US Attorney Berman Says SDNY Prosecutors Aren't Bound by Epstein's Nonprosecution Agreement in Florida
U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman of the Southern District of New York said the decade-old nonprosecution agreement between Jeffrey Epstein and Florida federal prosecutors did not affect his office's ability to indict Epstein Monday morning on federal charges of sex trafficking and conspiracy.
July 08, 2019 at 06:29 PM
5 minute read
New York federal prosecutors said Monday they were not bound by an earlier agreement in Florida not to pursue sexual abuse charges against wealthy financier Jeffrey Epstein, who has now been charged with allegedly exploiting dozens of underage girls at his homes in Manhattan and Palm Beach, Florida.
U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman of the Southern District of New York said the decade-old nonprosecution agreement between Epstein and Florida federal prosecutors did not affect his office's ability to indict Epstein Monday morning on federal charges of sex trafficking and conspiracy.
“That agreement only binds, by its terms … the Southern District of Florida. The Southern District of New York is not bound by that agreement, and is not a signatory to that agreement,” Berman said at a press conference, shortly after the 13-page indictment was unsealed in Manhattan federal court.
According to Southern District prosecutors, Epstein paid girls as young as 14 years old from 2002 to 2005 to perform nude or seminude massages, which became “increasingly sexual” in nature, with Epstein typically masturbating and molesting his victims.
Berman said Epstein would also pay some victims “hundreds of dollars” to recruit other young girls to the network, allowing Epstein to create “an ever-expanding web of new victims.”
Epstein pleaded not guilty to the charges on Monday.
The indictment, however, was not the first time that Epstein, who is known for his connections with powerful figures across the political spectrum, has come under scrutiny for alleged sexual misconduct against minors.
In 2007, Epstein signed a secret agreement with federal prosecutors in Miami, which shielded him and his alleged accomplices from federal prosecution in a case alleging that they had run a child sex ring out of Epstein's Palm Beach mansion between 1999 and 2007.
In exchange for the deal, Epstein pleaded guilty to two state prostitution charges, and served 13 months in Palm Beach County jail, where he had work-release privileges and was allowed to continue managing money during the day. Epstein faced a possible life sentence, and his alleged co-conspirators were never charged.
Earlier this year, a Florida federal judge ruled that prosecutors, including former Miami U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta—now U.S. Labor Secretary—broke federal law by keeping the agreement secret from Epstein's alleged victims. The Justice Department has opened an investigation into prosecutor's handling of the plea deal, after a series of articles by the Miami Herald drew renewed attention to the case.
Charles Ross, a partner with Mintz & Gold in Manhattan, said Epstein's defense team would likely point to the nonprosecution agreement to argue that Berman was barred from bringing the case in the Southern District of New York.
That position, he said, could hinge on the underlying agreement and covers certain acts or types of crimes, and attorneys from both sides would be sure to pour over the language with a “fine-tooth comb.”
“The play that Epstein's defense lawyers would have is the breadth that the those nonprosecution agreements confer,” said Ross, who maintained his own law offices in New York and Florida before joining Mintz & Gold.
“Typically, nonprosecution agreements are limited to the jurisdiction which grants them and writes them, and that's certainly the position of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York,” he said.
Prosecutors in New York have alleged a conspiracy that included unnamed employees setting up “appointments” with underage girls on Epstein's behalf. One person in New York, identified in the indictment as Employee-2, would call victims before Epstein traveled to Florida to make sure the encounters were set up when he arrived, the filing alleged.
Ross said the conspiracy count allowed the Southern District to reach acts outside of Manhattan, and contacts between alleged co-conspirators in New York and victims in Florida would help prosecutors make their case for jurisdiction.
“Certainly, the Southern District of New York can reach acts outside of the Southern District of New York. What they need is acts that take place within the the Southern District,” he said.
Epstein was taken into custody July 6 at Teterboro Airport in New Jersey after arriving on his private jet from Paris. His arrest followed an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the public-corruption unit of the U.S. Attorney's Office, along with the New York City Police Department.
Berman declined to comment further on Monday about the involvement of the public-corruption unit, and said he would not discuss “speculation” regarding high-profile people associated with Epstein.
Epstein is being held at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan, where he was ordered to remain Monday ahead of a bail hearing scheduled for Thursday.
The case has been assigned to Judge Richard M. Berman of the Southern District of New York.
Read More:
Epstein Indicted for Sex Crimes in Manhattan, South Fla
2nd Circuit Orders Jeffrey Epstein Records Unsealed, Cautions Media and Public
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSkadden and Steptoe, Defending Amex GBT, Blasts Biden DOJ's Antitrust Lawsuit Over Merger Proposal
4 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readAfter Solving Problems for Presidents, Ron Klain Now Applying Legal Prowess to Helping Airbnb Overturn NYC Ban
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Paul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Continues Finance Practice Build
- 2Chancery: Common Stock Worthless in 'Jacobson v. Akademos' and Transaction Was Entirely Fair
- 3'We Neither Like Nor Dislike the Fifth Circuit'
- 4Local Boutique Expands Significantly, Hiring Litigator Who Won $63M Verdict Against City of Miami Commissioner
- 5Senior Associates' Billing Rates See The Biggest Jump
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250