Changes Coming to NY AG Role in Police-Involved Deaths, Cuomo Says
Cuomo said he plans to make the change after lawmakers failed to approve a bill during the final hours of this year's legislative session that would have codified the executive order into law.
June 21, 2019 at 03:01 PM
4 minute read
Gov. Andrew Cuomo said Friday he plans to adjust an executive order he issued four years ago that directs cases where an unarmed civilian is killed by a member of law enforcement to the state Attorney General's Office, rather than a local district attorney.
Cuomo said he plans to make the change after lawmakers failed to approve a bill during the final hours of this year's legislative session that would have codified the executive order into law.
“I'm going to adjust that. Having a special prosecutor for police misconduct is very important,” Cuomo said. “I proposed the legislation many times. They have refused to pass it.”
He had made a final push in recent weeks for lawmakers to approve the legislation, which would permanently refer those cases to the Attorney General's Office. The measure is supported by New York Attorney General Letitia James, who even proposed expanding it last year to give her office jurisdiction over other police-involved crimes, like sexual assault.
Cuomo warned earlier this month that, if lawmakers did not approve the bill, he would consider letting the executive order expire. Those orders are not permanent once they're handed down; Cuomo has had to routinely reissue the directive for it to continue as is.
He said Friday that he's now planning to do something else in place of, or to build on, the executive order. He didn't elaborate on what that would look like.
“To prompt, provoke, catalyze, change I said I will end the executive order if you don't pass legislation as a way to get them to do something,” Cuomo said. “They didn't do anything. So, now we'll go do step two, I'm not sure exactly what that is.”
As part of his request to the Legislature, Cuomo wanted a permanent office established in the Attorney General's Office to investigate police-involved fatalities. That would come with funding and resources, which he said Friday the office doesn't currently have. Cuomo served for one term as the state's attorney general before he was elected governor.
“It's not really a function that the Attorney General's Office is suited for in my opinion,” Cuomo said. “They really don't do criminal cases like this … they don't have the resources.”
Lawmakers, as recently as Tuesday, did not share details on what the status of the legislation was. A bill that would have codified and expanded Cuomo's executive order appeared to gain momentum in recent weeks, but stalled in committee during the final days of session. It was not included in a final omnibus bill approved by lawmakers early Friday morning.
The standalone measure was sponsored by State Sen. Jamaal Bailey, D-Bronx, and Assemblyman Nick Perry, D-Brooklyn. It would have had the Attorney General's Office handle all cases where a civilian dies after an interaction with law enforcement, regardless of whether they were armed or not. It would also make certain grand jury proceedings more readily available to the public.
The Attorney General's Office would have also had to recuse itself when someone dies after an interaction with the State Police. Instead, a special investigator and prosecutor would be appointed by a county judge to handle those cases since the State Police is under the control of the Attorney General's Office.
Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie, D-Bronx, said in recent days that members of his conference supported the measure. It failed to come to the floor for a vote before this year's legislative session ended early Friday morning.
The District Attorneys Association of the State of New York, which represents the state's prosecutors, didn't have a position on the bill. Albany County District Attorney David Soares, the group's outgoing president, said recently that he would personally like to see the executive order codified. That position isn't shared by all of the state's prosecutors.
The executive order, first issued in 2015, was intended to prevent what some have alleged could be a conflict of interest for local district attorneys to handle investigations into members of law enforcement who they may know personally, or be more likely to give the benefit of the doubt.
READ MORE:
Bill Codifying NY AG Role in Police-Involved Deaths Scheduled for Key Committee Vote
Cuomo Renews Push to Codify NY AG Role as Special Prosecutor in Police-Involved Deaths
Proposal Would Codify NY AG Role as Special Prosecutor in Police-Involved Deaths
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Didn't Notice Patient Wasn't Breathing': $13.7M Verdict Against Anesthesiologists
- 2'Astronomical' Interest Rates: $1B Settlement to Resolve Allegations of 'Predatory' Lending Cancels $534M in Small-Business Debts
- 3Senator Plans to Reintroduce Bill to Split 9th Circuit
- 4Law Firms Converge to Defend HIPAA Regulation
- 5Judge Denies Retrial Bid by Ex-U.S. Sen. Menendez Over Evidentiary Error
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250