US Attorney Berman Says SDNY Prosecutors Aren't Bound by Epstein's Nonprosecution Agreement in Florida
U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman of the Southern District of New York said the decade-old nonprosecution agreement between Jeffrey Epstein and Florida federal prosecutors did not affect his office's ability to indict Epstein Monday morning on federal charges of sex trafficking and conspiracy.
July 08, 2019 at 06:29 PM
5 minute read
New York federal prosecutors said Monday they were not bound by an earlier agreement in Florida not to pursue sexual abuse charges against wealthy financier Jeffrey Epstein, who has now been charged with allegedly exploiting dozens of underage girls at his homes in Manhattan and Palm Beach, Florida.
U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman of the Southern District of New York said the decade-old nonprosecution agreement between Epstein and Florida federal prosecutors did not affect his office's ability to indict Epstein Monday morning on federal charges of sex trafficking and conspiracy.
“That agreement only binds, by its terms … the Southern District of Florida. The Southern District of New York is not bound by that agreement, and is not a signatory to that agreement,” Berman said at a press conference, shortly after the 13-page indictment was unsealed in Manhattan federal court.
According to Southern District prosecutors, Epstein paid girls as young as 14 years old from 2002 to 2005 to perform nude or seminude massages, which became “increasingly sexual” in nature, with Epstein typically masturbating and molesting his victims.
Berman said Epstein would also pay some victims “hundreds of dollars” to recruit other young girls to the network, allowing Epstein to create “an ever-expanding web of new victims.”
Epstein pleaded not guilty to the charges on Monday.
The indictment, however, was not the first time that Epstein, who is known for his connections with powerful figures across the political spectrum, has come under scrutiny for alleged sexual misconduct against minors.
In 2007, Epstein signed a secret agreement with federal prosecutors in Miami, which shielded him and his alleged accomplices from federal prosecution in a case alleging that they had run a child sex ring out of Epstein's Palm Beach mansion between 1999 and 2007.
In exchange for the deal, Epstein pleaded guilty to two state prostitution charges, and served 13 months in Palm Beach County jail, where he had work-release privileges and was allowed to continue managing money during the day. Epstein faced a possible life sentence, and his alleged co-conspirators were never charged.
Earlier this year, a Florida federal judge ruled that prosecutors, including former Miami U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta—now U.S. Labor Secretary—broke federal law by keeping the agreement secret from Epstein's alleged victims. The Justice Department has opened an investigation into prosecutor's handling of the plea deal, after a series of articles by the Miami Herald drew renewed attention to the case.
Charles Ross, a partner with Mintz & Gold in Manhattan, said Epstein's defense team would likely point to the nonprosecution agreement to argue that Berman was barred from bringing the case in the Southern District of New York.
That position, he said, could hinge on the underlying agreement and covers certain acts or types of crimes, and attorneys from both sides would be sure to pour over the language with a “fine-tooth comb.”
“The play that Epstein's defense lawyers would have is the breadth that the those nonprosecution agreements confer,” said Ross, who maintained his own law offices in New York and Florida before joining Mintz & Gold.
“Typically, nonprosecution agreements are limited to the jurisdiction which grants them and writes them, and that's certainly the position of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York,” he said.
Prosecutors in New York have alleged a conspiracy that included unnamed employees setting up “appointments” with underage girls on Epstein's behalf. One person in New York, identified in the indictment as Employee-2, would call victims before Epstein traveled to Florida to make sure the encounters were set up when he arrived, the filing alleged.
Ross said the conspiracy count allowed the Southern District to reach acts outside of Manhattan, and contacts between alleged co-conspirators in New York and victims in Florida would help prosecutors make their case for jurisdiction.
“Certainly, the Southern District of New York can reach acts outside of the Southern District of New York. What they need is acts that take place within the the Southern District,” he said.
Epstein was taken into custody July 6 at Teterboro Airport in New Jersey after arriving on his private jet from Paris. His arrest followed an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the public-corruption unit of the U.S. Attorney's Office, along with the New York City Police Department.
Berman declined to comment further on Monday about the involvement of the public-corruption unit, and said he would not discuss “speculation” regarding high-profile people associated with Epstein.
Epstein is being held at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan, where he was ordered to remain Monday ahead of a bail hearing scheduled for Thursday.
The case has been assigned to Judge Richard M. Berman of the Southern District of New York.
|Read More:
|Epstein Indicted for Sex Crimes in Manhattan, South Fla
2nd Circuit Orders Jeffrey Epstein Records Unsealed, Cautions Media and Public
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDecision of the Day: Attorney in Social Security Case Awarded Fees, But Must Pay Client Refund Under Equal Access to Justice Act
The Kids Online Safety Act Threatens Free Speech and Opens the Door to Political Weaponization
6 minute readFTC's New 'Click To Cancel' Rule Is Here, But Will It Survive Judicial Challenge?
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250