Cautious Democrats Urge Tougher Penalties for Black-Market Sales in Marijuana Legalization Bill, Sponsors Say
Democrats who were previously cautious about the legislation appeared to be closer to lending their support for the most recent version, Krueger said.
June 12, 2019 at 05:50 PM
5 minute read
Legislation to legalize marijuana for adult recreational use in New York doesn't have unanimous support in the State Senate partly because some Democrats in the chamber want tougher penalties for those convicted of selling large amounts of the drug on the black market.
After meeting behind closed doors with other Democrats to discuss a newly amended version of the legislation Wednesday, the bill's sponsor said a top concern was over the leniency of the measure.
“We limit criminal penalties so much that there are some concerns that there's not enough of a criminal penalty for larger, illegal distribution,” said state Sen. Liz Krueger, D-Manhattan, who sponsors the bill.
The discussion was not a preview for passage; they didn't count votes at the meeting, Krueger said. It was, instead, an opportunity for members to express what they'd like to see addressed in a future version of the bill.
Democrats who were previously cautious about the legislation appeared to be closer to lending their support for the most recent version, Krueger said.
The new version directs part of the revenue from the sale of legal marijuana to law enforcement agencies around the state for additional training and personnel. A major concern among some Democrats earlier this year was over the lack of training and resources for officers to detect when a driver is impaired by marijuana. The new bill appears to address that.
The bill would also direct the State Police to establish a pilot program for the testing and development of new technologies to detect drivers who are driving under the influence of the drug, according to the bill.
Testing done through that program, which would last a year, would not be allowed to be used by police to charge a driver with a crime, according to the bill. It would only be in place as a trial run for technologies to test whether a driver is impaired.
Lawmakers are also considering whether to create a lower-level charge for driving while impaired by marijuana, which currently doesn't exist in state law. That would allow defendants to face lesser charges for the crime, which often happens when someone is accused of drinking while driving.
But the proposed penalties for selling marijuana without a license from the state, and consequently outside regulations, remain too low for all Democrats to lend their support in the Senate, Krueger said.
Selling more than three ounces of marijuana without a license from the state would result in either a fine or a class A misdemeanor charge, for example. The latter penalty carries up to a year in jail if convicted.
Other crimes, like unlawfully selling marijuana prescribed for medical purposes or selling the drug to someone underage, would be class E felonies, according to the bill. Those carry a heavier sentence, which can be as long as four years in prison.
Many other concerns that were previously expressed by members over legalization, Krueger said, have been assuaged through educating lawmakers about the provisions of the bill, and the drug itself.
“I do feel we're making a lot of progress and I do feel like there's been enormous education among people about the mythology versus the facts,” Krueger said.
Democrats in the Assembly are planning to have a similar conversation, but hadn't as of Wednesday afternoon. Assembly Majority Leader Crystal Peoples-Stokes, D-Buffalo, has been lobbying members in the chamber to support the bill and has said in recent weeks that she's confident it will pass the Assembly before the end of session.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo has been pessimistic in recent weeks about the chances of legalizing the drug in New York this year. He's said he's not pushing hard on the issue, as he has with others, because the Senate had previously said they didn't have the votes for legalization.
Lawmakers, meanwhile, have said the path to legalization would be easier if Cuomo was more outspoken on the issue and became personally engaged with the Legislature's efforts to decriminalize the drug.
Progress appears to have been made in the past month, at least. A spokesman for Cuomo said last week that staff from his office and both chambers of the Legislature have talked about legalizing marijuana during recent three-way meetings, though lawmakers were not present for those discussions.
Opponents of legalizing marijuana have been active at the Capitol as well, as of late. They've argued that the measure would invite large companies to come into New York and dominate the market, rather than provide a boost to the state's regional economies. They also had the same concerns over traffic safety.
Lawmakers will have until next Wednesday to come to an agreement on legalizing marijuana if they want to do so this year. They're scheduled to leave Albany for the year after June 19.
READ MORE:
Lawmakers See Path to Marijuana Legalization Through Further Talks With Cuomo
Cuomo Says Senate Votes Aren't There to Legalize Marijuana for Recreational Use in NY
New Marijuana Legalization Bill Proposes Expungement of Records, Assembly Leader Says
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trump Administration Faces Legal Challenge Over EO Impacting Federal Workers
- 2Supreme Court Considers Reviving Lawsuit Over Fatal Traffic Stop Shooting
- 3Long Hours and Lack Of Boundaries: Associates In India Are Leaving Their Firms
- 4Goodwin Procter Relocates to Renewable-Powered Office in San Francisco’s Financial District
- 5'Didn't Notice Patient Wasn't Breathing': $13.7M Verdict Against Anesthesiologists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250