AG James Backs Data Breach Protection Act Passed by Legislature
The act would apply the state's data-breach notification requirement to any person or entity with a state resident's private information, instead of applying it only to those conducting business in the state. The bill now moves to Gov. Cuomo's desk.
June 19, 2019 at 11:48 AM
3 minute read
State lawmakers have passed legislation that would “modernize” and update consumer data protections and expand New York Attorney General Letitia James' oversight of data breaches affecting New Yorkers, according to a news release issued by James “applauding” the act's passage.
Called the “Stop Hacks and Improve Electronic Data Security Act,” or SHIELD Act, the bill now moves to Gov. Andrew Cuomo's desk for his decision on whether to sign it into law.
The legislation, first introduced by the Attorney General's Office in 2017 after the Equifax Inc. data breach compromised some 145.5 million Americans' personal information, includes a number of measures aimed at enhancing protections for New Yorkers, including applying the state's data breach notification requirement to any person or entity with a state resident's private information, instead of applying it only to those conducting business in the state, James' office said.
In addition, the act broadens the definition of a data breach to include unauthorized persons who gain access to private information, rather than using the current “acquired standard,” the news release said. The legislation also expands the scope of information subject to the state's notification law to include biometric information, email addresses and corresponding passwords, or security questions and answers.
“[M]y office has been working hard this session to modernize our outdated laws governing data breaches,” James said in the news release. “This bill is an important step forward providing greater protection for consumer's private information and holding companies accountable for securing that data.”
The news release noted that under current law, entities that collect private information must give notice to the Attorney General's Office when there is a data breach, as the office is the lone enforcer of the state's data breach law found in General Business Law 899-aa.
James' office then said that “given the evolution of how individuals use and disseminate private information, the Office of the Attorney General submitted the SHIELD Act as an agency program bill in order to update the current statute to keep pace.”
The act was first introduced under former Attorney General Eric Schneiderman following the massive Equifax breach, which reportedly compromised the personal information of more than 8 million New Yorkers.
James' office further noted that if the legislation is made into law, New York would join an “increasing number of states that require reasonable data security protections, while being careful to avoid excessive costs to small business and without imposing duplicate obligations under federal or state data security regulations.”
The act's data security requirements are “tailored to the size of a business,” the release said.
“The SHIELD Act will put strong safeguards in place to curb data breaches and identity theft,” said Justin Brookman, director of privacy and technology policy for Consumer Reports, in James' news release.
He added, “This is a big win in the fight to improve data security for the people of New York, and it helps build momentum for reforms nationwide.”
The legislative sponsors for the bill were state Sen. Kevin Thomas and Assemblymen Michael DenDekker, the news release said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEuropean, US Litigation Funding Experts Look for Commonalities at NYU Event
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250