Deal Is Reached to End 'Gay Panic' Defense in NY, Cuomo Says
Cuomo said during a radio interview Monday morning that the new legislation is an agreement between his office and the Legislature, which is expected to approve the bill in the coming days.
June 17, 2019 at 02:19 PM
6 minute read
After years of stalling before lawmakers in New York, legislation to end the so-called “gay panic” and “trans panic “ defenses appears poised to pass this week after Gov. Andrew Cuomo said Monday he had struck a deal on the issue with the state Legislature.
Lawmakers, over the weekend, introduced a new version of the bill that would eliminate those defenses, which currently allow those facing murder charges to say their actions were driven by an extreme emotional disturbance incited by a victim's sexual orientation or gender identity.
Cuomo said during a radio interview Monday morning that the new legislation is an agreement between his office and the Legislature, which is expected to approve the bill in the coming days. The Cuomo administration later confirmed the deal as being between the governor's office and both houses of the Legislature.
“I believe we have an agreement ending the 'gay panic' defense, which was codifying homophobia,” Cuomo said.
The legislation is sponsored by state Sen. Brad Hoylman, D-Manhattan, and Assemblyman Daniel O'Donnell, D-Manhattan, each of whom are openly gay members of the Legislature. They've pushed the bill for the last several years.
O'Donnell, who is a former public defender, said he has been met with criticism by criminal defense attorneys for sponsoring the legislation, but decided to set aside those concerns to negotiate a final bill.
“Although I'm getting a lot of pushback from the criminal defense community I come out of, the truth is being gay or trans is not a deathworthy offense,” O'Donnell said. “I know the area of law very well. I've studied it, and the truth is someone shouldn't be able to claim they killed someone because they're trans.”
Defender organizations in New York City recently signed on to a memo opposing the measure. They argued the legislation would result in more people spending time in prison and for longer periods of time, rather than benefit members of the LGBTQ community. The Legal Aid Society, Bronx Defenders, Brooklyn Defender Services, New York State Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and others were on the memo.
“Increased dependence on criminalization and incarceration, and on the tools of the state used to lock more people in cages, will not bring an end to discrimination and violence against LGBTQ+ people,” the groups wrote. “By eliminating this defense, we will be providing the state with yet another tool to incarcerate more people.”
The bill wouldn't eliminate the option completely for defendants to say they were influenced by an extreme emotional disturbance, but it would set limits on that defense.
Defendants facing murder charges would no longer be able to plead them down to manslaughter by saying their actions were driven by the discovery of a victim's sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, gender expression or sex assigned at birth, according to the text of the bill.
“It makes an important statement that victims, in this case LGBTQ ones, are not to be blamed for these types of heinous crimes,” Hoylman said. “It's a fitting and important message to the LGBTQ community during this 50th anniversary of Stonewall.”
O'Donnell made the same point about the significance of the bill likely becoming law five decades after the riots at the Stonewall Inn in New York City.
“Our state should send a message loud and clear 50 years after Stonewall, which was a riot started by trans women of color, who were not going to tolerate someone claiming that their gender identity or expression or their sexuality allowed someone to be murdered,” O'Donnell said.
Lawmakers have to wait three days since the bill was introduced Saturday to approve it in both chambers. That delay is required under state law. But once it's approved and signed by Cuomo, the measure would take effect immediately.
The legislation hadn't received much attention this year until Cuomo included it on a list of his top priorities for lawmakers to address before the end of this year's legislative session. Since then, he's held a handful of public events pushing lawmakers to approve the bill, which had stalled in the Legislature in the last several years.
That changed last week when the State Senate decided to unanimously approve a version of the bill different from the three-way agreement announced by Cuomo on Monday. They'll now have to take up the new version of the bill, which is expected to pass without opposition in the chamber. The Assembly, which hasn't voted on any version of the measure, is expected to approve it as well.
Cuomo has credited Hoylman and O'Donnell for bringing the issue to light in recent years. The legislation was partly inspired by the story of a transgender woman, Islan Nettles, who died in 2013 after she was struck by a man who discovered her gender identity.
Her assailant was sentenced to 12 years in prison after using the defense. He said at the time that, when Nettles revealed she was transgender, he became enraged and attacked her because of it. He later turned himself into the police and entered a guilty plea.
It's also supported by the New York State Bar Association. NYSBA President Hank Greenberg rallied with Cuomo last week to support the measure.
“The 'gay panic defense' is based on the horrific, noxious concept that LGBTQ lives are worth less than others,” Greenberg said. “That concept is violative to our core values as people and the very antithesis to equal justice under the law.”
Lawmakers could vote on the bill as early as Tuesday before they're scheduled to leave Albany for the year later this week.
READ MORE:
State Senate Approves Legislation to End 'Gay Panic' Defense in NY
Cuomo Blasts Democrats in NY Legislature Over Delay in Abolishing 'Gay Panic' Defense
Cuomo Plans New Push to End 'Gay Panic' Defense by End of Session
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit
4 minute readRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
Trending Stories
- 1Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 2Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
- 3Jackson Lewis Leaders Discuss Firm's Innovation Efforts, From Prompt-a-Thons to Gen AI Pilots
- 4Trump's DOJ Files Lawsuit Seeking to Block $14B Tech Merger
- 5'No Retributive Actions,' Kash Patel Pledges if Confirmed to FBI
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250