Citing Racial Impact, Legal Aid Society Decries MTA Resolution to Ban Repeat Criminal Offenders
A "ban for those who live with certain convictions is not the answer and it only further disproportionately impacts black and brown men who have been profiled by police in trumped up stings,” said Tina Luongo of The Legal Aid Society.
June 28, 2019 at 12:12 PM
2 minute read
Raising concerns that the MTA will be “exiling the poor” and some profiled African Americans from New York City's transit system, The Legal Aid Society has issued a statement decrying an MTA resolution that supports banning repeat criminal offenders from mass transit.
On Monday, a Metropolitan Transit Authority committee agreed to consider a resolution that would call for a ban on offenders who repeatedly commit crimes on New York City's subways or other modes of public transportation, according to news reports.
Then on Wednesday, the MTA passed a resolution publicly supporting a ban on transit system criminal recidivists, such as those who commit repeated sexual offenses or robberies.
The MTA, a public benefit corporation that oversees public transportation across a large swath of the state, cannot institute such a ban itself, according to news reports. But the resolution, the reports said, called for the state legislature to take action, such as by authorizing courts to ban repeat offenders from the city's transit system for some unspecified amount of time.
On Monday evening, after the MTA's committee said it was considering calling for the ban, Tina Luongo, attorney-in-charge of The Legal Aid Society's criminal defense practice, issued a statement that said “unwanted and inappropriate touching on the subway is never welcomed,” but a ban “for those who live with certain convictions is not the answer and it only further disproportionately impacts black and brown men who have been profiled by police in trumped up stings.”
Luongo added that “New Yorkers rely on mass transit [for] access to jobs, services, educational opportunities and treatment programs,” and “this proposal is tantamount to locking someone away and it will deny their right to movement.”
“Yet again, the MTA Board and President are exiling the poor. This is not answer.” Luongo said in the release.
Contacted Thursday evening and Friday, a spokesman for the MTA did not comment in response to The Legal Aid Society.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit
4 minute readRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250