Progressive Attorney Pivots to Full-Time Role at Kaplan Hecker & Fink
After splitting his time between two law firms, a teaching gig and a multifront war against the Trump administration, Joshua Matz has taken a counsel role at Roberta Kaplan's firm.
June 17, 2019 at 03:28 PM
4 minute read
A progressive, young lawyer and former Supreme Court clerk known for his appellate advocacy and for being one of the leading lights in the legal campaign against the Trump administration has taken a full-time role at Kaplan Hecker & Fink.
Joshua Matz split his time until last month between the Kaplan firm and Gupta Wessler, another prominent progressive law firm known for representing consumers in appellate litigation. He praised his former colleagues but said Kaplan Hecker, where he is counsel, is a bigger firm with the resources to both cater to businesses and to take on cases with major social impact.
“I reached the point where it made sense for me to have a home base,” Matz said.
Matz, who clerked for Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy and the Ninth Circuit's “liberal lion” Stephen Reinhardt, said he anticipated his practice would grow from being focused on the U.S. Supreme Court and other federal appellate courts to include trial-level proceedings and other courts where important legal fights are fought.
He said he appreciated that Kaplan Hecker didn't just take on pro bono mainstays like tenant defense, prisoner suits and challenges to removal orders, but also litigates cases that could have a “massive impact.” Those include challenges to President Donald Trump's official actions and his businesses, and a suit filed by Charlottesville, Virginia, residents who sued a host of racist groups and people allegedly responsible for the protests and acts of violence that shook the city in 2017.
“The firm has this unbelievable model of major high-stakes work” with a social or political angle, but also has “incredibly cool cutting-edge commercial clients” who are “trying to navigate a shifting regulatory landscape,” Matz said. His online biography lists Airbnb and Petal Card Inc. among his clients.
Matz, 34, has some history with Roberta Kaplan, the former Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison lawyer who started her own firm, initially called Kaplan & Co. LLP, in 2017. He joined the firm later that year in what he described as an of-counsel capacity that was less of a full-time commitment than his new role; legal blogger-turned-recruiter David Lat wrote that he was “one of the leading legal minds of his generation” who had a “Rain Man-esque” ability to recall the holdings of obscure Supreme Court decisions.
In his new role, Matz will keep publishing “Take Care,” a legal blog that analyzes and critiques Trump and his administration, and will keep teaching a course titled “Constitutional Litigation and the Current Administration” alongside Amir Ali at the Georgetown University Law Center. He said he anticipates splitting his time between D.C., where he and his husband have a home, and New York, where his new firm's offices are.
Many law firms have an “extraordinarily cautious, almost bunker mentality about doing anything outside the confines of a case,” Matz said. At Kaplan Hecker, he said, that isn't the case; lawyers there can speak and write essays, blog posts and books (Matz has co-authored two with Harvard professor Laurence Tribe) that touch on the cases and causes they devote themselves to, he said.
Recently, Kaplan—who represented Edith Windsor in her landmark case against the United States that found the Defense of Marriage Act's definition of marriage as between a man and a woman to be unconstitutional—has even registered as a lobbyist in New York state to push for legislation on behalf of Time's Up, an anti-sexual harassment movement she has backed.
Kaplan said her efforts in Albany were focused on extending the five-year statute of limitations for second- and third-degree rape, a proposal that Gov. Andrew Cuomo has supported. She said Matz's broad remit dovetails with her firm's efforts to “reinvigorate the sense of lawyers as public citizens” who act through more than their cases.
No one at Gupta Wessler immediately responded to a comment request Monday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAttorneys 'On the Move': Structured Finance Attorney Joins Hunton Andrews Kurth; Foley Adds IP Partner
4 minute readNY Civil Liberties Legal Director Stepping Down After Lengthy Tenure
Former Top Aide to NYC Mayor Is Charged With Bribery Conspiracy
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250