Recruiter Sues Windels Marx, Seeking $3 Million for IP Group Placement
Austin & Devon Associates says the law firm's managing partner admitted that he felt “terrible,” but the firm has still refused to pay a fee for a group move from Budd Larner.
July 10, 2019 at 05:05 PM
4 minute read
A headhunting firm has sued the tri-state law firm of Windels, Marx, Lane & Mittendorf for $3 million, claiming the law firm failed to pay a placement fee for an IP group move from Budd Larner.
New York-based Austin & Devon Associates, led by legal recruiter Kim Valentini, said it put Andrew Miller and his “highly profitable” group of pharmaceuticals-focused intellectual property lawyers on the radar of Windels Marx managing partner Robert Luddy back in 2017.
Windels Marx ultimately hired Miller and his team earlier this year, but the firm refused to pay the recruiter's fees, thought to be at least $3 million, said Austin & Devon in its Manhattan Supreme Court lawsuit.
The recruiter's complaint was filed Tuesday, the same day that Windels Marx announced that even more Budd Larner attorneys had joined its ranks.
“Austin & Devon did everything it promised to do—it introduced Windels Marx to a group of talented attorneys that the firm liked enough to hire,” the complaint said. “But despite reaping the rewards of Austin & Devon's work, Windels Marx will not honor its promises.”
The recruiting firm said it signed a contract with Windels Marx in 2013 that put a 12-month time limit on any obligation to pay Austin & Devon in the case of associates who were referred to the firm, according to the complaint. But because partner and group moves typically entail lengthy negotiations, no such limit applied, Austin & Devon claims.
According to the complaint, Valentini revealed Miller's willingness to make a move to Luddy in May 2017 and set up a meeting between the two men in June. But Luddy, the complaint said, told Valentini later that month to “sit tight,” and she didn't get a response to a follow-up she sent Luddy in July asking, “Anything new with Andrew or is it dead?”
Near the end of 2017, Valentini pitched Miller on joining another firm, only to learn from him that he was still going back and forth with Windels Marx. She emailed Luddy about it, but he didn't reply, the complaint said.
In April 2019, three days after Windels Marx put out a press release announcing the move of 19 people, including Miller's team of 15 lawyers from Budd Larner, Valentini spoke with Luddy. They discussed a firm that might be open to joining Windels Marx, but the Miller move also came up.
“Luddy told her that Windels Marx had just hired Miller and his group,” the suit states. “He told her he felt 'terrible' about the whole thing and that he didn't want her to find out about it from the legal press.”
Miller, who was on Budd Larner's executive committee, and his team were among the last to jump ship from the Short Hills, New Jersey-based law firm before ALM revealed that it was planning to shut its doors this summer. The firm confirmed last month that it would shut its doors in July; its website says that is still the plan.
Upon learning about Miller's move from Luddy, Austin & Devon's lawyer demanded payment. It hasn't come, the suit said. “Windels Marx understood what it was doing was wrong … but it still refused to pay what was promised,” Rob Glunt of MandelBhandari, who represents Valentini's recruiting firm, told ALM.
A spokeswoman for Windels Marx declined to comment. Miller, who was not a party to the suit, did not return a message seeking comment Wednesday.
Valentini focuses on finding partners for Am Law 100 firms, according to the complaint. Valentini, who used to be known as Kim Shamsky, previously sued Deloitte and a human resources employee there for allegedly turning down recruiting proposals after she rejected the HR official's sexual advances, Manhattan Supreme Court records show. That case was dismissed in 2015.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250