Cabán Campaign Eyes 114 Disputed Ballots Ahead of Queens DA Recount
Attorneys from both sides were expected to appear Tuesday morning in Queens Supreme Court for initial proceedings over invalidated ballots.
July 08, 2019 at 02:37 PM
4 minute read
Tiffany Cabán's campaign is targeting more than 100 affidavit ballots it says were wrongly invalidated by city Board of Elections officials, as the career public defender trailed Queens Borough president Melinda Katz by 16 votes in the Queens district attorney primary race ahead of an automatic recount this week.
The campaign said Monday that 114 ballots from Queens County Democratic voters had been discarded because they did not state the voter's party affiliation. According to the campaign, poll workers are required under New York state law to ensure that voters include party affiliation on affidavit ballots, and failure to restore legitimate ballots would amount to voter disenfranchisement.
Cabán's camp said that it would continue to review discarded ballots and that the total number could grow in the coming weeks if other instances of supposedly improper invalidation became apparent.
“We will also be closely monitoring the hand recount, which could yield hundreds of new votes improperly read by machine scanners,” campaign spokeswoman Monica Klein said in a statement. “When every valid vote is counted, we are confident that we will win.”
Cabán claimed victory on election night last month as she held a nearly 1,100 vote lead with absentee and affidavit ballots uncounted. Katz, for her part, claimed she was the winner after the count of outstanding ballots put her in a razor-thin lead.
Attorneys from both sides were expected to appear Tuesday morning in Queens County Supreme Court for initial proceedings regarding the invalidated ballots.
Matthew Rey, a spokesman for Katz' campaign, said Monday that it would be up to the court to decide whether to count all or none of the disputed ballots.
“We believe that every valid vote cast should count,” Rey said.
Katz, who has served as borough president since 2014, declared victory last week after a review of the uncounted paper ballots pushed her slightly ahead of Cabán, who had led by 1,100 votes. As of Monday, just 16 votes separated the two heading into a manual recount, which occurs within a .5% margin of the overall vote.
“It is a narrow margin, but it's a margin of victory nonetheless,” the spokesman said. “The recount process is mandatory, and it will confirm Melinda Katz as the Democratic nominee.”
The official recount was scheduled to begin 10 a.m. Tuesday at the Queens County Board of Elections machine facility, with the unpacking and marking of ballots by election district. Actual counting was expected to begin Wednesday and could take anywhere from one to three weeks, Cabán's campaign said.
Cabán's team is also eyeing between 300 and 400 additional votes that were not recognized by voting machines but could be reflected in the recount. The campaign said it was not sure which way those votes would fall, though they could prove decisive to the election.
Over the past week, her campaign has cited close ties between the local officials and the Queens Democratic party as potentially raising conflicts of interest with the Board of Elections and the local courts. However, the campaign said it had not seen any evidence of fraudulent activity on the part of the BOE.
Rey responded Monday by calling those allegations “irresponsible” and “corrosive to the Democratic process.
“Every fair-minded, neutral observer has agreed there has been no foul play, and these allegations are reprehensible,” he said.
Cabán's camp has also pointed to pending state legislation it said would make it harder to disqualify affidavit ballots for missing non-pertinent information, such as party affiliation. The bill, which has cleared both the Assembly and the Senate, has not yet been forwarded to Gov. Andrew Cuomo for his signature.
Because the legislation originated in the Assembly, it falls to Speaker Carl Heastie, D-Bronx, to sent the legislation along to Cuomo, who would have 10 days to act before the bill becomes law.
Cabán's campaign believes the legislation, if approved, would take effect immediately and could impact whether the disputed ballots are counted in the Queens DA race.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCourt System Names New Administrative Judges for New York City Courts in Leadership Shakeup
3 minute readRetired Judge Susan Cacace Elected Westchester DA in Win for Democrats
In Eric Adams Case and Other Corruption Matters, Prosecutors Seem Bent on Pushing Boundaries of Their Already Awesome Power
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250