Sexual Harassment Laws to Change in NY Under Bill Passed by Legislature
"We don't yet have the strongest laws in the nation, but we're a lot closer, and we'll continue to work until we do," advocates said.
June 19, 2019 at 09:10 PM
6 minute read
State lawmakers in New York crossed party lines Wednesday evening to approve a sweeping new set of reforms to the state's laws on sexual harassment designed to offer new protections for victims, both in the workplace and when they report inappropriate behavior.
Legislation to do so passed unanimously in the State Senate late Wednesday, and with little opposition in the Assembly. It has support from Gov. Andrew Cuomo.
The issue was the subject of two joint legislative hearings this year, inspired by a group of former legislative staffers who have said they were victims of sexual harassment while working in state government.
The Sexual Harassment Working Group, as it's called, hailed the legislation Wednesday evening but said it'll continue to push for additional reforms. Lawmakers have said they intend to do the same.
“Together, we pushed for public hearings, and today's bill is the result of centering survivors' voices to craft meaningful legislation that will truly protect workers,” the group said. “We don't yet have the strongest laws in the nation, but we're a lot closer, and we'll continue to work until we do.”
The legislation was sponsored by Assemblywoman Aravella Simotas, D-Queens, and State Sen. Alessandra Biaggi, D-Westchester. Both lawmakers have, in recent weeks, worked to negotiate the final legislation as a three-way agreement with Cuomo, who plans to sign the bills when they're sent to his desk.
“With this legislation, employers across all sectors will be held accountable for addressing all forms of sexual harassment and discrimination in the workplace and survivors will be given the necessary time to report complaints and seek the justice they deserve,” Biaggi said.
She and Simotas led both hearings earlier this year to hear hours of testimony from victims of sexual harassment, employment attorneys, and others on how the state's laws can be improved. The legislation passed Wednesday is the culmination of those efforts.
“These comprehensive reforms will empower workers and make it easier to hold bad actors accountable,” Simotas said. “With the passage of this bill, New York will take a meaningful step forward in preventing workplace harassment and transforming the culture that enables abusers to thrive.”
The measure is an omnibus bill of different changes to the state's sexual harassment laws, many of which were included in previous versions of the legislation introduced earlier this year.
It would lower the standard at which victims of sexual harassment can bring claims either in court or through an administrative agency. That behavior, to merit action, is currently required to be “severe or pervasive,” a standard that advocates have said can sometimes be hard to meet.
A harasser may be let off the hook, for example, because his or her behavior isn't considered severe or pervasive enough to constitute a valid claim, regardless of how it's impacted the victim.
“This bill is a revolutionary bill for workers,” said Rita Pasarell, a member of the Sexual Harassment Working Group. “Changing the severe or pervasive standard completely overhauls the power workers have, and the bill does more than that.”
The legislation would also eliminate part of what's called the Faragher-Ellerth defense, which is commonly used by employers to dismiss claims of sexual harassment.
The defense was created from two different U.S. Supreme Court decisions. Those rulings found an employer is not liable for sexual harassment if it can show the employee didn't follow the employer's policy for addressing inappropriate behavior, take the directed steps during an investigation or comply with other standards established by that procedure.
The bill approved by lawmakers Wednesday would remove the Faragher-Ellerth defense as an affirmative defense for employers, meaning that it wouldn't be as powerful against claims of sexual harassment.
“It's an attack on Faragher-Ellerth, not an elimination on Faragher-Ellerth,” Pasarell said. “What the text of the bill says is it's not determinative for an employer's liability if the worker doesn't report. Which means they can use it, but it's not determinative. Before, when it was an affirmative defense, it was determinative.”
There are several other significant changes in the bill. Victims of sexual harassment will have three years to report claims to the state Division of Human Rights, rather than the one year that they have now. That's the same amount of time they would have to bring a claim in court.
The bill would also expand the power of the state Attorney General's Office to prosecute cases of discrimination based on all protected classes. It would also mandate that the state Department of Labor and DHR update the state's model sexual harassment policy regularly and study how further progress could be made on the issue.
Nondisclosure agreements would be further weakened by the legislation. Those who enter into such an agreement would still be allowed to participate in an investigation into sexual harassment. The bill would also void any nondisclosure clauses related to future claims of discrimination unless a worker is notified he or she can still talk to a reporting agency.
Cuomo had pushed lawmakers in recent weeks to come to a deal on legislation that would lower the “severe or pervasive” standard but hadn't publicly taken a position on eliminating the Faragher-Ellerth defense. He cheered the bill in a statement Wednesday evening.
“Under the status quo, sporadic sexual harassment is permissible as long as it is not pervasive—that's unacceptable and we are changing it,” Cuomo said. “With the passage of this bill, we will make it easier for claims to be brought forward and send a strong message that when it comes to sexual harassment in the workplace, time is up.”
READ MORE:
Cuomo, Lawmakers Reach Agreement on Rape Statute, Sexual Harassment Laws
Cuomo Urges NY Lawmakers to Address Rape Statute, Sexual Harassment Before Leaving Albany
NY Lawmakers Seek Changes to Strengthen Sexual Harassment Laws
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250