Queens Supreme Court in Jamaica, Queens. Photo: Rick KopsteinNew York Legislature Authorizes 4 More Justices in NYC, Upstate
The change was included in an omnibus bill approved by lawmakers overnight during the final hours of this year's legislative session, which ended Friday.
June 21, 2019 at 03:55 PM
3 minute read
State lawmakers in New York approved legislation early Friday that will add three state Supreme Court justices to the bench in New York City and one justice to the Tompkins County Court.
The change was included in an omnibus bill approved by lawmakers overnight during the final hours of this year's legislative session, which ended Friday.
The change will add one state Supreme Court justice in three of the city's boroughs:
- Queens Supreme Court, which will now have 41 justices.
- Bronx Supreme Court which will now have 27 justices.
- Richmond County Supreme Court, or Staten Island, which will now have five justices.
The Tompkins County Court will now have three justices.
The changes were originally included in a stand-alone bill from State Sen. Brad Hoylman, D-Manhattan, and Assemblywoman Barbara Lifton, a Democrat who represents Tompkins County in its entirety.
The legislation is intended to help address the ever-growing amount of litigation in those areas, according to a memorandum included with the original bill. The measure was included, verbatim, in the omnibus bill approved by lawmakers.
“Currently there are insufficient numbers of judges to handle the growing case load in certain parts of the State,” the memo read. “This bill would help to alleviate this problem, make the Unified Court System more efficient and thereby better serve the interests of the citizens of this State.”
A spokesman for the state Office of Court Administration said it was happy to see lawmakers approve the change.
“We are always pleased when the state legislature is able to avail us with additional resources as we continue our focus on court efficiencies and case backlogs,” said Lucian Chalfen, a spokesman for the OCA.
The new judges will first be elected later this year, according to the bill, meaning no special election will be called to fill the additional seats in the meantime. Justices of the State Supreme Court were paid $208,000 annually as of last year; Tompkins County Court justices are paid $122,700, according to the state Judiciary Law.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Mayor's Advisory Committee To Hold Hearing on Fitness of Judicial Candidates
2 minute read
Mayor's Advisory Committee To Hold Hearing on Fitness of Judicial Candidates
1 minute read
Mayor's Advisory Committee To Hold Hearing on Fitness of Judicial Candidates
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-85
- 3Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 4Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 5Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
