In Wake of Marijuana Legalization Bill Failure, NY Lawmakers Eye Decriminalization
The measure would replace criminal charges for small amounts of marijuana with violations and allow low-level convictions to be expunged.
June 19, 2019 at 03:01 PM
4 minute read
Gov. Andrew Cuomo is pushing state lawmakers in New York to approve a measure aimed at decriminalizing marijuana, after Democrats announced Wednesday morning they could not come to an agreement on legalizing the drug for adult, recreational use.
Lawmakers, as of Wednesday afternoon, had not committed to passing the measure, which would replace criminal charges for small amounts of marijuana with violations and allow low-level convictions to be expunged.
Cuomo, in a statement, urged lawmakers to approve the legislation before they leave Albany for the year. They're scheduled to end this year's session Wednesday, but that's likely to drag into Thursday morning.
“Communities of color have been disproportionately impacted by laws governing marijuana for far too long and it has to end,” Cuomo said. “I understand the desire to end session today as planned, and will give the legislature a message of necessity to expedite passage if required.”
A message of necessity is something Cuomo hands down to the Legislature when a bill hasn't aged long enough to be considered by lawmakers. Legislation has to wait three days before it's approved in New York.
But lawmakers weren't sure, as of early Wednesday afternoon, whether they were going to take the measure up in the State Senate. State Sen. Liz Krueger, D-Manhattan, who sponsored the legalization bill, said there were concerns from advocates that it didn't go far enough to eliminate penalties for marijuana-related offenses.
“We still haven't conference what we're doing,” Krueger said. “I think the decrim bill is under consideration in a variety of different directions.”
Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie, D-Bronx, said he expected his chamber to take the measure up, assuming there was no lasting hope of legalizing the drug. Krueger had said in a statement Wednesday morning that the full bill to tax and regulate marijuana sales in New York didn't have enough support to pass.
“If nothing happens, I would think that we would still look to do decriminalization at the very least,” Heastie said.
As of Wednesday, concerns still remained on certain public safety aspects of legalizing marijuana. There's currently no mainstream way to quickly test someone's intoxication for the drug, for example, so charging someone with a driving offense could be complicated if an officer doesn't have the right training.
Lawmakers have also been split about where the revenue from marijuana sales should go. Many have pushed for the money to be redirected to communities that were particularly impacted by the state's drug laws.
Attention turned Wednesday morning to the decriminalization legislation sponsored by State Sen. Jamaal Bailey, D-Bronx. He said they haven't fully discussed the bill, but that it could still come to the floor for a vote before the day is over.
“It's quite possible,” Bailey said. “It's the last day of session, and anything is possible.”
The bill would make possession of small amounts of marijuana punishable by small fines and would classify them as violations rather than crimes. The fine for possessing small amounts would be capped at $50, according to the bill. The fine for possessing more than an ounce of marijuana-related substances would not exceed $200.
The legislation would also allow automatic expungement of low-level marijuana convictions, such as possessing small amounts of marijuana. New York Attorney General Letitia James recently wrote to lawmakers urging them to include the provision in any final marijuana bill they pass this session.
Lawmakers said Wednesday that it's likely that this year's legislative session will end early Thursday morning, or sometime later Thursday. Either way, they're prepared to be in session overnight to continue moving legislation.
READ MORE:
Marijuana Legalization Dead for Now in NY, Sponsor Says, But Decriminalization Still on Table
Lawmakers See Path to Marijuana Legalization Through Further Talks With Cuomo
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1‘Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission’: Another Consequence of 'Hobby Lobby'?
- 2With DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
- 3In-House Legal Network The L Suite Acquires Legal E-Learning Platform Luminate+
- 4In Police Shooting Case, Kavanaugh Bleeds Blue and Jackson ‘Very Very Confused’
- 5Trump RTO Mandates Won’t Disrupt Big Law Policies—But Client Expectations Might
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250