Lawmakers in New York Reach Deal to Make Permanent and Expand Protections of State's Rent Laws
The legislation would also create a new crime to be charged against landlords who unlawfully evict.
June 12, 2019 at 10:52 AM
4 minute read
A deal to make permanent and expand protections offered by the state's rent regulations in New York was announced overnight by lawmakers, who negotiated a two-way agreement on the issue without meeting with Gov. Andrew Cuomo.
Cuomo, who's pushed the Legislature in recent days to come to such an agreement, said Tuesday he would sign whatever bill lawmakers send to him.
Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins, D-Westchester, and Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie, D-Bronx, said in a joint statement late Tuesday evening that the new laws will be the strongest tenant protections in the state's history.
“For too long, power has been tilted in favor of landlords and these measures finally restore equity and extend protections to tenants across the state.” Heastie and Stewart-Cousins said in a joint statement. “These reforms will pass both legislative houses and we are hopeful that the governor will sign them into law. It is the right thing to do.”
Notably, the bill printed late Tuesday will make the state's rent laws permanent. They were previously approved to sunset every few years, which brought tenant groups and the real estate lobby back to Albany routinely to advocate for reform.
The legislation includes a number of other changes that lawmakers have said are intended to benefit tenants in New York City, particularly lower-income residents and those in rent-stabilized units.
The bill, for example, would eliminate a part of the state's current law that allows for units to be removed from rent stabilization when the cost of rent or the tenant's income passes certain thresholds. It would also repeal a section of law that currently allows landlords to increase the rent of a unit by as much as 20 percent when it becomes vacant.
Landlords would also have a tighter limit on how much they could increase the rent of a unit when major capital improvements, or MCIs, are made. New limits would be placed on what would quality as an MCI, which would be coupled with routine inspections to ensure that those rules are enforced.
The legislation also includes a number of other provisions designed to protect tenants from eviction and limit the power of landlords to increase rent by certain amounts.
Unlike the state's previous laws regarding rent stabilization, the new legislation would also allow municipalities statewide to opt in to those protections. Those municipalities would have to meet certain requirements, such as having less than 5% vacancy in the housing stock to be regulated, but would otherwise be able to adopt the regulations.
Other parts of the bill would automatically be enforced statewide to benefit tenants. Security deposits would be limited to one month's rent, for example, and new procedures would be put in place to ensure the deposit is returned to former tenants expeditiously.
The legislation would also create a new crime to be charged against landlords who unlawfully evict a tenant for reasons that run contrary to the state's laws. Landlords would be charged with the crime when they illegally lock out, or use force, to evict a tenant.
That crime would be a class A misdemeanor, which carries a maximum sentence of nearly a year in prison. Violators could also be forced to pay a civil penalty of between $1,000 and $10,000 per instance, according to the bill.
Lawmakers are expected to approve the bill later this week. The rent laws are due to expire on June 15, which put them in a time crunch this month before the end of this year's legislative session, which is scheduled to conclude next Wednesday.
READ MORE:
State Senate Approves Legislation to End 'Gay Panic' Defense in NY
Bill Codifying NY AG Role in Police-Involved Deaths Scheduled for Key Committee Vote
Bill Regulating NY Title Insurance Industry Set to Pass Legislature Next Week
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Greenberg Traurig Combines Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate Groups, Anticipating Uptick in Demand
- 2Trump Administration Faces Legal Challenge Over EO Impacting Federal Workers
- 3Supreme Court Considers Reviving Lawsuit Over Fatal Traffic Stop Shooting
- 4Long Hours and Lack Of Boundaries: Associates In India Are Leaving Their Firms
- 5Goodwin Procter Relocates to Renewable-Powered Office in San Francisco’s Financial District
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250