Studying the Destructive Nature of Solitary Confinement
Witnessing firsthand the awful consequences of subjecting human beings to solitary confinement and looking into the eyes of those inmates struggling to maintain a foothold on reality and sanity is painful.
July 01, 2019 at 09:54 AM
3 minute read
The New York legislative session ended last week without action on the HALT bill that would have barred the use of solitary confinement in ways that violate international law. Even without this action, the debate over solitary confinement is sure to continue in New York State's legislatures and others around the country. It is clear by studying the comparison of the reactions of humans subjected to solitary confinement to the reactions of primates who are held similarly gives important new insight into why solitary confinement must be ended.
One of us has long experience with the practice of solitary confinement in prisons and jails as a litigator, advocate and scholar. In his work, he has seen how solitary confinement imposes psychological pain which is so great that it often leads otherwise normal human beings who are subjected to it to either become psychotic or if not psychotic to engage in behavior indicative of great mental pain. People in solitary commit suicide at a rate far in excess of people in any other setting; they engage as well often in other self-destructive behavior including self-mutilation, feces throwing and violence. They lose the ability to concentrate and often act erratically and fearfully. The physical and psychological damage solitary inflicts is often permanent. Witnessing firsthand the awful consequences of subjecting human beings to solitary confinement and looking into the eyes of those inmates struggling to maintain a foothold on reality and sanity is painful.
The other of us is an expert on animal law. He, too, has seen the pain of solitary albeit in a different setting imposed on a different species. Currently, tens of thousands of primates are held in solitary confinement in scientific laboratories across the United States. He has observed shockingly similar behavior in those primates to what his colleague and co-author observed in prisoners in solitary. Nonhuman primates in solitary confinement become agitated, confused and distraught. Like humans, they often mutilate themselves, tearing out their hair, and attacking their own bodies. They also scream continuously, beat themselves against their cages and exhibit other self-destructive behaviors. As with humans, solitary confinement is for them a searing experience. It frightens, disorients and shatters well-being.
That solitary confinement can have such a powerful deleterious effect even across species demonstrates that it must end in all its forms. Specifically, the New York legislature next term should return to its consideration of the HALT act and pass it. In addition, laws to reform the use of solitary of non-human animals in laboratories should also be passed. Without waiting a moment longer, moreover, administrators of prisons and labs can take steps themselves to end these practices. These actions would ensure the suffering we impose on hundreds of thousands of defenseless beings is relegated to the past. In short, the lessons we learned from looking closely at the harm inflicted by solitary on creatures we care for should be known to everyone and not be wasted.
Michael B. Mushlin and David N. Cassuto are professors of law at the Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAttorney Responds to Outten & Golden Managing Partner's Letter on Dropped Client
3 minute readLetter to the Editor: Law Journal Used Misleading Photo for Article on Election Observers
1 minute readNYC's Administrative Court's to Publish Some Rulings in the New York Law Journal Is Welcomed. But It Should Go Further
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250