Sponsor of Prosecutorial Conduct Watchdog Bill Urges Cuomo, Lawmakers to Rejoin Lawsuit
“I'm calling on the governor, my colleagues in the Senate, to get back on board,” Perry said.
June 14, 2019 at 06:13 PM
5 minute read
The lead sponsor of legislation to create a special commission tasked with reviewing complaints of misconduct against the state's prosecutors called on Gov. Andrew Cuomo and lawmakers Friday to reverse a court-approved stipulation and begin appointments to the panel.
Assemblyman Nick Perry, D-Brooklyn, said during a press conference Friday that Cuomo and leaders in the state Legislature should break an agreement in the litigation that prevents them from appointing members as long as they don't defend the law in court.
“I'm calling on the governor, my colleagues in the Senate, to get back on board,” Perry said. “You are supposed to be a part of defending this law and it's wrong to step aside and allow the District Attorneys Association to run amok with the rights of the people. It's horrifying.”
Cuomo and both party leaders in the State Senate entered into a stipulation earlier this month in which they agreed to forgo defending the statute as long as they were no longer involved in the lawsuit against it. In return, they agreed not to make any appointments to the commission.
That agreement was part of a lawsuit against the Commission on Prosecutorial Conduct from the District Attorneys Association of the State of New York, which has alleged that the statute establishing the panel is unconstitutional. DAASNY declined to comment on Perry's call.
The lone defendant left on the lawsuit is Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie, D-Bronx. Heastie could make an appointment to the commission at any time, but it wouldn't matter. The commission would need a quorum of members to become operational. That likely won't happen until the litigation is resolved.
Perry urged Cuomo and leaders in the Legislature to walk back their agreement not to defend the law, and instead rejoin Heastie's efforts in the lawsuit. He said that, even if the law is ultimately ruled unconstitutional, it's still their duty to go to bat for it.
“The courts will uphold it and even if that didn't happen, our job as elected representatives of the people is to defend the right of the people to a criminal justice system that provides accountability to prosecutors who hold among the most powerful office in the land,” Perry said.
Perry has been a longtime sponsor of the measure, and carried it in the Assembly when it was first approved by the Legislature last year. That's when things got complicated.
Counsel for former New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood wrote to Cuomo's office at the time that the legislation, as it was written, likely wouldn't survive judicial review. Cuomo signed it with a promise from lawmakers to pass an amended version at their next earliest opportunity.
The Legislature then passed a new version of the bill in January. It was intended to cure the constitutional defects identified by the Attorney General's Office, but not all were addressed in the amended version. Cuomo said as much when he signed it in March.
“Previously unidentified infirmities — including constitutional separation of powers concerns with both the executive and judiciary — that leave this law vulnerable to legal attack have come into sharp focus with the passage of time and attention to the ongoing legal challenge,” Cuomo wrote. “Still, the Legislature remains unconvinced that changes recommended by the Executive are necessary and determined it best to deliver the bill unchanged.”
Perry commended Cuomo for approving the bill both times, and urged him to follow through on that signature with a strong defense of the statute. Cuomo is represented in the lawsuit by Jim McGuire and Daniel Sullivan, partners at Holwell Shuster & Goldberg in Manhattan. The Attorney General's Office has declined to defend the law.
“It was a good decision when the governor signed the bill,” Perry said. “I think it's a bad decision to not be a part of defending this law. It's a bad decision to leave the ship when it's sailing into a clear harbor.”
The litigation was dropped against Senate Democratic Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins and Senate Republican Leader John Flanagan as part of the stipulation agreements. Assembly Republican Leader Brian Kolb, who never supported the legislation, was let out of the commission without a stipulation.
If the measure is upheld in court, the panel would be composed of 11 members appointed by Cuomo, party leaders in the state Legislature, and Chief Judge Janet DiFiore. It would be tasked with reviewing complaints of misconduct against the state's prosecutors and imposing or recommending sanctions on those officials.
DAASNY is represented in the suit by Jim Walden and Jacob Gardener from Walden, Macht & Haran in Manhattan.
READ MORE:
Cuomo, Lawmakers Agree Not to Defend Prosecutorial Watchdog's Constitutionality
NY State DAs Move to Block Creation of Prosecutorial Conduct Watchdog
Cuomo Approves Prosecutorial Conduct Watchdog, Despite Likely Constitutional Challenge
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Critical Mass With Law.com’s Amanda Bronstad: LA Judge Orders Edison to Preserve Wildfire Evidence, Is Kline & Specter Fight With Thomas Bosworth Finally Over?
- 2What Businesses Need to Know About Anticipated FTC Leadership Changes
- 3Federal Court Considers Blurry Lines Between Artist's Consultant and Business Manager
- 4US Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
- 5White & Case KOs Claims Against Voltage Inc. in Solar Companies' Trade Dispute
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250