Ex-CKR Marketing Head Claims Retaliation After Divulging Boss' 'Kissing' Footage
Catherine Acosta claims CKR managing partner Jeffrey Rinde retaliated against her after she informed her assistant that security cameras caught Rinde and the assistant kissing in an elevator.
June 27, 2019 at 02:49 PM
4 minute read
The former top marketing official at beleaguered CKR Law has accused the firm's lawyers of repeatedly making hostile comments about her same-sex relationship, in a new discrimination suit against the firm.
Catherine Acosta also claims the managing partner, Jeffrey Rinde, retaliated against her after she informed her assistant that security cameras caught Rinde and the assistant kissing in an elevator.
Acosta, a former CKR marketing director, said in a suit filed Wednesday in Manhattan Supreme Court against Rinde and the firm that she was fired in January after a series of discriminatory comments by people at the firm.
One male lawyer asked “if she was done with men forever, or if he could do anything to change her mind,” her lawsuit claims, while another lawyer hit on her, commented on her headshot and asked if she had “less professional pictures to share.”
After her same-sex wedding in July, Acosta said, a female partner would continuously sit on “Acosta's desk wearing skirts with the intention to discuss plaintiff Acosta's homosexual lifestyle.” One male partner said he officiated weddings, but not of “that nature,” her suit claims.
Acosta said Rinde, the managing partner, let her work from home starting in October because the comments and actions of the firm's lawyers, as well as her commute from New Jersey, made her anxiety worse.
But after Acosta told her assistant that security footage showed that the assistant had been “kissing” Rinde in an office elevator, Rinde began ignoring Acosta's emails and in November insisted that Acosta start working more hours in the office, her lawsuit claims.
“Acosta reluctantly agreed to increase her time in the office based on defendant Rinde agreeing to provide her with an office sufficiently removed from the attorneys who had previously created the hostile working environment,” Acosta's complaint said. The following day, however, Acosta said she learned that CKR's human resources manager “was openly discussing plaintiff Acosta's disabling medical condition.”
The suit alleges that Acosta told Rinde that her privacy rights were violated and she couldn't work in the office, but said she never got a response from Rinde. When December rolled around, she didn't get a performance review or bonus that others received, and on Jan. 18 she was fired, “allegedly due to her inability to work in the New York City office,” the suit said.
To add insult to injury, Acosta claims, her assistant, the one allegedly seen kissing Rinde, was promoted to fill her position “and, shortly thereafter, permitted … to work from home.”
The suit marks more unfavorable publicity for CKR, which has seen a series of lawyer exits after it struggled to pay partner draws.
ALM reported earlier this year that many partners weren't paid their draws for several months or weren't paid the amounts they were owed under their contracts. Dozens of lawyers appear to have left the firm, including a bankruptcy team described by sources as a key part of the firm's business. CKR has insisted that its financial situation won't be hurt by the departures and has said its cash flow situation is improving.
Acosta's suit includes claims under the New York City Human Rights Law for a hostile work environment and failure to accommodate a disability. She seeks compensatory and punitive damages but her lawsuit did not provide a dollar amount.
Rinde and other senior partners at his firm did not respond to a comment request about the lawsuit.
Peter Heck, Acosta's lawyer at the firm of Niedweske Barber, also did not respond to inquiries.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250