'Gay Panic' Defense Banned in New York After Cuomo Signs Bill
The bill has been championed for the past several years by Assemblyman Daniel O'Donnell, a former public defender, and State Sen. Brad Hoylman. Both are openly gay members of the Legislature who represent parts of Manhattan.
June 30, 2019 at 03:48 PM
5 minute read
New York state, as of Sunday, will no longer allow defendants accused of murder to plead down those charges to manslaughter by saying their actions were the result of an extreme emotional disturbance caused by the discovery of someone's sexual orientation or gender identity.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed legislation Sunday to eliminate that option, which is more commonly known as the “gay panic” or “trans panic” defense.
The bill has been championed for the past several years by Assemblyman Daniel O'Donnell, a former public defender, and State Sen. Brad Hoylman. Both are openly gay members of the Legislature who represent parts of Manhattan.
“By banning the so-called gay and trans panic defense, New York is sending a message to prosecutors, defense attorneys, juries and judges that a victim's LGBTQ identity shouldn't be weaponized against them,” Hoylman said.
The bill was signed the same day as WorldPride, a global celebration of LGBTQ pride that was hosted in New York City this year. It's an especially significant year for New York City—this month marks 50 years since the riots at the Stonewall Inn in Manhattan, which many credit as a catalyst for the modern day LGBTQ rights movement.
Cuomo, before signing the bill Sunday, decried that New York still had the “gay panic” and “trans panic” defenses as an option in the first place.
“We have now as a law in this state, something called the gay and trans panic defense. That a person can argue – they were so emotionally disturbed when they found out a person was gay or trans that that is actually a justification or an excuse for murder,” Cuomo said. “Not in this state.”
The bill was partly inspired by the story of a transgender woman, Islan Nettles, who died in 2013 after she was struck by a man who discovered her gender identity.
Her assailant was sentenced to 12 years in prison after saying that, when Nettles revealed she was transgender, he became enraged and attacked her because of it. He had later turned himself in to the police and entered a guilty plea.
Her mother, Delores Nettles, was invited to the bill signing Sunday and celebrated the legislation becoming law in a statement.
“In 2013, my daughter Islan was killed in Harlem for being who she was. Her attacker used the discriminatory 'trans panic' defense,” Nettles said. “I am so grateful that New York is banning this legislation so that no mother has to go through this again. We must keep fighting so that all trans people can live free from violence and discrimination.”
The bill wouldn't eliminate the option completely for defendants to say they were influenced by an extreme emotional disturbance, but it would set limits on that defense.
Defendants facing murder charges would no longer be able to plead them down to manslaughter by saying their actions were driven by the discovery of a victim's sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, gender expression or sex assigned at birth, according to the text of the bill.
The legislation had support from the New York State Bar Association and the LGBT Bar Association of Greater New York, whose board president also attended the bill signing Sunday.
“This shows the kind of change that good government can and should bring. Banning the trans and gay panic defense is a huge step toward equality for LGBTQ New Yorkers,” said Kristen Prata Browde, board president of the LGBT Bar.
The bill had been opposed by a coalition of public defender organizations in New York City. They wrote in a memo to lawmakers before the bill passed that eliminating the defense would lead to more defendants serving longer sentences in state prison. The groups argued that the legislation would encourage incarceration, rather than benefit the LGBTQ community.
“Increased dependence on criminalization and incarceration, and on the tools of the state used to lock more people in cages, will not bring an end to discrimination and violence against LGBTQ+ people,” the groups wrote. “By eliminating this defense, we will be providing the state with yet another tool to incarcerate more people.”
The Legal Aid Society, Bronx Defenders, Brooklyn Defender Services, New York State Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and others were on the memo.
The legislation didn't start to move until Cuomo included it on a list of items he wanted the Legislature to address before they left Albany for the year. It was passed, nearly unanimously, by both the Senate and Assembly in the final days of this year's legislative session, which ended in late June.
Not all of Cuomo's priorities were approved by the Legislature. A bill that would have legalized the option for same-sex and infertile couples to pay a woman to carry their child did not end up becoming law. It hit a snag in the Assembly where lawmakers had varied concerns, particularly about whether the surrogates would be protected under the law.
The “gay panic” legislation was easier to move. Only one lawmaker voted against it between the Assembly and the Senate, though it had failed to pass in recent years. The changes enacted by the new law will take effect immediately, according to the bill.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readEric Adams Trial Set for April as Defense Urges Dismissal of Bribery Count
Major Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1NY District Attorneys Are Still No Fans of Revamped Misconduct Watchdog
- 2ICC Issues Arrest Warrants for Israel's Prime Minister Over Alleged War Crimes in Gaza
- 3Attorney Responds to Outten & Golden Managing Partner's Letter on Dropped Client
- 4Attracted to Thompson Hine's Fee Flexibility, Morgan Lewis Litigator Switches Firms in Chicago
- 5Phila. Attorney Hit With 5-Year Suspension for Mismanaging Firm and Mishandling Cases
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250