Changes Coming to NY AG Role in Police-Involved Deaths, Cuomo Says
Cuomo said he plans to make the change after lawmakers failed to approve a bill during the final hours of this year's legislative session that would have codified the executive order into law.
June 21, 2019 at 03:01 PM
4 minute read
Gov. Andrew Cuomo said Friday he plans to adjust an executive order he issued four years ago that directs cases where an unarmed civilian is killed by a member of law enforcement to the state Attorney General's Office, rather than a local district attorney.
Cuomo said he plans to make the change after lawmakers failed to approve a bill during the final hours of this year's legislative session that would have codified the executive order into law.
“I'm going to adjust that. Having a special prosecutor for police misconduct is very important,” Cuomo said. “I proposed the legislation many times. They have refused to pass it.”
He had made a final push in recent weeks for lawmakers to approve the legislation, which would permanently refer those cases to the Attorney General's Office. The measure is supported by New York Attorney General Letitia James, who even proposed expanding it last year to give her office jurisdiction over other police-involved crimes, like sexual assault.
Cuomo warned earlier this month that, if lawmakers did not approve the bill, he would consider letting the executive order expire. Those orders are not permanent once they're handed down; Cuomo has had to routinely reissue the directive for it to continue as is.
He said Friday that he's now planning to do something else in place of, or to build on, the executive order. He didn't elaborate on what that would look like.
“To prompt, provoke, catalyze, change I said I will end the executive order if you don't pass legislation as a way to get them to do something,” Cuomo said. “They didn't do anything. So, now we'll go do step two, I'm not sure exactly what that is.”
As part of his request to the Legislature, Cuomo wanted a permanent office established in the Attorney General's Office to investigate police-involved fatalities. That would come with funding and resources, which he said Friday the office doesn't currently have. Cuomo served for one term as the state's attorney general before he was elected governor.
“It's not really a function that the Attorney General's Office is suited for in my opinion,” Cuomo said. “They really don't do criminal cases like this … they don't have the resources.”
Lawmakers, as recently as Tuesday, did not share details on what the status of the legislation was. A bill that would have codified and expanded Cuomo's executive order appeared to gain momentum in recent weeks, but stalled in committee during the final days of session. It was not included in a final omnibus bill approved by lawmakers early Friday morning.
The standalone measure was sponsored by State Sen. Jamaal Bailey, D-Bronx, and Assemblyman Nick Perry, D-Brooklyn. It would have had the Attorney General's Office handle all cases where a civilian dies after an interaction with law enforcement, regardless of whether they were armed or not. It would also make certain grand jury proceedings more readily available to the public.
The Attorney General's Office would have also had to recuse itself when someone dies after an interaction with the State Police. Instead, a special investigator and prosecutor would be appointed by a county judge to handle those cases since the State Police is under the control of the Attorney General's Office.
Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie, D-Bronx, said in recent days that members of his conference supported the measure. It failed to come to the floor for a vote before this year's legislative session ended early Friday morning.
The District Attorneys Association of the State of New York, which represents the state's prosecutors, didn't have a position on the bill. Albany County District Attorney David Soares, the group's outgoing president, said recently that he would personally like to see the executive order codified. That position isn't shared by all of the state's prosecutors.
The executive order, first issued in 2015, was intended to prevent what some have alleged could be a conflict of interest for local district attorneys to handle investigations into members of law enforcement who they may know personally, or be more likely to give the benefit of the doubt.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCourt System Names New Administrative Judges for New York City Courts in Leadership Shakeup
3 minute readRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250