Bill to Curb Solitary Confinement Fails But Cuomo Set to Implement Reforms
Cuomo, along with leaders from both houses of the Legislature, confirmed in a joint statement that a bill to restrict the use of solitary confinement and limit who's eligible for the punishment would not get a vote on the floor of either chamber.
June 21, 2019 at 12:11 AM
5 minute read
As a sweeping measure to restrict the use of solitary confinement fell short of enactment Thursday night, the Cuomo administration and lawmakers reached an understanding to allow some of those reforms to be implemented by the executive branch.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo, along with leaders from both houses of the Legislature, confirmed in a joint statement that a bill to restrict the use of solitary confinement and limit who's eligible for the punishment would not get a vote on the floor of either chamber.
“While we are disappointed that HALT legislation could not be passed this year, we have reached an agreement to dramatically reduce the use of solitary confinement in correctional facilities,” the statement said.
Instead, some of the changes that were proposed in the larger bill will be implemented administratively by the Cuomo administration.
Prisoners will not be allowed to remain in a special housing unit for solitary confinement beyond 30 days under the new rules. Advocates and lawmakers had pushed for a cap of 15 days.
The new rules will prohibit vulnerable incarcerated individuals from being housed in a special housing unit, like children, pregnant women and disabled individuals. They'll also ensure that only serious misconduct can land someone in solitary confinement, not petty offenses.
The state Department of Corrections and Community Supervision will be required to expand the use of specialized units where those released from solitary confinement can still be housed before returning to the general population area of a facility. Individuals housed in those units will receive specialized treatment and programming to encourage rehabilitation.
Individuals housed in the specialized units also will be able to earn an early release back into the general population area if they complete the programming assigned to them by staff. At no time will staff at the prison or jail be able to deny essential services to inmates as a form of discipline, including restricted diets.
The changes also will require more training for staff that work within special housing units on implicit bias, trauma-informed care, dispute resolution and more. Staff will only be able to send an individual to solitary confinement if there's a safety risk to others.
It's unclear whether the original legislation, called the Humane Alternatives to Long-Term Solitary Confinement Act, ever had legs among lawmakers, at least in the State Senate. It's already passed once in the Assembly, but the chamber decided not take similar action this year.
Sources familiar with negotiations on the measure in the Senate said there was a real concern that the bill would have been vetoed by Cuomo if they passed it with the Assembly. That's because Cuomo, in recent days, expressed concerns about the alleged cost of the bill, which would require new units to house prisoners away from others but outside solitary confinement.
Cuomo claimed the mandate could cost the state upward of $350 million and localities a combined $1 billion. The bill's sponsor, State Sen. Luis Sepulveda, D-Bronx, had disagreed on what the final cost of the bill would be.
Assemblyman Dan Quart, D-Manhattan, was a strong supporter of the measure, which he co-sponsored in the Assembly. He criticized the various positions against the legislation, including Cuomo's concerns over cost.
“This is not about financial feasibility, it's not about political will, and it's not about safety; passing this bill is about people's lives.” Quart said. “The governor's refusal to sign legislation that has broad democratic support is inexplicable and utterly disappointing and come January, passing the full HALT bill must be a priority.”
Advocates who support the bill had been on a hunger strike at the state Capitol and in other areas of the state for more than a week over the Legislature's failure to move on the legislation. Details on what was happening with the bill were few and far between in recent days, with some lawmakers saying the bill was still on the table until early Thursday evening.
The #HALTsolitary Campaign, a coalition of criminal justice groups who pushed the measure, criticized Democrats in a statement Thursday evening for crafting the deal with Cuomo, rather than passing the legislation.
They had expected the bill to move after Democrats took control of the chamber this year for the first time in nearly a decade. The legislation failed to come to the floor, despite a majority of members signing on to sponsor the bill.
“Following last year's election when Democrats took control of the State Senate we were repeatedly given assurances and promises that HALT was a priority for both houses,” the coalition said. “Instead leadership back-slid to politics as usual, where just three people, Governor Cuomo, Senate Leader Stewart-Cousins and Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie thwarted democracy and undercut the ability of their members to legislate on issues and values that they care about.”
Cuomo's office didn't give a timeline on when the new administrative actions would be implemented. Some can happen immediately, like limits on the use of solitary confinement. Others, like expanding specialized units, may take more time.
READ MORE:
Lawmakers Plan Passage of Bill Decriminalizing Marijuana in New York
Lawmakers Pass Bill to Extend Statute of Limitations for Rape in Second, Third Degree
Lawmakers Approve Bill to End 'Gay Panic' Defense, Cuomo Expected to Sign
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit
4 minute readRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
Trending Stories
- 1The Lawyers Waging the Legal Fight Against the Trump Administration
- 2McDermott's Onetime London Leader Headed to Pillsbury
- 3A&O Shearman To Lose Another Five Lawyers to EY
- 4Pearl Cohen Enters San Francisco Market Via Combination With IP Boutique
- 5'Incredibly Complicated'? Antitrust Litigators Identify Pros and Cons of Proposed One Agency Act
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250