Deal Is Reached to End 'Gay Panic' Defense in NY, Cuomo Says
Cuomo said during a radio interview Monday morning that the new legislation is an agreement between his office and the Legislature, which is expected to approve the bill in the coming days.
June 17, 2019 at 02:19 PM
6 minute read
After years of stalling before lawmakers in New York, legislation to end the so-called “gay panic” and “trans panic “ defenses appears poised to pass this week after Gov. Andrew Cuomo said Monday he had struck a deal on the issue with the state Legislature.
Lawmakers, over the weekend, introduced a new version of the bill that would eliminate those defenses, which currently allow those facing murder charges to say their actions were driven by an extreme emotional disturbance incited by a victim's sexual orientation or gender identity.
Cuomo said during a radio interview Monday morning that the new legislation is an agreement between his office and the Legislature, which is expected to approve the bill in the coming days. The Cuomo administration later confirmed the deal as being between the governor's office and both houses of the Legislature.
“I believe we have an agreement ending the 'gay panic' defense, which was codifying homophobia,” Cuomo said.
The legislation is sponsored by state Sen. Brad Hoylman, D-Manhattan, and Assemblyman Daniel O'Donnell, D-Manhattan, each of whom are openly gay members of the Legislature. They've pushed the bill for the last several years.
O'Donnell, who is a former public defender, said he has been met with criticism by criminal defense attorneys for sponsoring the legislation, but decided to set aside those concerns to negotiate a final bill.
“Although I'm getting a lot of pushback from the criminal defense community I come out of, the truth is being gay or trans is not a deathworthy offense,” O'Donnell said. “I know the area of law very well. I've studied it, and the truth is someone shouldn't be able to claim they killed someone because they're trans.”
Defender organizations in New York City recently signed on to a memo opposing the measure. They argued the legislation would result in more people spending time in prison and for longer periods of time, rather than benefit members of the LGBTQ community. The Legal Aid Society, Bronx Defenders, Brooklyn Defender Services, New York State Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and others were on the memo.
“Increased dependence on criminalization and incarceration, and on the tools of the state used to lock more people in cages, will not bring an end to discrimination and violence against LGBTQ+ people,” the groups wrote. “By eliminating this defense, we will be providing the state with yet another tool to incarcerate more people.”
The bill wouldn't eliminate the option completely for defendants to say they were influenced by an extreme emotional disturbance, but it would set limits on that defense.
Defendants facing murder charges would no longer be able to plead them down to manslaughter by saying their actions were driven by the discovery of a victim's sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, gender expression or sex assigned at birth, according to the text of the bill.
“It makes an important statement that victims, in this case LGBTQ ones, are not to be blamed for these types of heinous crimes,” Hoylman said. “It's a fitting and important message to the LGBTQ community during this 50th anniversary of Stonewall.”
O'Donnell made the same point about the significance of the bill likely becoming law five decades after the riots at the Stonewall Inn in New York City.
“Our state should send a message loud and clear 50 years after Stonewall, which was a riot started by trans women of color, who were not going to tolerate someone claiming that their gender identity or expression or their sexuality allowed someone to be murdered,” O'Donnell said.
Lawmakers have to wait three days since the bill was introduced Saturday to approve it in both chambers. That delay is required under state law. But once it's approved and signed by Cuomo, the measure would take effect immediately.
The legislation hadn't received much attention this year until Cuomo included it on a list of his top priorities for lawmakers to address before the end of this year's legislative session. Since then, he's held a handful of public events pushing lawmakers to approve the bill, which had stalled in the Legislature in the last several years.
That changed last week when the State Senate decided to unanimously approve a version of the bill different from the three-way agreement announced by Cuomo on Monday. They'll now have to take up the new version of the bill, which is expected to pass without opposition in the chamber. The Assembly, which hasn't voted on any version of the measure, is expected to approve it as well.
Cuomo has credited Hoylman and O'Donnell for bringing the issue to light in recent years. The legislation was partly inspired by the story of a transgender woman, Islan Nettles, who died in 2013 after she was struck by a man who discovered her gender identity.
Her assailant was sentenced to 12 years in prison after using the defense. He said at the time that, when Nettles revealed she was transgender, he became enraged and attacked her because of it. He later turned himself into the police and entered a guilty plea.
It's also supported by the New York State Bar Association. NYSBA President Hank Greenberg rallied with Cuomo last week to support the measure.
“The 'gay panic defense' is based on the horrific, noxious concept that LGBTQ lives are worth less than others,” Greenberg said. “That concept is violative to our core values as people and the very antithesis to equal justice under the law.”
Lawmakers could vote on the bill as early as Tuesday before they're scheduled to leave Albany for the year later this week.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Philadelphia Bar Association Executive Director Announces Retirement
- 2SEC Chair Gary Gensler to Resign on Trump's Inauguration Day
- 3How I Made Partner: 'Develop a Practice Area You Really Care About,' Says Jennifer A. Gniady of Stradley Ronon
- 4Indian Billionaire Gautam Adani Indicted in Brooklyn for Alleged Orchestration of $250 Million Bribery Plot
- 5St. Ivo: Patron Saint of Lawyers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250