Second Circuit Upholds 'Pharma Bro' Martin Shkreli's Fraud Conviction, $7.3M Asset Forfeiture
The New York City-based federal appeals court upholds Martin Shkreli's conviction on securities fraud and conspiracy charges.
July 18, 2019 at 11:15 AM
3 minute read
The New York City-based federal appeals court on Thursday morning upheld Martin Shkreli's conviction on securities fraud and conspiracy charges, along with an order requiring him to forfeit $7.3 million to the government.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in a seven-page summary order, rejected claims from the disgraced pharmaceutical executive that the judge in his case had relayed incorrect and confusing jury instructions, leading to a split verdict in 2017 that cleared him of five other counts, including wire fraud.
A Brooklyn federal judge the following April sentenced Shkreli, the former CEO of Turing Pharmaceuticals, to serve seven years in prison, pay a fine and restitution and forfeit more than $7.3 million acquired through what prosecutors said amounted to a Ponzi scheme to defraud investors in his two hedge funds.
A three-judge panel of the appeals court found that the “no ultimate harm” jury instruction that Shkreli disputed had been upheld in multiple securities fraud cases, and its exclusion would have resulted in a “windfall” for Shkreli, who is currently serving out his sentence in Pennsylvania.
Shkreli, who became known as the “Pharma bro” after a contentious hearing where he testified to a congressional committee, had also argued that not all investors in his failed hedge funds had testified at trial, warranting a reduction in his forfeiture, which includes $5 million from his brokerage account, a one-of-a-kind Wu-Tang Clan album and a Pablo Picasso painting.
The appeals court, however, agreed with Department of justice attorneys, who cited the “sheer breadth and depth” of false promises and omissions Shkreli had made to investors.
“We agree with the government that the continuing misrepresentations sent to all investors in the funds (in the form of false performance reports sent out on a regular basis, for example) clearly link Shkreli's ability to retain the invested money to his fraud,” the panel wrote. “As such, we discern no clear error in the district court's factual finding that the money associated with all the investors was traceable to Shkreli's fraud irrespective whether or not the investors testified.”
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Mulls Big Changes to Banking Regulation, Unsettling the Industry
Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Trending Stories
- 1For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 2As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
- 3General Warrants and ESI
- 4GC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
- 5Authenticating Electronic Signatures
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250