Case Law Regarding Role of Child Is Clear
We believe that the case law is clear regarding the role of the child and his or her attorney in custody and visitation proceedings.
July 16, 2019 at 09:54 AM
2 minute read
We at The Children's Law Center (CLC) strongly disagree with Joel Brandes's assertion in his recent article “What is the Status of the Child in a Custody Case?” (NYLJ, July 8, 2019) that the departments of the Appellate Division have ruled inconsistently with regard to the child's standing and status in custody and visitation cases. As the first public interest law firm in New York City dedicated to the representation of children in custody, guardianship, and visitation matters, and as the attorneys who filed and prosecuted, on behalf of our child-client, the appeal in Matter of Newton v. McFarlane, we believe that the case law is clear regarding the role of the child and his or her attorney in custody and visitation proceedings.
While we take no issue with the author's summaries of the relevant case law, we also find no disunity in the Departments' holdings. In fact, we believe that McFarlane, with its thorough analysis, articulates the settled principle of New York state law, that once an attorney for the child (AFC) is appointed, that AFC has the right to participate fully in all aspects of a case, including by filing motions seeking changes in custody or visitation, and also has standing to file an appeal. In the cases that Mr. Brandes cites, the Fourth Department did not rule otherwise, as it never disputed that the AFC had standing to file and pursue an appeal on behalf of the child. Rather, the court's unwillingness to decide in the children's favor hinged on the litigants' lack of cooperation with the children's desired outcomes.
An also unambiguous, if not more important, take-away from the court's decision in McFarlane is the significance of the child's position in custody and visitation proceedings. Unlike in most other types of litigation, the subject of a custody or visitation case is a young person, on whom a court's decision will have a substantial impact, perhaps even more than on the litigants. The Appellate Division's four departments undoubtedly have agreed that the voice of that child deserves to be heard.
Karen Simmons, Executive Director Janet Neustaetter, Supervising Attorney, Appeals and Writing Unit Louise Feld, Writing and Policy Attorney The Children's Law Center
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAttorney Responds to Outten & Golden Managing Partner's Letter on Dropped Client
3 minute readLetter to the Editor: Law Journal Used Misleading Photo for Article on Election Observers
1 minute readNYC's Administrative Court's to Publish Some Rulings in the New York Law Journal Is Welcomed. But It Should Go Further
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250