Typically used to guard against defaults on loans, an acceleration clause allows a non-breaching party, in the event of default, to require payment of the entire amounts outstanding under the agreement. In the software contracts context, acceleration clauses are regular, including but not limited to, standard licenses, joint venture agreements, development agreements and vendor agreements.

Though drafted to protect the licensor, an election of remedies pursuant to an acceleration clause recently doomed a licensor’s claim for an alleged breach of a software agreement by the successor licensee. See IT Portfolio v. Facsimile Commc’ns Indus., 2019 WL 2498371 (S.D.N.Y. May 31, 2019). The same election also precluded an unjust enrichment claim against the successor. This column focuses on the unintended consequences of accelerating payments under a software license, even if the clause appears to result in more immediate payment from the breaching party.

Facts and Procedural History

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]