Bankruptcy Judge Denies Madoff Trustee Summary Judgment in Clawback Suit
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Stuart M. Bernstein nixed trustee Irving H. Picard's motion for summary judgment on his fraudulent transfer claim to recover transfers from Legacy Capital Ltd.'s account with Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities that were made within two years of its founder being arrested for securities fraud in 2008.
June 25, 2019 at 06:07 PM
3 minute read
A Manhattan federal judge on Tuesday blocked an attempt by the trustee of the Bernie Madoff fund to claw back, ahead of trial, $86 million in allegedly fraudulent transfers an investor had received as part of Madoff's Ponzi scheme.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Stuart M. Bernstein of the Southern District of New York nixed trustee Irving H. Picard's motion for summary judgment on his fraudulent transfer claim to recover transfers from Legacy Capital Ltd.'s account with Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities that were made within two years of its founder being arrested for securities fraud in 2008.
In the ruling, Bernstein said that Picard was entitled to go after the funds because the transactions were clearly part of Madoff's $65 billion Ponzi scheme, considered the largest and longest-running in U.S. history.
However, Bernstein said, important questions remained as to Legacy's defense that it had taken the transfers “for value and good faith.”
“The Trustee has shown that there is no genuine material issue of fact regarding his prima facie case and those facts are deemed established for the purposes of this adversary proceeding. The Trustee's motion for summary judgment is otherwise denied,” he wrote in a 30-page decision.
Tuesday's ruling followed Bernstein's dismissal in 2016 of the bulk of the trustee's $220 million clawback suit against the British Virgin Islands-based investment vehicle and Khronos LLC, which had provided it accounting services. The earlier ruling dismissed all claims against Khronos, and found that Picard could not argue Legacy acted in bad faith because the company didn't have actual knowledge that Madoff was not trading in real securities.
As to value, Bernstein said on Tuesday that differences over the Ponzi scheme's start date and U.S. Treasury bills that Madoff had bought and resold to his customers would have to be resolved on a fuller record at trial.
“These discrepancies and the relationship, if any, between BLMIS's purchase of T-Bills from brokers and the apparent resale of a portion of those purchases to customers like Legacy raise factual issues that the Court cannot resolve on this motion,” Bernstein said.
The trustee's office declined to comment on Tuesday. An attorney for Legacy did not respond to a request for comment.
Madoff pleaded guilty in 2009 to charges of securities fraud, investment adviser fraud, mail fraud, wire fraud, money laundering, making false statements, perjury, making false filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and theft from an employee benefit plan. He was sentenced later that year to 150 years in prison.
Picard, a Baker & Hostetler partner, was appointed in 2008 under the Securities Investor Protection Act to serve as trustee for the liquidation of BLMIS. According to the Madoff Trustee Initiative, recoveries and settlements in the case totaled more than $13.4 billion as of June 21.
Picard, as trustee, is represented by David J. Sheehan, Oren J. Warshavsky and Jason S. Oliver of Baker & Hostetler.
Legacy is represented by Nicholas F. Kajon of Stevens & Lee.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Mulls Big Changes to Banking Regulation, Unsettling the Industry
Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Trending Stories
- 1De-Mystifying the Ethics of the Attorney Transition Process, Part 1
- 2Alex Spiro Accuses Prosecutors of 'Unethical' Comments in Adams' Bribery Case
- 3Cannabis Took a Hit on Red Wednesday, but Hope Is On the Way
- 4Ben Brafman Defending Celebrity Rabbi in Lawsuit by Miami Hotel
- 5People in the News—Dec. 23, 2024—Barley Snyder, Marshall Dennehey
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250