Effort to Tame Court Backlog Set to Expand After Successful Stint in Manhattan
Led by Westchester Supreme Court Justice Barry Warhit, the program has wrapped up a three-month push to tame backlog in Manhattan and is expected to expand to another borough this fall.
July 03, 2019 at 02:21 PM
3 minute read
An effort spearheaded by a Westchester County Supreme Court judge to resolve some of the city's oldest criminal cases is set to expand once again, after a successful stint in Manhattan.
Launched this January in the Bronx, the Special Term Additional Resource Trial—or START—aims to dispose of all cases in which criminal defendants have been locked up and awaiting trial for more than two years, and it comes amid a wider push by Chief Judge Janet DiFiore's Excellence Initiative to eliminate delays, streamline case management and expedite the process of administering justice.
The effort, led by Supreme Court Justice Barry Warhit, has wrapped up another three months of taming backlog in Manhattan and is expected to expand to another borough this fall, though court officials said they were not yet prepared to announce the jurisdiction.
According to information provided by the Office of Court Administration, a total of 262 cases were resolved in the Bronx from January to March, including 221 guilty pleas and 22 cases that were dismissed on application of the prosecution. In the three months that followed, the courts said 145 cases were resolved as a part of the START initiative in Manhattan.
Warhit, supervising judge for criminal matters in Westchester County, said the aim of the program is to get prosecutors and defense attorneys in the same courtroom to focus the best and most efficient ways to resolve on individual cases. Typically, Warhit said he will conferences the cases of about 20 different defendants on any given day in a bid to dispose of them without a trial.
Senior prosecutors, who have the authority to sign off on plea deals, are always in the room, and discussions take into account the seriousness of the offense, any criminal record that a defendant might have, and the strengths and weaknesses of both the prosecution and defense's case.
“I think both sides in that situation are trying to resolve a case that case be resolved before trial,” Warhit said.
Warhit said his role is to urge both sides to find common ground and to make sure defendants understand the benefits and potential downsides of taking a plea deal, as opposed to going to trial. Sometimes, he will allow defendants to meet privately with family in the courtroom or even briefly adjourn the proceedings to allow the defendants to mull their options overnight.
“By keeping adjournments extremely short, it facilitates dispositions,” he said.
A collaborative effort, the initiative has seen significant buy-in from both prosecutors and defense attorneys, as well as the city Department of Corrections, which has accommodated requests to transport defendants to court on a revised schedule, Warhit said.
“The key is to bring everyone together to focus on the case,” he said.
According to the courts' statistics, only six out of 262 cases went to trial in the Bronx. In Manhattan, 10 defendants are currently on trial in cases that were sent out of the START program. A verdict was reached separately in one trial, and two pleas were taken before other judges after cases were sent to them for trial.
A spokesman said the courts were not prepared to announce what jurisdiction would next receive the START initiative's services, but an move was expected for the fall. Any decisions on the program's expansion are left to Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence Marks.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRelaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
5 minute readBipartisan Lawmakers to Hochul Urge Greater Student Loan Forgiveness for Public-Interest Lawyers
'Playing the Clock'?: Hochul Says NY's Discovery Loophole Is to Blame for Wide Dismissal of Criminal Cases
So Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Paul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Continues Finance Practice Build
- 2Chancery: Common Stock Worthless in 'Jacobson v. Akademos' and Transaction Was Entirely Fair
- 3'We Neither Like Nor Dislike the Fifth Circuit'
- 4Local Boutique Expands Significantly, Hiring Litigator Who Won $63M Verdict Against City of Miami Commissioner
- 5Senior Associates' Billing Rates See The Biggest Jump
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250