Gay Panic' Defense by End of Session
Cuomo Says Senate Votes Aren't There to Legalize Marijuana for Recreational Use in NY
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Departing Attorneys Sue Their Former Law Firm
- 2Pa. High Court: Concrete Proof Not Needed to Weigh Grounds for Preliminary Injunction Order
- 3'Something Else Is Coming': DOGE Established, but With Limited Scope
- 4Polsinelli Picks Up Corporate Health Care Partner From Greenberg Traurig in LA
- 5Kirkland Lands in Phila., but Rate Pressure May Limit the High-Flying Firm's Growth Prospects
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250